1 / 41

FEDERAL PROGRAM OUTLINE

FEDERAL PROGRAM OUTLINE. What is Safe Routes?. A Federal transportation program to “…enable and encourage children, including those with disabilities, to walk and bicycle to school…”. The 5 “E’s”. Engineering Education Enforcement Encouragement Evaluation.

tayten
Download Presentation

FEDERAL PROGRAM OUTLINE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FEDERAL PROGRAM OUTLINE

  2. What is Safe Routes? • A Federal transportation program to “…enable and encourage children, including those with disabilities, to walk and bicycle to school…”

  3. The 5 “E’s” • Engineering • Education • Enforcement • Encouragement • Evaluation

  4. Safe Routes to School Program Goals • To enable and encourage children, including those with disabilities, to walk and bicycle to school

  5. Program Goals • To make bicycling and walking to school a safer and more appealing transportation alternative, thereby encouraging a healthy and active lifestyle from an early age; and

  6. Program Goals • To facilitate the planning, development, and implementation of projects and activities that will improve safety and reduce traffic, fuel consumption, and air pollution in the vicinity of schools.

  7. Who is the program for? Any Public or Private school with any combination of K-8 enrollment.

  8. Who Can Apply? • Schools, both public and private • School Districts • Cities • Counties • State Agencies • Regional Development Commissions • Metropolitan Planning Organizations • Public and non-profit entities working on behalf of a school(s) or school district

  9. Funding Categories • 70% infrastructure • Consists of engineering and construction projects • Examples: • Crosswalk improvements • Sidewalk completion and maintenance • Signing • Bike lanes

  10. Funding Categories • 10% non-infrastructure • Projects focused on; education, enforcement, and encouragement. • Examples: • Bike rodeo • Walk and bike to school day • Incentives • Training and equipment for crosswalk guards

  11. Funding Categories • 20% for either category or “flex” • These funds may be spent for either infrastructure or non-infrastructure projects

  12. Reimbursement • SRTS funds are 100% reimbursable • Reimbursements can be made incrementally. • All costs submitted for reimbursement are subject to eligibility requirements. • Any costs incurred prior to a project’s authorization are not eligible for reimbursement.

  13. Reimbursement SRTS grants are Title 23 funds and are distributed on a reimbursable basis. This means that the bills for the project must be paid up front and the receipts and/or invoices must be sent in to State Aid for reimbursement of project expenses.

  14. EXAMPLES OF ELIGIBLE PROJECTS

  15. Connecting Neighborhoods

  16. Route Completion

  17. Providing a Route

  18. Making Routes Inviting

  19. Traffic Calming

  20. Bike Racks

  21. Sponsorship of a Walk To School Day!

  22. The classic ‘Walking School Bus’

  23. Make Crosswalks Safer! Make Routes Safer Crosswalks- What the pedestrian sees: & what the vehicle sees at the same crosswalk

  24. Some crosswalks look nice yet are still unsafe Crosswalks- What the pedestrian sees: & what the vehicle sees at the same crosswalk

  25. A well marked crosswalk

  26. Active Speed Monitor

  27. MINNESOTA’S SRTS PROGRAM

  28. Minnesota’s SRTS Funding • Minnesota is expected to receive $8.3 million over the life of SAFETEA-LU (2009). • 2005: $850,000.00 • 2006: $1,224,901.00 • 2007: $1,644,551.10 • 2008: $2,035,255.30 • 2009: $2,545,531.55

  29. Minnesota’s SRTS Development • Development and oversight of the program is the responsibility of two internal committees. • The Working Group • 12 Mn/DOT staff • assist the coordinator in developing program content and procedures. • The Executive Committee • 6 Mn/DOT senior staff • Provide policy recommendations

  30. Minnesota’s SRTS Development • Federal Guidance received Jan. 2006 • Application development Jan.–Apr. 2006

  31. Minnesota’s SRTS Development • First solicitation May 6, 2006 ~ July 5, 2006 • Infrastructure Program total $1.4 million • Non-Infrastructure Program total $250,000

  32. Minnesota’s SRTS Partners • Application is designed to ensure that key stakeholders are in agreement prior to submitting an application. • Applications must clearly identify and have agreement from the school or school district and the roadway authority.

  33. Minnesota’s SRTS PartnersCities and Counties • May apply for SRTS funds • May partner with others • Develop cost estimates for application • Make Design Recommendations • Sign Off on Construction Projects • Liaison with DSAE

  34. Minnesota’s SRTS Partners Cities and Counties • Sponsors for infrastructure projects • Financial Support • Similar to the Enhancement program. • Act as the financial agent, fronting funds until reimbursed

  35. Minnesota’s SRTS Partners Metropolitan Planning Organizations(MPO) • If your community is in: • East Grand Forks • St. Cloud • Rochester/Olmstead • The seven county metropolitan area • Moorhead • Duluth Please contact your MPO to let them know about your application so they may help you coordinate with existing plans.

  36. Minnesota’s SRTS 1st Solicitation • First solicitation outcomes: • Mn/DOT received 77 applications with requests totaling $8 million. • 17 projects have been identified for funding totaling $1.7 million • 12 Infrastructure; 5 non-infrastructure • More projects in Greater MN; than Metro • Award announcement September 2006

  37. Minnesota’s SRTS 1st Solicitation • Lessons Learned • Application form is too long • Stronger requirements on how application should be submitted. • Revisit grant floors and ceilings

  38. Next Steps • Development of a statewide outreach program. • Improvements to application form • Development of measures for communities

  39. Next Solicitation • There will be another solicitation prior to the end of calendar year 2006 • The funding available will be approximately $1.2 Million • Opening of the new solicitation is based on the completion of a revised application • All future solicitations will follow the Fall time line to coordinate with the STIP development

  40. For additional information please visit our website: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/saferoutes/index.html or contact Kristie Billiar, Safe Routes Coordinator at: kristie.billiar@dot.state.mn.us

More Related