1 / 18

HEp-2 Cells Classification via fusion of morphological and textural features

I. Theodorakopoulos, D. Kastaniotis , G. Economou and S. Fotopoulos { iltheodorako , dkastaniotis }@ upatras.gr , { economou , spiros }@ physics.upatras.gr. HEp-2 Cells Classification via fusion of morphological and textural features. Computer Vision Group Electronics Laboratory

ted
Download Presentation

HEp-2 Cells Classification via fusion of morphological and textural features

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. I. Theodorakopoulos, D. Kastaniotis, G. Economou and S. Fotopoulos • {iltheodorako, dkastaniotis}@upatras.gr , {economou, spiros}@physics.upatras.gr HEp-2 Cells Classification via fusion of morphological and textural features Computer Vision Group Electronics Laboratory Physics Department University of Patras, Greece www.upcv.upatras.gr www.ellab.physics.upatras.gr 13 November 2012 • IEEE 12th International Conference on BioInformatics & BioEngineering

  2. Motivation • The standard screening test for detection of autoimmune diseases is the indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) test. • Human autoantibodies (AABs) associated with various autoimmune conditions, are detected by specific fluorescence patterns on a human epithelial cell line (HEp-2). • Testing is performed manually but : • Requires highly-specialized personnel. • Time-consuming procedure. • Low standardization leads to high inter-laboratory variance.

  3. Typical IIF Procedure

  4. Typical IIF Procedure • Input: • Single-Cell Images • Cell Contour • Fluorescence Intensity

  5. Taxonomy • More than thirty different nuclear and cytoplasm patterns could be identified. • Can be grouped into six basic patterns:

  6. Properties • Different staining patterns present variations both in: • Morphological characteristics • Shape complexity • Holes • Intensity peaks • Textural characteristics • Smooth Areas • Grainy Areas • In order to capture the unique properties of each pattern, incorporation of both morphological and textural descriptors seems reasonable.

  7. Multi-level Thresholding

  8. Multi-level Thresholding

  9. Multi-level Thresholding

  10. Multi-level Thresholding

  11. Multi-level Thresholding

  12. Morphological Features • Cell’s contour complexity • Threshold cell image into 9 levels equally spaced between intensity extremes. • Perform Connected Components Analysis on each binary image. • Discard blobs with area <1% of the mean area. • On each binary image, compute: • Number of detected blobs • Density of detected blobs • Mean solidity of the detected blobs • Concatenate all features to a 28-dimensional descriptor

  13. Local Binary Patterns (LBPs) • A well-established textural descriptor. • The biggest part of textural information is encoded in the 58 uniform patterns. • LBPs are not rotation invariant. • A simple solution is to calculate the uniform LPBs histograms on 80 rotated instances of the cell image (4.5 deg intervals).

  14. Local Binary Patterns (LBPs)

  15. Classification • The 28 morphological features and the 58-bin LBPs descriptor are concatenated in a 86-Dimensional feature vector. • Classification is performed using non-linear SVMs with Gaussian kernel.

  16. Evaluation • Lack of publicly available datasets. • Evaluation on the dataset of HEp-2 cell classification contest (hosted by ICPR 2012 conference) • 721 single-cell fluorescence images. • Manually segmented and annotated by specialists in order to provide ground truth. • Binary masks and fluorescence intensity are provided. • Approximately uniform distribution of patterns. • There are not reported results for comparison yet.

  17. Results K-fold validation - Classification performance of the various feature sets for variable k Confusion Matrix for 10-fold validation procedure using morphological and textural features’ fusion

  18. Thank You Acknowledgment This research has been co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund – ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program "Education and Lifelong Learning" of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) - Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II. Investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund.

More Related