1 / 21

(Final) report Topic Group V

(Final) report Topic Group V. Smartcard Vehicle Registration Certificate (SRC). Mr. W.E. Rijnberg Warsaw, 12-13 May 2011. Agenda. Background Action plan Results of Questionnaire Results of workshops Harmonisation Directive 1999/37/EG Description of current cases

tate-quinn
Download Presentation

(Final) report Topic Group V

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. (Final) report Topic Group V Smartcard Vehicle Registration Certificate (SRC) Mr. W.E. Rijnberg Warsaw, 12-13 May 2011

  2. Agenda • Background • Action plan • Results of Questionnaire • Results of workshops • Harmonisation Directive 1999/37/EG • Description of current cases • Conclusions Topic Group V • Recommendations • Work to do

  3. Background • 2007 Internal study RDW • 2007 RDW developed prototype of the smartcard • 2007 Presentation at EReg conference Amsterdam • - Handed out sample of the prototype • - Great interest for this subject • 2008 RDW internal study completed • 2008 Start Topic Group V after EReg conference Malta • Mandate: • Establish whether a harmonised SRC can be introduced in the future at European level. • The results of the RDW study can be used as input for this study. • The Topic Group will produce concrete proposals and recommendations and present them at the EReg conference. • Topic Group V workshop participants: NL, UK, LU, SK, PL, (A) • Chairman: W.E. Rijnberg

  4. Action plan • RDW study 2008 completed • Topic Group V Action plan 2008 approved • A data questionnaire for all EReg members on the current state of affairs regarding this subject in their country • Organisation of two workshops in 2008 (Slovakia) and 2009 (Poland) with the participating members of the Topic Group • 2010: Other priorities, work out plans in different countries • Cases: • Austria • Slovakia • Netherlands (2013) • Presentation results EReg meeting in Warsaw • Finishing final report with conclusions and recommendations

  5. Questionnaire (2009) • Information obtained from EReg members about vehicle registration certificate on the following subjects: • Usage • Production • Fraud • Initiatives • Mean reasons for implementing SRC • Value Added Service (VAS) • Priority • High response: 15 EReg members

  6. Results of Questionnaire (1/2) • Usage • Mostly transfers, obligation to present and mandatory enforcement • Production • Central and decentral distribution on equal footing • Many sent by post or at decentral locations • Fraud • 50% familiar with fraud, not much explanation of the type of fraud • Clone vehicles • Reregistration issues (Topic Group II)

  7. Results of Questionnaire (2/2) • Initiatives (2009) • Slovakia has initiated a study • Austria ready to introduce card; legislation not yet ready • Mean reasons for implementing SRC • Enhancing security and countering fraud • Technology more advanced • Growing demand for more information • Key to register, register is leading • Social requirement for the replacement of paper (E-government) • Costs are acceptable • Less chances for loss and theft • Value added services • Vehicle details, insurance, CO2, periodic motor vehicle inspection, owner photograph, service history

  8. Results of workshops • Sharing results questionnaire • Study harmonisation directive more in detail • Presentation implementation plans in Austria, Slovakia and • Netherlands • Value Addes Services (VAS): • Mileage record • Key to part information • Key to access to own details • Car damage history • Other object registration (e.g. boat, mopeds)

  9. Harmonisation Directive (1/2) • Background of the directive • Internal market, free movement of goods • Better understanding of harmonised documents • Reregistration easier • Measure against fraud and stolen vehicles • Better international information exchange • History of the Directive • 1999: Council Directive 1999/37/EC introduced • 2003: Annex: Possibility of SmartCard in the Directive • 1 June 2004: Member States had to comply with the Directive • After 2004 no changes made to the Directive

  10. Harmonisation Directive (2/2) • Directive can be divided into: • Mandatory items • Optional items • VAS items • Technical standards • ISO standards for card and chip not in line with modern standards (e.g. driving licence more in line) • Technical vehicle data not compared with modern inspection and type approval directives

  11. Conclusion Directive (1/2) • Directive is not being kept up-to-date • It emerged in Topic Group II in April 2011 that the EC is willing to update the annexes • Mandatory items still effective for EU Member States? • Data exchange is now possible in the EU digitally with Eucaris. Include in the Directive as an option if no documents are held upon reregistration • Still reregistration problems

  12. Conclusion Directive (2/2) • ISO standard is outdated; • Driving licence directive is due for a third revision. Use these more modern ISO standards • Formulate uniform framework directive for ISO standards for driving licence, vehicle registration certificate, tachograph, e.g. • Directive must remain synchronised with the more recent inspection and type approval directives.

  13. Description of current case (1/5) • Austria • Slovakia • Netherlands

  14. Description of current case (2/5) • Austria • Operational since 1 December 2010 • Choice between paper or smartcard for part I only • Part II remains paper • Centrally produced by Austrian Government Printing Office • Maximum validity of paper part I 8 weeks if • smartcard applied for • Only "paper" data on chip • Smartcard sent within two weeks • It is possible for people to read the chip data themselves • with a PC and smartcard reader • No Value Added Services on chip • € 19.80 for each smartcard applied for • http://www.scheckkartenzulassungsschein.at/infos.html

  15. Description of current case (3/5) Slovakia • Implementation in 2010 • Mrs. H. Hanuskova will give her presentation

  16. Description of current case (4/5) Netherlands • 2013: Introduction of Dutch single part vehicle registration card, no paper • Central card issue • Card number in register • Part II to be discontinued, in stead registration pincode and registration report • Partial discontinuation of obligation to present • No conversion of existing documents • Replacement possible on request • Price € 5,- (card and transfer) • Project for implementation is started • In future digital transfer possible

  17. Description of current case (5/5) Netherlands • Processes made clearly understandable • 27 Member States obliged to use Eucaris within the scope of Prüm • Advice: consult export signal in Eucaris for reregistration as fraud prevention measure • Fast motorboat registration • April 2011: introduction certificate of • registration fast motorboat • Card without chip

  18. Conclusions Topic Group V • 3 working cases • Harmonisation directive due for revision • Still reregistration issues, digital information exchange • Smartcard implementation has less high priority than initially thought • Harmonised introduction is difficult; 3 practical situations and all three are different • Many ideas about VAS, but not much in practice • Questionnaire: open regarding processes and a lot of knowledge shared

  19. Recommendations • Reregistration based on smartcard in the light of export: can be moved to Topic group II • Slovakia, Austria and the Netherlands: open to continue sharing knowledge • Keep other countries interested in the subject of SRC, keep updated with developments via EReg secretariat • Use more digital information exchange (Eucaris) • Directive: tackle/maintain a number of subjects: recommendation to European Commission. Initiate from EReg • Harmonise ISO standards for different directives • Sychronise harmonisation directive with more recent inspection and type approval directives

  20. Work to do • EReg 2011 Warsaw: presentation results Topic Group V • Finishing final report • September 2011: last meeting Topic Group V • October 2011: final report and cover letter to EReg members • October 2011: letter to EC with recommendations harmonisation directive (in harmony with Topic Group II)

  21. Questions?? Thank you for your attention!

More Related