Effects of MMM on Performance, Attitudes and Efficacy of Students in Precalculus. Brad Bailey June 3, 2011. Talk Outline. Our Modified Moore Method How “Moore” did we teach? How much experience with this method do we have? Our Study Methodology Results. Our Modified Moore Method.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Effects of MMM on Performance, Attitudes and Efficacy of Students in Precalculus
June 3, 2011
- TE25 (I am confident that I can correctly use the laws of logarithms to solve a logarithmic equations. ) Females agreed more (p = 0.045).
- CALC34 (I will take Calculus within the next three semesters.)
Males agreed more (p = 0.008).
Males agreed more with AB8 –
You have to remember the right answers…
Control students agreed more with AB12- Wrong answers are absolutely wrong …
The total Treatment Group did marginally significantly better than the total Control Group.
n = 101, Mean = 117.7* , SD = 35.31
n = 92, Mean = 124.8*, SD = 34.44
F = 3.09, p = 0.081
*The final exam was out of 200 possible points.