Ohio s experience with ayp
Sponsored Links
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 30

Ohio’s Experience with AYP PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 129 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Ohio’s Experience with AYP. Presentation to the American Educational Research Association Mitchell D. Chester April 12, 2004. Pre-Implementation Concerns. Over-identification Accountability for students with disabilities Volatility of results. Presentation Outline.

Download Presentation

Ohio’s Experience with AYP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Ohio’s Experience with AYP

Presentation to the American Educational Research Association

Mitchell D. Chester

April 12, 2004


Pre-Implementation Concerns

  • Over-identification

  • Accountability for students with disabilities

  • Volatility of results


Presentation Outline

  • Ohio’s accountability system

  • 2002-03 AYP results

  • Measures employed to increase validity and reliability

  • Conclusions


Ohio’s Accountability System

  • School and district rating criteria

  • 2002-03 results


Ohio Rating Criteria


Ohio Rating Criteria


Ohio Rating Criteria


Ohio Rating Criteria


Ohio Rating Criteria


District Designations


School Designations


2002-03 AYP Results

  • AYP within rating categories

  • School Improvement within rating categories

  • Disentangling the AYP categories


AYP within Ohio’s Rating Categories


AYP within Ohio’s Rating Categories


AYP within Ohio’s Rating Categories


AYP within Ohio’s Rating Categories


AYP within Ohio’s Rating Categories


School Improvement within Ohio’s Rating Categories


AYP Categories


AYP Categories


AYP Categories


AYP Categories


AYP & Students with Disabilities


AYP & Limited English Proficient Students


Measures Employed to Increase Validity and Reliability

  • Safe Harbor

  • Averaging

  • Other


AYP: Impact of Safe Harbor


AYP: Impact of Averaging


Other Measures

  • Tests of statistical significance

  • Confidence intervals

  • Minimum N


Conclusions

  • 2002-03 AYP impact was lowest of pre-implementation estimates

  • Participation was not an issue

  • Need better understanding of false positives / false negatives


Conclusions (continued)

  • Volatility of results needs careful attention

  • Consequential validity is the “main event”


  • Login