Ohio s experience with ayp
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 30

Ohio’s Experience with AYP PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 108 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Ohio’s Experience with AYP. Presentation to the American Educational Research Association Mitchell D. Chester April 12, 2004. Pre-Implementation Concerns. Over-identification Accountability for students with disabilities Volatility of results. Presentation Outline.

Download Presentation

Ohio’s Experience with AYP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Ohio s experience with ayp

Ohio’s Experience with AYP

Presentation to the American Educational Research Association

Mitchell D. Chester

April 12, 2004


Pre implementation concerns

Pre-Implementation Concerns

  • Over-identification

  • Accountability for students with disabilities

  • Volatility of results


Presentation outline

Presentation Outline

  • Ohio’s accountability system

  • 2002-03 AYP results

  • Measures employed to increase validity and reliability

  • Conclusions


Ohio s accountability system

Ohio’s Accountability System

  • School and district rating criteria

  • 2002-03 results


Ohio rating criteria

Ohio Rating Criteria


Ohio rating criteria1

Ohio Rating Criteria


Ohio rating criteria2

Ohio Rating Criteria


Ohio rating criteria3

Ohio Rating Criteria


Ohio rating criteria4

Ohio Rating Criteria


District designations

District Designations


School designations

School Designations


2002 03 ayp results

2002-03 AYP Results

  • AYP within rating categories

  • School Improvement within rating categories

  • Disentangling the AYP categories


Ayp within ohio s rating categories

AYP within Ohio’s Rating Categories


Ayp within ohio s rating categories1

AYP within Ohio’s Rating Categories


Ayp within ohio s rating categories2

AYP within Ohio’s Rating Categories


Ayp within ohio s rating categories3

AYP within Ohio’s Rating Categories


Ayp within ohio s rating categories4

AYP within Ohio’s Rating Categories


School improvement within ohio s rating categories

School Improvement within Ohio’s Rating Categories


Ayp categories

AYP Categories


Ayp categories1

AYP Categories


Ayp categories2

AYP Categories


Ayp categories3

AYP Categories


Ayp students with disabilities

AYP & Students with Disabilities


Ayp limited english proficient students

AYP & Limited English Proficient Students


Measures employed to increase validity and reliability

Measures Employed to Increase Validity and Reliability

  • Safe Harbor

  • Averaging

  • Other


Ayp impact of safe harbor

AYP: Impact of Safe Harbor


Ayp impact of averaging

AYP: Impact of Averaging


Other measures

Other Measures

  • Tests of statistical significance

  • Confidence intervals

  • Minimum N


Conclusions

Conclusions

  • 2002-03 AYP impact was lowest of pre-implementation estimates

  • Participation was not an issue

  • Need better understanding of false positives / false negatives


Conclusions continued

Conclusions (continued)

  • Volatility of results needs careful attention

  • Consequential validity is the “main event”


  • Login