Transportation Regulation in America—Past, Present, and Future
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 68

Francis P. Mulvey Commissioner Surface Transportation Board George Mason University Arlington, VA PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 65 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Transportation Regulation in America—Past, Present, and Future. Francis P. Mulvey Commissioner Surface Transportation Board George Mason University Arlington, VA April 25, 2011. Transportation Regulation. Regulation and its Historical Bases. Legal Bases for Regulation. Common Law.

Download Presentation

Francis P. Mulvey Commissioner Surface Transportation Board George Mason University Arlington, VA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Francis p mulvey commissioner surface transportation board george mason university arlington va

Transportation Regulation in America—Past, Present, and Future

Francis P. Mulvey

Commissioner

Surface Transportation Board

George Mason University

Arlington, VA

April 25, 2011


Transportation regulation

Transportation Regulation

Regulation and its Historical Bases

Legal Bases for Regulation

Common Law

Commerce Clause of the Constitution

Police Powers of the State

Statutory Law


Railroad regulation

Railroad Regulation

  • Modern U.S. railroad industry history can be divided into pre- & post- Staggers Act

  • In the 19th Century railroads expanded rapidly especially after the Civil War

  • However, much abuse of monopoly power led to the passage of the Interstate Commerce Act and other federal regulations

  • Federal regulation ultimately extended to all modes, but proved particularly harmful to railroads


Early railroad regulation

Early Railroad Regulation

  • The Granger Laws

  • Primarily in Upper MidWest

  • Maximum Rate Legislation

  • Pro Rata Clauses

  • Prohibitions against bribes/kickbacks


Early railroad regulation1

Early Railroad Regulation

Problems with the Granger Laws

Munn vs. Illinois

Windom and Cullom Reports

Act to Regulate Commerce 1887


Railroad regulation1

Railroad Regulation

Gibbons vs. Ogden

Provisions of the Act of 1887

Rate reasonableness

Discrimination and Undue Preferences

Long Haul/Short Haul Clause

Pooling Restrictions

Created ICC

Early Problems with the Act

Supreme Court Cases (Councilman vs. Hitchcock, et al.


Railroad regulation2

Railroad Regulation

  • Strengthening the Act

    • Carmack Act

    • Hepburn Act

    • Other Legislative Responses

  • Nationalization of the Railroads


Railroad regulation3

Railroad Regulation

Transport Act of 1920

Problems with Prior Regulation

Incompleteness

Capitalization

Service Adequacy

Labor Disputes

Defects in Regulatory System

Policy of Enforced Competition

Restrictive Regulation


Railroad regulation4

Railroad Regulation

Principal Provisions of the Act of 1920

Rule of Rate Making

Recapture Clause

Division of Joint Rates

Minimum Rate Regulation

Pooling

Consolidation and Acquisitions

Financial Regulation

Intrastate Rates

Abandonments

Joint Terminals

Labor Disputes


Railroad regulation5

Railroad Regulation

Hoch-Smith Resolution of 1925

Railway Labor Act of 1926

Emergency Transport Act of 1933


Early road development

Early Road Development

  • Packhorsemen and Tote Roads

  • Early Turnpikes

  • Federal Involvement – The Cumberland Road

  • Plank Roads

  • The Good Roads Movement


Development of highway system

Development of Highway System

  • Federal Aid Road Act of 1916

  • Highway Act of 1921

  • Eisenhower’s Cross Country Convoy

  • Highway Act of 1956 and the Interstate System

  • The Highway Trust Fund


Interstate highway system

Interstate Highway System


Motor carrier regulation

Motor Carrier Regulation

Three Principal Areas of Motor Carrier Regulation

Highway Protection

Safety

Traditional Economic Regulation

Motor Carrier Act of 1935

Exempt Areas

Incidental Movements by other Modes

Local Transport

Agricultural Commodities


Motor carrier regulation1

Motor Carrier Regulation

Differences Between Railroad and Motor Carrier Regulation

Motor Carrier Regulation More Complicated

Many Exempt Carriers

Large Number of Motor Carriers

Insurance Requirements

No Abandonment Restrictions

No Joint or Through Rate Requirements

No Long Haul/Short haul Clause

ICC had No Power over Intrastate Rates


Motor carrier regulation2

Motor Carrier Regulation

Problems Faced by Regulators

Distinguishing Between Private and “For-hire” Trucking

Distinguishing Between Contract and Common Carriers

Agricultural Exemptions

Entry Considerations

Common Carriers – PCN Test (Public Convenience

and Necessity)

