Neuroeconomics of games and decisions colin camerer caltech
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 34

Neuroeconomics of Games and Decisions* Colin Camerer, Caltech   PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 72 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Neuroeconomics of Games and Decisions* Colin Camerer, Caltech   . Neuroeconomics: Grounding micro-economics in details of neural activity Part of behavioral economics (using psychology to inform theories of rationality limits) Part of experimental economics (new techniques)

Download Presentation

Neuroeconomics of Games and Decisions* Colin Camerer, Caltech  

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Neuroeconomics of games and decisions colin camerer caltech

Neuroeconomics of Games and Decisions*Colin Camerer, Caltech  

  • Neuroeconomics:

    • Grounding micro-economics in details of neural activity

    • Part of behavioral economics (using psychology to inform theories of rationality limits)

    • Part of experimental economics (new techniques)

    • Part of neuroscience (higher order cognition)

      *”Neuroeconomics” Camerer, Loewenstein, Prelec J EconLit (85 pp), Scan J Econ (25 pp), “Why economics needs brains”

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Collaborators

Collaborators

  • Caltech: Meghana Bhatt, Ming Hsu, Ralph Adolphs, Cedric Anen, Steve Quartz

  • Iowa: Dan Tranel

  • Baylor: Brooks King-Casas, Damon Tomlin, Read Montague

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Three directions in neuroeconomics

Three directions in neuroeconomics

  • I. Support for rational-choice models

    • “Belief” neurons

    • Expected-value neurons

    • “Monkey shopping” satisfies GARP

  • II: Support for behavioral alternatives

    • Loss-aversion in monkey shopping

    • Learning in trust games

    • Ambiguity vs. risk (Knight, Ellsberg)

  • III: New concepts

    • Equilibrium as a “state of mind”

    • Neural correlates of “strategic IQ”

    • Biological basis of demand

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Economically important regions of the human brain

Economically-important regions of the human brain

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Cingulate yellow orbitofrontal pink amygdala orange somatosensory green insula purple

Cingulate (yellow), orbitofrontal (pink), amygdala (orange), somatosensory (green),insula (purple)

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Important facts about the brain

Important facts about the brain

  • Functional “modularity”…

    • …but “plastic” esp. in childhood

  • Behavior depends on circuits

  • Human brain is primate brain + neocortex

    • Language, social organization (institutions)

    • Infants, fraternity parties show similarity

  • Many biological functions are automated; conscious attention is scarce (flicker paradigm)

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Neuroeconomics of games and decisions colin camerer caltech

I: Rational choice in the brainMidbrain neurons anticipate reward (L), encode value function V(.) learning (R) (Schultz, Dayan, Montague Sci 97)

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Neuron firing rates y axis encode expected value x axis glimcher

Neuron firing rates (y axis) encode expected value (x-axis) (Glimcher)

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Monkeys play mixed equilibrium as humans do dorris glimcher neuron 04

Monkeys play mixed equilibrium as humans do (Dorris-Glimcher Neuron 04)

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Capuchin monkeys respond to prices keith chen et al 05

Capuchin monkeys respond to prices (Keith Chen et al 05)

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Ii behavioral economics in the brain

II: Behavioral economics in the brain

  • Monkey choices are sensitive to reference points

  • Reference point (initial food reward endowment)

    • 1212

      Outcome 1 1 (1,2) (1,2)

      Choice % 79% 21% 71% 29%

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Design goal link stimuli with unobserved parametric processes variables with circuitry

Design goal: Link stimuli with unobserved parametric processes/variables with circuitry

0-step thinking

1-step thinking

Equilibrium C=br(B)

w(red)-P(red)

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Overview of fmri

Overview of fMRI

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Neuroeconomics of games and decisions colin camerer caltech

Data transformations

Statistical parametric map (SPM)

Design matrix

Image time-series

Kernel

General linear model

Realignment

Smoothing

Statistical

inference

Normalisation

p <0.05

Template

Parameter estimates

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Ambiguity aversion with ming hsu et al

Ambiguity Aversion (with Ming Hsu et al)

  • This material is in review and cannot be publicly circulated at this time.

