1 / 36

Gulf of Maine cod SCAA/ASPM vs ADAPT-VPA Doug Butterworth and Rebecca Rademeyer

Gulf of Maine cod SCAA/ASPM vs ADAPT-VPA Doug Butterworth and Rebecca Rademeyer. __________________________________________________________________ Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group, University of Cape Town. METHODS.

temira
Download Presentation

Gulf of Maine cod SCAA/ASPM vs ADAPT-VPA Doug Butterworth and Rebecca Rademeyer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Gulf of Maine codSCAA/ASPM vs ADAPT-VPADoug Butterworth and Rebecca Rademeyer __________________________________________________________________ Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group, University of Cape Town

  2. METHODS ADAPT-VPA- Backward calculation- Oldest-age F assumption- Catches-at-age exact SCAA/ASPM- Based on separability: Fy,a = SaFy- Forward estimation, typically likelihood based- Errors in proportions-at-age SCAA - Statistical treatment of age data errors May include S/R relationshipASPM - Age-structured dynamics Must include S/R relationship Age data not necessary

  3. Ricker-like not Beverton-Holt S/R relationship ASPM methodology updates • M fixed (0.2) (not estimated) - All Sa’s estimated (no functional form imposed) - Model to 11+, though fit to 7+ data • MSY calculated internally - Fully Bayesian PI computations

  4. - Alt-VPA (a=est): estimates a where VPA methodology • RC-VPA: as Mayo and Col (2006) – asymp. flat selectivity - Alt-VPA (a=1): removes inconsistency in plus-group eqns Fit either to ages 1-6 or 1-7+MSY calculated externally

  5. BUTScaled to get Data used Mayo and Col (2006)

  6. 2003 ResultsGulf of Maine cod

  7. ResultsRC-ASPM(M=0.2, Ricker) Shading shows 95% PIs

  8. Abundance index fitsRC-ASPM(M=0.2, Ricker)

  9. Average age-proportion fitsRC-ASPM(M=0.2, Ricker)

  10. Selectivity estimatesRC-ASPM(M=0.2, Ricker) Commercial, pre-1992 Commercial, post-1991

  11. Selectivity estimatesRC-ASPM(M=0.2, Ricker) Commercial, pre-1992 Commercial, post-1991 NEFSC-Spring NEFSC-Autumn

  12. ASPMStock-recruit relationships Ricker -lnL = -46.3

  13. ASPMStock-recruit relationships Ricker Beverton-Holt -lnL = -46.3 -lnL = -39.9 If estimate g parameter (g =1 for Ricker): 1.05 [0.54; 1.15]

  14. -lnL = -11.4 Asymp. flat selectivity ASPMSelectivity dome -lnL = -46.3 S7/S6 =0.52 [0.41; 0.64]

  15. Per-recruit contribution to cohort biomass ASPMPast catch selectivity 1992-2004: Estimated 1981-1991: Estimated Pre-1982: Set equal to 1982-1991 Second order effect (Important assumption is unchanging survey selectivity)

  16. ASPM Results

  17. ASPM Results

  18. ASPM Results

  19. ADAPT-VPA comparisons VPA as Mayo and Col (2006)

  20. ADAPT-VPA comparisons VPA as Mayo and Col (2006) RC-VPA

  21. ADAPT-VPA comparisons VPA as Mayo and Col (2006) RC-VPA Alt-VPA, a=1

  22. ADAPT-VPA comparisons VPA as Mayo and Col (2006) RC-VPA Alt-VPA, a=1 Alt-VPA, a=est

  23. ADAPT-VPA comparisons VPA as Mayo and Col (2006) RC-VPA Alt-VPA, a=1 Alt-VPA, a=est ASPM – Data from 1982

  24. ADAPT-VPA comparisons VPA as Mayo and Col (2006) RC-VPA Alt-VPA, a=1 Alt-VPA, a=est ASPM – Data from 1982 RC – ASPM

  25. ADAPT-VPA comparisons VPA as Mayo and Col (2006) RC-VPA Alt-VPA, a=1 Alt-VPA, a=est ASPM – Data from 1982 RC – ASPM

  26. ADAPT-VPASelectivities RC-VPA

  27. ADAPT-VPASelectivities RC-VPA Alt-VPA, a=1

  28. ADAPT-VPASelectivities RC-VPA Alt-VPA, a=1 Alt-VPA, a=est

  29. ADAPT-VPASelectivities RC-VPA Alt-VPA, a=1 Alt-VPA, a=est ASPM – Data from 1982

  30. ADAPT-VPASelectivities RC-VPA Alt-VPA, a=1 Alt-VPA, a=est ASPM – Data from 1982 RC – ASPM

  31. ADAPT-VPA Results

  32. ADAPT-VPA Results

  33. ADAPT-VPA Results

  34. ConclusionsGeneral • Careful treatment of plus-group • Fully flexible Sa parametrization • Take care with use of Beverton-Holt S/R relationship

  35. ConclusionsGulf of Maine cod • close to and • 2003 difference as ADAPT-VPA imposed asymp. flat selectivity • Asymp. flat selectivity statistically inconsistent with data Independent evidence of mechanisms to give dome shape ? Robust to sensitivities • SCAA to be preferred Enables use of pre-1982 data Greater range of Bsp Better precision of estimates M-S Act focus on MSY

  36. Thank you for your attention

More Related