Contract Carriers – Consistent with the Public Interest


Motor carrier regulation3

Motor Carrier Regulation

Rate Regulation - Operating Ratio Standard

Operating Expenses/Operating Revenue

Trucks and Ruinous Competition

Empty Back Haul Problem


Transportation law and regulation

Transportation Law and Regulation

TransportationAct of 1940

-Fair and Impartial Transportation

-Preserve Modal Inherent Advantages

-Eliminate Destructive Competition

-Promote Safe Adequate and EfficientService

-Foster Sound Econ Conditions in Transport

-Encourage Reasonable Rates

-Encourage Just Wages and Good

Working Conditions


Transportation law and regulation1

Transportation Law and Regulation

  • Other Provisions of the Act of 1940

    -Railroad Consolidation

    -Rule of Ratemaking

    -Burden of Proof in Railroad Rate Cases

    -Water Carrier Regulation


Water carrier regulation

Water Carrier Regulation

Included in Transport Act of 1940

Included Because They Were in Distress

Made Subject to Long Haul/Short Haul Clause

Made Subject to Rules Governing Consolidation

Many Exemptions - 90 percent Exempt

Bulk Commodities When Less Than 3 in Tow

Bulk Liquids

Contract Carriage


Navigable waterways

Navigable Waterways


Air transport regulation

Air Transport Regulation

Earliest Government Involvement – Mail Contracts

Immediate Rationale for Economic Regulation

Safety

Financial Crisis

Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938

Public Convenience and Necessity Must be Shown for Entry

Rates and Fares Must be Published

Rates Can be Prescribed When Existing Found Unlawful

Authority over Mergers

Created Civil Aeronautics Board


Public promotion of air transport

Public Promotion of Air Transport

  • Post War Development of the Airlines

  • Air Traffic Control

  • Airport Improvement Program

  • Essential Air Service Program

  • CRAF Program

  • Aviation Trust Fund

  • State and Local Support for Terminals


Us transportation under regulation

US Transportation Under Regulation

  • Restricted Entry

  • Low Rates of Returns for some modes

  • Relatively Rigid Rates

  • Regulatory Lag

  • Regulatory Mentality

  • Restrictions on Innovations


Motor carrier deregulation

Motor Carrier Deregulation

  • Condition of Motor Carriers under Regulation

    • Wasteful – empty backhauls

    • Uneconomic – excess capacity

    • Inefficient carriers

    • Protected –entry limits


Motor carrier deregulation1

Motor Carrier Deregulation

  • Opposition to Regulatory Reform

    • Organized Labor

    • Trucking Companies

    • Shippers happy with service quality

  • Triumph of the Economists


Motor carrier deregulation2

Motor Carrier Deregulation

Motor Carrier Act of 1980

On Entry– Burden of Proof on Protestor

Fit Willing and Able Test

Elimination of Operating Restrictions

Greater Pricing Freedom

Contract Carriers get Common Carrier

Certificates

Rates must still be filed with ICC


Motor carrier deregulation3

Motor Carrier Deregulation

Intercity Bus Industry

Condition Under Regulation

Low ROI

Losing Traffic to Air and Auto and

to Amtrak

Uneconomic Traffic


Motor carrier deregulation4

Motor Carrier Deregulation

Bus Regulatory Reform Act of 1982

Eliminated Rate and Entry Regulation

Eliminated Requirement to offer

Regular Route Service to Gain Charter

Authority

Preempted State Regulation

..


Motor carrier deregulation aftermath

Motor Carrier Deregulation-Aftermath

Undercharge Issue

Effect on Trucking Labor Organization

Rise of Independent Owner-Operators

Bus Industry Performed Poorer than

Other Modes Following Deregulation

Bus Focus on Charter and Tourism Traffic


Airline deregulation

Airline Deregulation

Condition of the Industry Under Regulation

Low Profits

High Costs

High Fares

Stagnant Growth

Wasteful Service Competition


Airline deregulation1

Airline Deregulation

Experience in Intrastate Markets

Theory of Contestable Markets

Air Cargo Deregulation in 1977

Opposition of Labor, Some Large Carriers


Airline deregulation2

Airline Deregulation

Airline Deregulation Act of 1978

Provided for Phasing in of New Entry

and Rate Freedom

Eased exit restrictions

Abolished CAB by 1985

Alfred Kahn Accelerated the Process


Airline deregulation3

Airline Deregulation

Immediate Aftermath of Deregulation

New Entrants

Falling Market Share of Legacy Carriers

Bankruptcies and Mergers

Falling Fares

External Events—Oil Embargo,

Patco Strike, Inflationary Pressures


Aftermath of airline deregulation

Aftermath of Airline Deregulation

Response of the Legacy Carriers

Competitive Strategies and Barriers

to Entry

--Physical Barriers—Hubs, Slots, Gates and Noise Restrictions

--Marketing Barriers—Frequent Flyer Programs, CRS’s, Travel Agent Commissions, Code Sharing


