Tasbo legislative update
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 19

TASBO Legislative Update PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 93 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

TASBO Legislative Update. Presented by Moak, Casey & Associates. Agenda. Litigation Update State Budget Update MCA Survey on Staffing School Finance Data Where from Here. Litigation Update. Litigant Groups. The Texas Taxpayer and Student Fairness Coalition Thompson Plaintiffs MALDEF

Download Presentation

TASBO Legislative Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Tasbo legislative update

TASBO Legislative Update

Presented by

Moak, Casey & Associates


Agenda

Agenda

  • Litigation Update

  • State Budget Update

  • MCA Survey on Staffing

  • School Finance Data

  • Where from Here


Litigation update

Litigation Update


Litigant groups

Litigant Groups

  • The Texas Taxpayer and Student Fairness Coalition

  • Thompson Plaintiffs

  • MALDEF

  • Chapter 41


Arguments

Arguments

  • Suitability / GDK

  • Equity

  • State Ad Valorem Tax

  • Rationality


Suitability gdk

Suitability / GDK

  • How good does our education system have to be to meet the general diffusion of knowledge standard of the Texas constitution?

  • Is the cost of adequacy under the current system a suitable subject for judicial determination?

  • How do the evolving state standards work into the equation?

  • Do the outdated cost measures impair the adequacy of the system?

  • Equity component to adequacy claim.


Equity

Equity

  • Is the degradation of system equity since 2004 severe enough to warrant court intervention?

  • What weight does the state commitment to eliminate target revenue by 2017 have?

  • Should the yield for debt service be included in the court’s analysis of tax equity?

  • Given the standard of equity up to the GDK level, should the lack of recapture for a portion of “enrichment” be considered?


State ad valorem tax

State Ad Valorem Tax

  • Do the revenue reductions of the 2011 Legislature offset the “meaningful discretion” afforded by $1.17?

  • Do districts at $1.17 have meaningful discretion to enrich?

  • Should the effective combination of limited voter appeal and the potential for recapture be considered in the analysis?

  • Presented from multiple wealth perspectives


Rationality

Rationality

  • Does a separate but unequal funding scheme constitute “suitable” and “efficient” provision?

  • Does the use of 1980s’ weights and adjustments provide the state with a rational basis for funding public education?

  • Are the state long term commitments to adjust standards and financing sufficient?


Other litigation observations

Other Litigation Observations

  • Constitutional challenges as an element in a larger debate

  • Proclivity of the court to grant state discretion in all but clear “out of bounds” situations

  • Need for a clear constitutional priority for public education funding

  • Anticipate district court trial late summer / early fall

  • Beware of the request


State budget update

State Budget Update


State budget outlook

State Budget Outlook

  • Some good news

    • $6.5 billion left in state Rainy Day Fund based on revenue projections and state adopted budget

    • State likely closes last biennium with $1.7 billion surplus

    • Sales tax collections continue to grow

Moak, Casey & Associates


State budget outlook1

State Budget Outlook

  • Concerns

    • 82nd session one-time funding measures won’t be available for second use:

      • FSP payment delay: $2.0 to $2.3 billion

      • Speed-up of tax collections $700 million

    • Unfunded Medicaid commitment: $4.8 billion

    • Sales tax collections just approaching 2008 levels

    • Continued need for funding for student enrollment growth, population growth

Moak, Casey & Associates


Mca survey on staffing

MCA Survey on Staffing


Mca survey on staffing1

MCA Survey on Staffing

  • Included 60 districts, 39 percent of students

  • Respondent enrollment growth 17,593 students

  • Employing 9,586 fewer total staff (3,219 fewer teachers)

  • 11,833 more staff needed to maintain prior year staffing ratios

  • Extrapolated statewide, 32,000 more staff needed to maintain old staffing rations (12,000 teachers)

  • Most expect cuts to continue next year


School finance data

School Finance Data


Growth in revenue 2005 2009

Growth in Revenue 2005-2009

Moak, Casey & Associates


Tasbo legislative update

Moak, Casey & Associates


Tasbo legislative update

Lynn M. Moak

Daniel T. Casey

Partners

Amanda Brownson, Ph. D.

Chris Grammer

Bob Popinski

Larry Throm

Maria Whitsett, Ph. D.

Joe Wisnoski

Kathy Mathias

Larry Groppel, Ed. D.

Thomas V. Alvis, Ph. D.

Consultants

Susan Moak

Kari Ruehman

Administrative Staff

400 West 15th Street, Suite 1410, Austin, Texas 78701-1648

Ph. (512) 485-7878 Fax (512) 485-7888

www.moakcasey.com

Moak, Casey & Associates


  • Login