1 / 23

OPSM 405 Service Management

Ko ç Un iversity. OPSM 405 Service Management. Class 23: Performance Evaluation: Introduction to DEA. Zeynep Aksin zaksin @ku.edu.tr. Announcement. Class on Monday May 12 will be held in the lab SOS Z12 Last case assignment due Wednesday May 14: Nashville National Bank.

taryn
Download Presentation

OPSM 405 Service Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Koç University OPSM 405 Service Management Class 23: Performance Evaluation: Introduction to DEA Zeynep Aksin zaksin@ku.edu.tr

  2. Announcement • Class on Monday May 12 will be held in the lab SOS Z12 • Last case assignment due Wednesday May 14: Nashville National Bank

  3. Last case assignment • Answer the questions: • Do you agree with Ann’s analysis? Why or why not? • If you were to redesign the analysis, what inputs and outputs would you use? Why? Explain specifically. You can also suggest new alternatives. • What are the strengths and weaknesses of this analysis? • Now take an appropriate subset of the inputs and outputs used by Ann and perform a DEA analysis using Excel Solver. Report efficiencies of the units and values of the optimal input and output weights you have chosen.

  4. Performance Evaluation • Services are provided through multiple sites • Each site provides similar services • Example: branches of a bank, Starbucks stores • As managers we want to understand • How each site is performing… • Who performs better… • Who performs worse…

  5. Productivity measurement • Operating ratios (e.g. man-hr/transaction) • Financial approaches (e.g. conversion to Euros)

  6. Conceptually ... Productivity = Outputs Inputs Productivity

  7. A graphical view: who is efficient? 3 4 6 2 7 5 Inputs Outputs 1 2 1 2 4 5 3 7 7 4 9 7 5 5 3 6 10 6 7 4.5 4.5 1

  8. Traditional efficiency: who is efficient? 3 4 6 2 7 5 1 Inputs Outputs Ratio 1 2 1 0.5 2 4 5 1.25 3 7 7 1.0 4 9 7 0.77 5 5 3 0.6 6 10 6 0.6 7 4.5 4.5 1.0

  9. Frontier efficiency: who is efficient? 3 4 2 6 7 5 Inputs Outputs 1 2 1 2 4 5 3 7 7 4 9 7 5 5 3 6 10 6 7 4.5 4.5 1

  10. Conceptually ... Productivity = Outputs Inputs Productivity Reality is more complex ... Inputs Outputs Technology + Decision Making equipment #type A cust. facility space #type B cust. server labor quality index mgmt. labor $ oper. profit

  11. Operating Units Differ • Mix of customers served • Availability and cost of inputs • Facility configuration • Processes/practices used • Examples • bank branches, retail stores, clinics, schools, etc. Questions: • How do we compare productivity of a diverse set of operating units serving a diverse set of markets? • What are the “best practice” and under-performing units? • What are the trade-offs among inputs and outputs? • Where are the improvement opportunities and how big are they?

  12. Extending to multiple outputs ... Ex: Consider 8 M.D.’s working at an hospital for the same 160 hrs. in a month. Each performs exams and surgeries. Which ones are most “productive”? There is some “efficient” trade-off between the number of surgeries and exams that any one M.D. can do in a month, but what is it?

  13. #6 #1 Scatter plot of outputs: efficient frontier These points are dominated by #1 and #6. “Pareto-Koopman efficiency” along the frontier - cannot increase an output (or decrease an input) without compensating decrease in other outputs (or increase in other inputs).

  14. Performance “gap” 73.4% of distance to frontier How bad are the inefficient M.D.s and where are the gaps? #5 Efficiency score = 73.4%

  15. DEA uses an efficient frontier to define multiple I/O productivity • Frontier defines the (observed) efficient trade-off among inputs and outputs within a set of DMUs. • Relative distance to the frontier defines efficiency • “Nearest point” on frontier defines an efficient comparison unit (hypothetical comparison unit (HCU)) • Differences in inputs and output between DMU and HCU define productivity “gaps” (improvement potential) How do we do this analysis systematically?

  16. DEA: basic assumptions • Multiple units • Common inputs and outputs • can be quantitative or qualitative measures • do not need to have market valuation • however need consistency • include environmental factors to capture differences… • … yet not too many to ensure effective discrimination

  17. DEA: the basic idea • One input, one output: • efficiency = output / input • multiple inputs, multiple outputs: • efficiency = weighted sum of outputs / weighted sum of inputs • how do you determine the weights • ad-hoc techniques • DEA: LP; assume each unit has its own value system • a strictly relative notion of efficiency

  18. How does it work? For each unit solve: max my unit’s efficiency st. efficiency score for all other units < 1 by varying my weights on inputs and outputs where: efficiency = sum of weighted outputs sum of weighted inputs

  19. In words • Imagine your own unit • You are searching over all possible weights • You stop either when your own unit’s efficiency is 1: you are efficient • Or when with the selected weights one or more of the other units have reached efficiency 1: you are inefficient • In latter case: the other units with efficiency 1 constitute your peer (reference) group • Linear programming is a systematic way of performing the above described search

  20. How do we evaluate these variables ? LP Formulation: Data Model variables

  21. Another way of saying the same thing max my unit’s weighted outputs st. weighted outputs < weighted inputs or (weighted outputs - weighted inputs < 0) my weighted sum of inputs = 1 by varying my weights on inputs and outputs where: efficiency = sum of weighted outputs sum of weighted inputs

  22. More formally

  23. Remember: next class in SOS Z12!

More Related