Airlines today

Airlines Today

  • Re-emergence of Some Legacy Airlines

  • Success of Some Low Cost Carriers

  • Decline in Role of Travel Agents

  • Recurring Financial Crises

  • Aftermath of 9/11

  • Global Alliances


Railroad deregulation

Railroad Deregulation

  • Condition of the Railroad Industry

    • ROI

    • Market Share Trends

    • Deferred Maintenance

    • Bankruptcies

    • Subsidized Competition and Uneven Regulation

    • Low Labor Productivity and Work Rules


Railroad deregulation1

Railroad Deregulation

  • Three R Act of 1973

  • Four R Act of 1976

    • Reduced ICC Regulation to cases of market dominance

    • Exempt from regulation if not in public interest

    • ICC develop standards of Revenue Adequacy

      Freedom from Obligation to carry Passengers--AMTRAK


Amtrak system map

Amtrak System Map


Railroad industry pre staggers

Railroad Industry Pre-Staggers

  • 40 Class I Railroads

  • 9 Railroads bankrupt

  • Industry-wide low return-on-investment

  • Railroads unable to raise capital

  • Railroads faced steadily declining market share

  • Regulation prevented RRs from any flexibility in pricing to compete with other modes

  • Carriers could not abandon redundant or light density lines to cut costs

  • Rates could not cover inflation due to regulatory lag in rate adjustments


Railroad deregulation2

Railroad Deregulation

  • StaggersRail Act of 1980

    • Maximum Rates only in Absence of Comp.

    • Threshold Revenue/Variable Cost Ratio

    • 180 percent

    • Revenue Adequacy a Factor in Rate Reasonableness

    • ICC can’t consider impacts on othermodes from a rate change


Railroad deregulation3

Railroad Deregulation

Interstate Commerce Commission

Termination Act of 1995

Creation of Surface Transportation Board

STB’s Limited Regulatory Role

Rationalization of the Rail Network


Railroad deregulation4

Railroad Deregulation

  • Staggers Act of 1980 (cont’d)

  • Allowed RR’s to enter into contract rates

  • Allowed surcharges on light density lines when revenues are inadequate

  • Time limits of ICC proceedings

  • Expanded ICC power to exempt categoies of traffic from regulation


Growth decline of class i rr miles

Growth & Decline of Class I RR Miles


Railroad roi 1970 2009

Railroad ROI 1970-2009

46


Railroad employment 1939 2009

Railroad Employment 1939-2009

1,670,000

1,151,000

47


Railroad industry cost of capital and roi 1996 2009

Railroad Industry Cost of Capital and ROI 1996-2009


Class i capital expenditures 1994 2010

Class I Capital Expenditures 1994 - 2010

Billions

Total

Roadway & Structures

Equipment


Since staggers

Since Staggers

  • Rail industry freight traffic ton-mile market share

    has increased from 30.3% in 1980 to 43% in 2010

  • Rail rates down 55% on average (inflation

    adjusted)

    -Some year-to-year increases in last decade (2000-2006 up 3.5%, 2008 up 14.5%)

  • Railroads’ ROI increased

  • Railroads substantially increased investment in infrastructure

  • Improvement in safety performance


Modal markets shares

Modal Markets Shares


The railroad industry today

The Railroad Industry Today

  • 7 Class I Railroads

  • 525 Class II and Class III railroads

  • Much reduced system through rationalization

  • Average length of haul – 919 miles (2009)


Intermodal shipments 1965 2010

Intermodal Shipments 1965-2010

Total

Containers

Trailers


New regulatory regime

New Regulatory Regime

  • STB replaces ICC in 1995

  • Three member board—non-partisan

  • Railroad rate and service disputes

  • Railroad restructuring (M&A)

