1 / 37

State Compensatory Education

State Compensatory Education. March 1, 2018 9:00 – 4:00. Intent and Purpose of the SCE Program. Programs and/or services designed to supplement the regular education program for identified at-risk students

taran
Download Presentation

State Compensatory Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. State Compensatory Education March 1, 2018 9:00 – 4:00

  2. Intent and Purpose of the SCE Program Programs and/or services designed to supplementthe regular education program for identified at-risk students • The goal for SCE is to reduce the disparity in performance on (a) the state assessment and (b) rates of high school completion between students at-risk of dropping out of school and all other district students. • Activities and expenses must directly impact students Region 16 Education Service Center

  3. Key Players in the State Compensatory Education Program School Districts Administrators Business Personnel Program Coordinator PEIMS Clerk Counselors Classroom Teachers Parents • Education Service Centers • SCE Consultants • PEIMS • Curriculum Specialists • Counselors Contact Region 16 Education Service Center Legislators Texas Education Agency

  4. Purpose of Identification Process • To determine eligibility of students to receive supplemental educational services • To ensure that the intended beneficiaries are receiving needed support or assistance Region 16 Education Service Center

  5. Supplement, Not Supplant • Any program activity, program personnel, or program materials required by federal law, state law, or State Board of Education rule may not be funded with SCE funds. • SCE funds must be used to provide support programs and/or services that supplement the regular education program so that students at risk of dropping out of school can succeed in school. Region 16 Education Service Center

  6. At-Risk Student Eligibility CriteriaIncludes each student under the age of 26 who: 5. Is pregnantor is a parent http://tea.texas.gov/Texas_Schools/Safe_and_Healthy_Schools/Pregnancy_Related_Services/ Region 16 Education Service Center

  7. Student Attendance Accountability Handbook http://tea.texas.gov/Finance_and_Grants/Financial_Compliance/Student__Attendance_Accounting_Handbook/ Region 16 Education Service Center

  8. Local Student Eligibility • Must be adopted by the local Board of Trustees • Adopted criteria must be clearly defined in the DIP for districts or the instructional plan for charter schools • Number may not exceed 10% of the number of students who received services during the preceding school year • Students identified using local criteria are not reported through PEIMS Region 16 Education Service Center

  9. Local Student Eligibility(continued) • MUST document the need for the specific supplemental services or supplemental instruction in its comprehensive needs assessment and the D/CIP • Need must be identified prior to providing the specified supplemental services or supplemental instruction to locally identified at-risk students. Note:The SCE allotment may not be used to provide services on a campus that does not have any state identified at-risk students Region 16 Education Service Center

  10. Program Evaluation is Required • How do we know if the SCE program is: • Making progress? • Achieving results? • Keep in mind that resources for educational programs are limited. • Programs that can document their success in having an impact on their students and in using resources efficiently and effectively will be at an advantage for ongoing funding. Region 16 Education Service Center

  11. Evaluation Should Help Determine the Following: • Changes made to the program • Tools used to evaluate program • Effectiveness of program • Major successes • Will this program be implemented on the campus next year? Region 16 Education Service Center

  12. Primary Source of Documentation for SCE Program • The D/CIP is auditable documentation and is the primary record supporting expenditures attributed to SCE and Title I Programs. • The D/CIP must be developed, evaluated and revised annually. Region 16 Education Service Center

  13. District and Campus Improvement Plan Requirements • Total amount of SCE funds allocated for resources and staff • Actual dollar amounts for activities and SCE funds that show 52% of allotment (Direct costs) • Cumulative summary of program and entire budgetin the District Improvement Plan (DIP) • Specific campus activities and campus budget in the Campus Improvement Plan (CIP) Region 16 Education Service Center

  14. District and Campus Improvement Plan Requirements • Supplemental FTEs (Full Time Equivalents) for State Comp Ed - shown for SCE activities involving personnel at both the district and campus level • Total amount of State Comp Ed funds allocated for resources and staff • Supplemental financial resources for State Comp Ed - indication of the approximate dollar amounts for activities and/or strategies Region 16 Education Service Center

  15. District and Campus Improvement Plan Requirements • Identified strategies – specific strategies aligned with the comprehensive needs assessment • Measurable performance objectives - based on needs assessment data and stated in terms of what the student is expected to do, and stated in terms of measurable and/or observable behavior to ensure that the plan is resulting in academic improvement • Timelines for monitoring strategies and reaching goals – specific schedule for data collection during the school year. This should be written in incremental units such as every three weeks, every month, (not August though May or “ongoing”), each semester, etc. Region 16 Education Service Center

  16. District and Campus Improvement Plan Requirements • Formative evaluation criteria – the assessment of progress during instruction - for purposes of determining whether students are learning or whether the instruction needs to be modified • Formative evaluation answers the question, Is the student learning, and if not, what needs to be changed? • The purpose of formative evaluation is to inform instruction and enable intervention when a student is not progressing. This evaluation strategy is especially important for at-risk students. Region 16 Education Service Center

  17. District and Campus Improvement Plan Requirements • Summative evaluation takes place after instruction. • Summative evaluation answers the question Has the student learned? • The purpose of summative evaluation is to judge or grade thesuccess of the strategy. Region 16 Education Service Center

  18. Required Policies and Procedures • Districts, including charter schools, receiving SCE funding are required to have written policies and procedures describing the following: • Students at-risk of dropping out of school • Students at risk of dropping out of school under local criteria and documentation of compliance with 10% cap • How students are entered and exited from the SCE program • The methodologies involving the calculation of 110% satisfactory performance on all assessment instruments • The cost of the regular education program in relation to the budget allocations per student and/or instructional staff ratio of the SCE program Region 16 Education Service Center

  19. Region 16 Education Service Center

  20. Region 16 Education Service Center

  21. Region 16 Education Service Center

  22. Region 16 Education Service Center

  23. Region 16 Education Service Center

  24. Region 16 Education Service Center

  25. Region 16 Education Service Center

  26. Region 16 Education Service Center

  27. Region 16 Education Service Center

  28. Region 16 Education Service Center

  29. Region 16 Education Service Center

  30. Region 16 Education Service Center

  31. Region 16 Education Service Center

  32. Region 16 Education Service Center

  33. Region 16 Education Service Center

  34. Region 16 Education Service Center

  35. Documentation of the SCE Program • Timeline for identification process • Notification of teachers and other stakeholders • Existing policies • Timeline for monitoring and updating documentation for at-risk students • The reason for identification should have documentation from source (example: STAAR report, grade report, home language survey, etc.) • Retention of records • Storage of records • Access to records Region 16 Education Service Center

  36. Common Audit Findings for SCE • Lack of documentation • No evaluation of SCE program • At-Risk students incorrectly identified • Lack of supporting documentation in district/campus plans • Fundingstate-mandated rules, programs, or positions • Lack of policies and procedures outlining the SCE program Region 16 Education Service Center

  37. Vickie Ansley Coordinator, Federal Programs Region 16 Education Service Center (806) 677-5134 vickie.ansley@esc16.net Region 16 Education Service Center

More Related