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Iii new ideas

III: New ideas

  • Limited planning in bargaining

    limited steps of thinking

  • Equilibrium as a “state of mind”

  • Biological bases of demand

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Rubinstein stahl alternating offer shrinking pie bargaining

Rubinstein-Stahl alternating offershrinking-pie bargaining

  • 1 offers division of $5 ------------ accept

    2 offers division of 2.50 ----------- accept

    1 offers division of 1.25 ------------ accept

    (0,0)

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Limited planning in bargaining science 03

Limited planning in bargaining (Science, 03)

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Cognitive hierarchy thinking in games camerer ho chong qje 04

Cognitive hierarchy thinking in games (Camerer, Ho, Chong, QJE 04)

  • Step 0 players choose randomly

  • Step k players have beliefs gk(h)

  • Step k players choose s*i(k)= argmax s Σh gk(h)πi(s,s*(h))

    • One-step-below gk(k-1)=1

      • Nagel (1995), Stahl-Wilson (1995), Costa-gomes-Crawford-Broseta (2001)

    • Nornalized overconfidence gk(h)= gk(h)/Σhk-1gk(h)

      • gk(h)= 0 for h>k

    • Link to hierarchical QRE (Palfrey-Rogers-Camerer, on this computer)

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Limited equilibration beauty contest game

Limited equilibrationBeauty contest game

  • N players choose numbers xi in [0,100]

  • Compute target (2/3)*( xi /N)

  • Closest to target wins $20

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Neuroeconomics of games and decisions colin camerer caltech

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Neural correlates of iterated belief bhatt camerer geb in press

Neural correlates of iterated belief (Bhatt-Camerer GEB in press)

  • 8 dominance-solvable games.

  • C, B, 2B in random order for each game

  • Paid for choice (x$.30) or accuracy B, 2B ($15) against live opponent outside the scanner. (Enables measure of scanner on behavior.)

  • N=16 Caltech community students

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Example 1 step easy game b dominates a l r payoff separation allows eye tracking

Example: 1-step (easy) game; B dominates A. L-R payoff separation allows “eye tracking”

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Neuroeconomics of games and decisions colin camerer caltech

Conformity to equilibrium: There are many nonequilibrium trialsNote: C matches 2B more often than B matches 2B

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Neuroeconomics of games and decisions colin camerer caltech

Equilibrium is a state of mind:Expected reward theory of mind + (in equilibrium ↓) (↓ out-of-equilibrium)

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Subject complaining after an experiment zamir 2000

Subject complaining after an experiment (Zamir, 2000)

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Ultimatum games this is your brain on unfairness sanfey rilling et al sci 13 march 03

Ultimatum games: This is your brain on unfairness(Sanfey, Rilling et al, Sci 13 March ’03)

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Consistent 2 nd order beliefs c 2b vs inconsistent false c 2b

2nd-order belief consistency differential activates dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)

DLPFC also seen in ultimatum games after low offers (“intentions matter”)

DLPFC is part of 2nd-order belief circuitry?

Consistent 2nd-order beliefs (c=2b) vs inconsistent (“false”) (c≠2b)

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Deactivation in insula and high strategic iq

Strategic IQ (x-axis): How much you earn from choices & beliefs

Correlated (-) with activity in L insula in choice task

 Are overly self-focussed people poor strategic thinkers?

Deactivation in insula and high strategic IQ

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Insula and low strategic iq

Strategic IQ (x-axis): How much you earn from choices & beliefs

Correlated (-) with activity in L insula in choice task

 Are overly self-focussed people poor strategic thinkers?

Insula and low strategic IQ

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Correlates of higher strategic iq

Correlates of higher strategic IQ

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


New ideas biological basis for demand

New ideas: Biological basis for demand

  • Economics takes demand as given. But…

    • Influence of advertising

    • Familiarity and habit formation (“tight playlist” radio stations)

    • Imitation of movie stars/TV shows

      • “LA Law” boom in law school applications

    • Sense-making drive demand for “closure”  lawsuits

    • Media: “If it bleeds, it leads”, NASCAR races

      • Does the amygdala control the TV remote?

    • Addiction: Is golf or shoe-shopping like heroin?

    • Labor market discrimination (Phelps et al)?

      • Unfamiliar black faces activate white student amygdalae

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Conclusions

Conclusions

  • I: Rational choice processes in the brain

    • Monkey belief neurons, games, shopping

  • II: Behavioral economics in the brain

    • Monkey loss-aversion

    • Ambiguity activates amygdala-OFC, risk striatum

      • Lesion patients with OFC are “rational”…for the wrong reason?

  • III: New ideas from neureconomics

    • Limited strategic thinking equilibrium as a “state of mind”

    • Skill (strategic IQ) correlated + with precuneus, caudate,

      correlated - with insula

    • Biological basis of demand

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


Activation in cingulate cortex spindle cell density

Activation in cingulate cortex & spindle cell density

Nemmers Prize talk May 7, 2005


  • Login