  • Limited jurisdiction over other modes

  • Much railroad traffic exempt from STB regulation

  • STB regulates where market dominance exists--180% r/vc threshold


Early experience at the stb

Early Experience at the STB

  • Board tries to balance shipper desire for low rates and railroads’ need to earn profits

  • Early on, Board looked favorably on railroad mergers

  • Perception among shippers that STB was too pro-railroad


Changes in stb practices and procedures

Changes in STB Practices and Procedures

  • New Approaches to Handling Rate Cases

  • Review of Carrier Operating Practices

  • Railroad Restructuring

  • Environmental Reviews

  • Potential Legislative Changes Affecting the STB and/or the Railroad Industry


New approaches to rate cases

New Approaches to Rate Cases

  • Streamlined procedures to reduce time and cost for adjudicating large rate cases

  • First large rate cases handled under new guidelines

  • Guidelines for situations where value of case is too small to justify full blown STB litigation

  • Simplified stand alone cost and three benchmark approaches

  • First cases brought under new small rate guidelines


Rail rate cases at the stb

Rail Rate Cases at the STB

  • Much railroad traffic exempt from STB rate regulation

  • Shippers often claimed rate cases took too long and cost too much to bring

  • Many shippers felt they had no access to STB’s processes for rate relief

  • Congress directed the Board to develop procedures for small rate cases


Recent activities at the stb

Recent Activities at the STB

  • Streamlined procedures to reduce time and cost for adjudicating large rate cases—Court of Appeals upheld

  • First large rate cases handled under new guidelines—AEP North Texas, Western Fuels, KCPL

  • Major shipper “win” in Western Fuels

  • Major case involving DuPont and CSX resolved through STB facilitated mediation


Simplified standards for small rail rate cases

Simplified Standards for “Small” Rail Rate Cases

STB Decision – September 5, 2007

Provides access to the rate reasonableness process for all sizes of rail rate disputes, and in particular, to the estimated 73% of challengeable rail traffic for which the large rate case process would be financially impracticable

Requires, for all rail rate disputes, mandatory, nonbinding mediation—a mechanism that has been used successfully in previous cases to arrive at negotiated settlements


Simplified standards for rail rate cases

Simplified Standards for Rail Rate Cases

Allows rail customers to choose the methodology that is most appropriate for consideration for their complaint:

A rail customer choosing the simplest approach, the “Three-Benchmark” methodology, is eligible to recover up to $1 million over a 5-year period.

A rail customer choosing the “Simplified Stand-Alone Cost” methodology is eligible to recover up to $5 million over a 5-year period

Court upheld shipper challenge to maximum recovery levels


Experience with small rate case guidelines

Experience with Small Rate Case Guidelines

  • First Cases brought by DuPont

  • Six lines of traffic found market dominant

  • DuPont eventually won lower rates for 3 lines of traffic

  • Cases were appealed, then settled


Review of carrier operating practices

Review of Carrier Operating Practices

  • STB and the railroads’ common carrier obligation

  • Changes on “paper barriers”

  • STB’s fuel surcharge decision

  • STB-sponsored studies of RR competition and capacity

  • STB response to Clean Railroads Act

  • New responsibilities in passenger rail areas


Railroad restructuring

Railroad Restructuring

  • STB’s Revised Merger Guidelines

  • The Board’s Classification of Railroad Mergers

  • Canadian Pacific’s Acquisition of the DM&E--Significant

  • Canadian National’s Acquisition of the EJ&E—Highly Controversial


Environmental reviews

Environmental Reviews

  • Overall responsibility for environmental review

    of new railroad construction or abandonments

  • DM&E Powder River Basin expansion project

    and the IC&E

  • Yucca Mountain spent nuclear material

    storage site

  • Environmental review of the CN acquisition of

    the EJ&E


Changes in the stb s practices and procedures

Changes in the STB’s Practices and Procedures

  • Rail cost of capital methodology revision

    and examination of multi-stage discounted cash flow model

  • Rail Energy Transportation Advisory Council (RETAC)

  • Reorganization of Consumer Protection and Enforcement and Public Affairs Sections

  • Reforming the Uniform Rail Costing System


Pending legislation involving the stb

Pending Legislation Involving the STB

Senate legislation proposes to

Reauthorize the STB

Change how the railroad industry is regulated

Proposed Removal of Railroad Antitrust Exemptions

Rail Investment tax credits


Francis p mulvey commissioner surface transportation board george mason university arlington va

Thank you, any questions


  • Login