1 / 29

Medical Professional Liability

Medical Professional Liability. Melissa L. Greiner PHICO Group, Inc. September 19, 2000. Medical Professional Liability. Changing patient expectations Financial condition of hospitals Ancillary coverages Directors and Officers Liability Employment Practices Liability.

taran
Download Presentation

Medical Professional Liability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Medical Professional Liability Melissa L. Greiner PHICO Group, Inc. September 19, 2000

  2. Medical Professional Liability • Changing patient expectations • Financial condition of hospitals • Ancillary coverages • Directors and Officers Liability • Employment Practices Liability

  3. Changing Patient Expectations Trends in liability are the result of: • Improvements in medicine and technology • Advertisement • Effect of media • Lottery mentality

  4. Financial Condition of Hospitals • Competition for patient business • Shift of surgical procedures to outpatient facilities • Mergers, acquisitions, divorces

  5. Financial Condition of Hospitals (cont) • Increased costs of malpractice coverage • Balanced Budget Act of 1997 • Pressure from other 3rd party payers • All of the above are resulting in: DECREASED INCOME

  6. Impact on Hospital Insurance • Medical malpractice coverage impacts more obvious • Souring financials may lead to more losses for ancillary coverages, even in non-profit sector • Directors and Officers Liability • Employment Practices Liability

  7. Directors and Officers Covers claims for wrongful acts committed by corporate directors, officers, agents (physicians) for their corporate decisions i.e., for alleged breach of obligations to the organization or for their actions and decisions on behalf of the organization

  8. Directors & Officers Duties • Duty of Diligence - managing assets • Duty of Loyalty - no personal gain or conflict of interest with organization • Duty of Obedience - in accordance with statutes and terms of charter

  9. Directors & Officers Coverage • No two insurance companies use exact same rating formula • Potential variation in estimated premium between two organizations with same ownership, class of business and size • As many as 80 variations of the D&O form exist in today’s marketplace • Exposurebase varies as well

  10. Directors & Officers Coverage • Exposure bases: • Assets, Revenues • Number of Ds and Os • Number of Employees • “Pure” Claims-Made • Defense costs within limits of liability

  11. D&O Coverage Evolution • Specifically for non-profit D&O, previously did not have: • Entity coverage • Employment Practices cover • Duty to Defend provision • Recent study reports two-thirds of D&O insureds purchase EPLI endorsement * * Source: Tillinghast-Towers Perrin

  12. Directors & Officers • Claimants may include: • Shareholders * • Employees * • Competitors • Customers • Government

  13. Employment Practices Liability • Claimants may include: • Full-time and part-time employees • Leased and temporary workers • Former employees • Applicant for employment

  14. Healthcare D&O / EPLI • How are coverages unique to the health care industry? • How do claimants differ in the health care industry? • How are allegations different in the health care industry?

  15. Healthcare D&O / EPLI • Higher ratio of non-profit entities • D&O often written with staff privileges protection • Coverages generally written on a smaller scale • Lower Limits of Liability • Lower exposure counts

  16. D&O Industry Needs Source: Tillinghast-Towers Perrin

  17. D&O Industry Needs Source: Tillinghast-Towers Perrin

  18. Healthcare D&O / EPLI • Wide exposure variance within healthcare continuum • Large hospitals with significant exposure and financial history • First-time purchasers in the form of newly formed practices, offices, clinics • Newer entrants to the D&O market present more underwriting challenges

  19. Healthcare D&O / EPLI • Common Claimants: • Employees / Health Care Providers • Government • Competitors • Customers (patients) • Shareholders (if publicly traded provider)

  20. Healthcare D&O / EPLI • Common Claim Allegations: • Employment Issues • Antitrust • Fraud and Abuse • Breach of contract • Libel, slander, defamation

  21. Employment Issues • Largest source of claims in health care D&O • Various ways to offer EPLI coverage • implicitly covered in D&O • endorsed onto D&O policy as sublimit • offered as separate coverage with separate limits

  22. Employment Issues • Mergers and acquisitions of hospitals, health plans and/or managed care could result in terminations or reassignment • As revenues shrink, facilities (and employees) are downsized • Credentialing physicians to determine privileges

  23. Employment Practices Liability • Common Claim Allegations: • Wrongful termination or demotion • Harassment, coercion, discrimination • Negligent evaluation or reassignment • Wrongful refusal to employ qualified applicant • Negligent hiring practices

  24. Antitrust Within the context of attempting to control or monopolize: • Hospital denies medical staff appointment • Competing hospitals decide to merge or share services / assets • Non-affiliated providers commit collusion to affect reimbursement fees

  25. Fraud & Abuse • False claims and billings • Over-utilization of claims for medically unnecessary services • Illegal remuneration in return for referral of business • Fraud by institutions - submission of false cost reports

  26. Industry Loss Ratios

  27. Reserving Considerations • Health care organizations are at greatest risk of being sued • Length of tail in private sector unknown due to wide variability in risk exposure • Low frequency, high severity

  28. Reserving Considerations • Severity in private, non profit sector is a BIG UNKNOWN • Rules out frequency/severity projection techniques • Traditional link-ratio methods appropriate for insurers with history • Change in exposure base or risk type presents challenges

  29. Reserving Considerations • Projection methods (i.e. BF) may be more suitable • Actuary must know and understand: • Coverages • Exposures • Uniqueness of own product, relative to the industry • No cookbook formula!

More Related