1 / 21

Hollie Wilson, PhD Scholar International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety

Who are the real “first offenders”?. Hollie Wilson, PhD Scholar International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety Oslo, Norway 22 nd -26 th August 2010. CRICOS No. 00213J. Acknowledgements. Supervisory team Em Prof. Mary Sheehan Dr. Gavan Palk Funding

teddy
Download Presentation

Hollie Wilson, PhD Scholar International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Who are the real “first offenders”? Hollie Wilson, PhD Scholar International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety Oslo, Norway 22nd-26th August 2010 CRICOS No. 00213J

  2. Acknowledgements • Supervisory team • Em Prof. Mary Sheehan • Dr. Gavan Palk • Funding • Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) • Centre for Accident Research & Road Safety – Queensland (CARRS-Q)

  3. Overview of presentation • Drink driving: Australian & Queensland contexts • Offender characteristics • First offender characteristics • Research aims • Methodology • Sample characteristics • Results • Limitations • Policy & countermeasure implications

  4. Drink Driving: Australian Context Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2008) found: • One in eight people (12.1%) admit to driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, with males (16.2%) more than twice as likely as females (8.0%) to admit to engaging in drink driving According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009): • In 2007/2008, there were 63,731 drink driving cases heard by a magistrate. CRICOS No. 00213J

  5. Drink Driving: Queensland Context • A blood alcohol concentration (BAC) above 0.05% was noted in 33% of all driver and rider fatalities tested in Queensland in 2003. So, what are the characteristics of drink driving offenders?

  6. All Offender Characteristics Leal et al., (2006) found that offenders were: • Male, under 35 • Holder of provisional or open licence (but, novice drivers who have a no alcohol restriction are over-represented) • Self report drink driving at least once in the last 6 months • Average BAC of 0.1 But what are the characteristics of ‘first offenders’?

  7. First offender characteristics • Not a lot is known about this group in Australia • Largest group of drink driving offenders (approx. 75%) • 15% go on to become repeat offenders in a 3 year period • May be heterogeneous group How many of these offenders are simply ‘first time caught?’

  8. Research aims • Overall objective:- Determine the characteristics of first time drink driving offenders in Queensland. • Study aims:- • Determine by self report whether ‘first offenders’ are simply ‘first time caught’. • Identify key variables to determine what factors are significantly associated with past drink driving in the first offender group. • Identify, if any, significant predictors of past drink driving.

  9. Study methodology • Offenders interviewed in court directly following index offence – • Brisbane (Metropolitan - 168 offenders) • Maroochydore (Regional - 33 offenders) • Interview schedule – • Demographic characteristics • Offence information • Drink driving history • Alcohol use (AUDIT)

  10. Sample characteristics • Offenders in the sample: • Male (74%) • Average age of 29 (SD=9.93) • Single (71%) • Education (80% at least secondary school) • Employed (76%) • Experienced drivers (50% over 10 years) • Apprehended by random breath testing (RBT) (70%) • Risky drinkers (80%) And as predicted... ‘first time caught’

  11. Self reported drink driving in the six months prior to offence

  12. *p <.05

  13. *p <.001

  14. Percentage of past reported drink driving according to risky drinking

  15. Percentage of self reported drink driving according to age groups

  16. Logistic Regression • Risky drinkers were 4.6 times more likely to report drink driving in the 6 months prior to the offence than non risky drinkers*. • Other offender characteristics were not significant. *(CI 95%)

  17. Summary of findings • Risky drinking and age were significantly associated with past reported drink driving in bivariate analyses. • Risky drinkers were almost 5 times as likely to engage in drink driving in the six months prior to the offence.

  18. Limitations • Preliminary results of a very small part of initial research – more research to follow! • Self report measures • Sample characteristics • Educated • Number of offenders • Time frame • 5 year recidivist classification

  19. Research Directions • Follow-up offenders (phone/web based) • Queensland Transport crash/offence data for study participants • Design an intervention program (computer based) specifically for first offenders

  20. Policy & Countermeasure Implications • Education and rehabilitation programs relating to drink driving • Targeting risky drinkers • Brief intervention • Legislative reform which allows for all offenders to take part in targeted rehabilitation

  21. Questions? hollie.wilson@qut.edu.au Mark your Diaries! International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety Conference (T2013) August 2013, Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre

More Related