1 / 12

Relational Autonomy

Relational Autonomy. Bioethics: Autonomy and Health (Spring 2014) Laura Guidry-Grimes. Some Test Cases….

tao
Download Presentation

Relational Autonomy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Relational Autonomy Bioethics: Autonomy and Health (Spring 2014) Laura Guidry-Grimes

  2. Some Test Cases… • Jane, 18, grew up surrounded by images of slender and busty women. Her dolls, magazines, and television shows all push unattainable beauty ideals. She believes that no one will appreciate or value a woman who does not have this body type. She now feels horrible about her body and can hardly stand to look in the mirror. She thinks she can start respecting herself if she gets plastic surgery. • Can Jane autonomously choose breast augmentation surgery?

  3. Some Test Cases… • Jake, 19, has a 16 year-old brother with end-stage renal disease. The brother desperately needs a kidney, but his suicide attempt last year has prevented him from being elevated on the kidney transplant list. Jake’s parents are immensely distraught, and they fully expect Jake—the only match in the family—to give his kidney to his brother. Jake worries that he will lose his football scholarship if he gives the kidney, but he also worries his family will abandon him if he refuses. • Can Jake autonomously choose to donate a kidney to his brother?

  4. Relational Autonomy as a Concept • “conviction that persons are socially embedded and that agents’ identities are formed within the context of social relationships and shaped by a complex of intersecting social determinants, such as race, class, gender, and ethnicity” (4) • Rejection of • Definining ‘autonomy’ in a way that excludes groups of people (such as women and minorities) • Unrealistic, unjustified, and over-idealized notions of what capacities are needed to reason, plan, and make authentic and free decisions

  5. Traditional Accounts of Autonomy:Problematic Claims • Humans are capable of being self-sufficient, isolatable, and independent beings. • We are atomistic and radically separate from other persons • in development, self-understanding, or constitution. • It is undesirable to be a person who is dependent on others and who lacks complete self-control. • Every person is capable of successful self-mastery, since all of our beliefs, desires, and emotions are clear and transparent to us. • Our identities as individuals are clear and unified, and our relationships and associations with larger groups do not affect our identities in any deep way.

  6. These claims can be problematic even if you are not a feminist!

  7. What are we REALLY like as agents? • Communities and relationships help us develop, maintain, and further our autonomous capacities. • No one is completely independent; we are deeply dependent and interpersonal creatures. • Our sense of self and (perhaps) our identity are necessarily constituted (to a large extent) by how we interact with others and how we perceive ourselves in relation to others. • Reason is not an isolated capacity that is immune to how we are socially situated, and it is not threatened by emotions or affiliative bonds.

  8. Moving Forward: Conceptions of Autonomy

  9. