Special education state performance plan annual performance report
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 33

Special Education State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 88 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Special Education State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report. Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009. SPP/APR: Overview. State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report.

Download Presentation

Special Education State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Special education state performance plan annual performance report

Special EducationState Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

Accountability Conference

Education Service Center, Region 20

September 16, 2009


Spp apr overview

SPP/APR: Overview


Special education state performance plan annual performance report

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

IDEA 2004 requires each State to develop a six-year performance plan (2005-2010).

  • The State Performance Plan (SPP) evaluates the State’s efforts to implement the requirements and purposes of IDEA and illustrates how the State will continuously improve upon this implementation.

  • States will submit on an annual basis to the USDE Office of Special Education Programs an annual performance report (APR) and report publicly the performance of districts against the targets in the APR

  • Performance on compliance indicators used in LEA Determinations

For more information on this subject, visit the TEA Website at:http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/special.ed/spp/index.html


Special education state performance plan annual performance report

SPP/APR

IN for FFY 2008 APR due Feb 2010

Indicator 1: Graduation

Indicator 2: Dropout

Indicator 3A-C: Adequate Yearly Progress

Indicator 4A: Suspension/Expulsion

Indicator 5: LRE, 6-21

Indicator 7: Early Childhood Outcomes

Indicator 8: Parent Participation

Indicator 9/10: Disproportionate Representation

Indicator 11: Timely Initial Evaluation

Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition


Special education state performance plan annual performance report

SPP/APR

Out for FFY 2008 APR due Feb 2010

Indicator 4B: Suspension/Expulsion (Race/Ethnicity)

Indicator 6: LRE, 3-5

Indicator 13: Secondary Transition

Indicator 14: Post School Outcomes


Spp apr looking forward

SPP/APR:Looking Forward


State performance plan annual performance report

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

  • Must use graduation rate calculation established by USDE under Title 1 of the ESEA, as reported to the Department of Education under Title 1.

  • Must use annual graduation rate targets under Title 1 of the ESEA FFY 2008 (2008-09) due Feb 2010

Indicator 1: % graduating with a regular diploma

Note:Title 1 adjusted cohort graduation rate goes into effect in 2010-11

No change in PEIMS data collection

Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010


State performance plan annual performance report1

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

  • Must use the dropout data used in the ESEA graduation rate calculation, as reported to the Department of Education under Title 1.

Indicator 2: % dropping out of high school

Note:Title 1 adjusted cohort graduation rate goes into effect in 2010-11

No change in PEIMS data collection

Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010


State performance plan annual performance report2

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

  • Meet State’s AYP Targets

  • Participation Rate

  • Proficiency Rate

Indicator 3: Participation and Proficiency on statewide assessments

No change in assessment data collection

Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010


State performance plan annual performance report3

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

Change to methodology on determining a ‘significant discrepancy’ in the rate of suspension and expulsion of greater than 10 days in a school year for children with IEPs.

Indicator 4A: Rate of Suspension and Expulsion

No change in PEIMS data collection

Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010


State performance plan annual performance report4

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

Indicator 4B: Rate of Suspension and Expulsion (by Race/Ethnicity)

No change in PEIMS data collectionNo APR reporting in Feb 2010

Report in FFY 2009 SPP due Feb 1, 2011


State performance plan annual performance report5

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

  • Inside the regular class 80% or more of the day;

  • Inside the regular class less than 40% of the day; and

  • In separate schools, residential facilities, or homebound/ hospital placements.

Indicator 5: % of children with IEPs aged 6-21 served:

No change in PEIMS data collection

Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010


State performance plan annual performance report6

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

  • Regular early childhood program and receiving the majority of special education and related services in the regular early childhood program; and

  • Separate special education class, separate school or residential facility.

Indicator 6: % of children with IEPs aged 3-5 attending:

No change in PEIMS data collection (yet)No APR reporting in 2010

Report in FFY 2009 SPP due Feb 1, 2011


State performance plan annual performance report7

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

  • Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships)

  • Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy); and

  • Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs.

Indicator 7: % of preschool children with IEPs aged 3-5 who demonstrate:

No change in SPP7 data collection

Report Baseline and Targets inFFY 2008 SPP due Feb 1, 2010


State performance plan annual performance report8

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

  • Increased number of surveys distributed

  • Public reporting on district performance

Indicator 8: % of parents who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for students with disabilities.

No change in SPP8 data collection process for 2008-09

Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010


State performance plan annual performance report9

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

COMPLIANCE INDICATORS


State performance plan annual performance report10

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

  • Change in methodology for identifying overand under representation

  • Required review of policies, procedures and practices (self assessment)

  • Implement new race/ethn. reporting req. by 2010-11

Indicator 9: % of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

No change in PEIMS data collection

Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010


State performance plan annual performance report11

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

  • Change in methodology for identifying overand under representation

  • Required review of policies, procedures and practices (self assessment)

  • Implement new race/ethn. reporting req. by 2010-11

Indicator 10: % of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.

No change in PEIMS data collection

Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010


State performance plan annual performance report12

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

  • Indicator change

  • Potential changes to the data collection procedures for 2009-10

  • Noncompliance correction ASAPBNLTOY

Indicator 11: % of children who were evaluated within 60 days of receiving parental consent for initial evaluation or, if the State establishes a timeframe within which the evaluation must be conducted, within that timeline.

No change in SPP11 data collection for 2008-09

Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010


State performance plan annual performance report13

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

  • Noncompliance correction ASAPBNLTOY

Indicator 12: % of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

No change in SPP12 data collection for 2008-09

Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010


State performance plan annual performance report14

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

Indicator 13: % of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.

OLD INDICATOR


State performance plan annual performance report15

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

NEW INDICATOR


State performance plan annual performance report16

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

Indicator 13: % of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are annually updated and based upon an age appropriate transition assessment, transition services, including courses of study, that will reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, and annual IEP goals related to student’s transition services needs. There also must be evidence that the student was invited to the IEP Team meeting where transition services are to be discussed and evidence that, if appropriate, a representative of any participating agency was invited to the IEP Team meeting with the prior consent of the parent or student who has reached the age of majority.


State performance plan annual performance report17

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

  • District will submit data, State will not report it

  • Noncompliance correction ASAPBNLTOY!

Indicator 13: % of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.

No change in SPP13 data collection for 2008-09No APR Reporting in 2010

Report in FFY 2009 APR due Feb 1, 2011


State performance plan annual performance report18

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

  • Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.

  • Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.

  • Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

Indicator 14: % of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:

No change in SPP14 data collection process for 2008-09No APR Reporting in 2010

Report in FFY 2009 SPP due Feb 1, 2011


Disproportionate representation

Disproportionate Representation


Special education state performance plan annual performance report

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

Indicator 9: % of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

Indicator 10: % of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.


Special education state performance plan annual performance report

State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report

  • Indicators 9 and 10 are Compliance Indicators

  • Analysis identifies over and under representation for the reporting year

  • No Comparisons of Race/Ethnicity Categories/ Use of Minimum “N” Size

  • Required review of policies, procedures and practices (self assessment)

  • Implement new race/ethn. reporting req. by 2010-11

Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010


Lea determination levels

LEA Determination Levels


Lea determinations 2009 determination criteria

LEA Determinations/ 2009 Determination Criteria

1. State Performance Plan (SPP) Compliance (SPP 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13)

2. Valid, Reliable, and Timely Data

3. Status of Uncorrected Noncompliance

4. Financial Audits

5. Program Effectiveness (PBMAS Results)

http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/special.ed/spp/09determin.pdf


Determination level ratings

Determination Level Ratings


For more information please contact

For more information, please contact:

Sherry Marsh

Education Service Center, Region 20

[email protected]

210-370-5411


  • Login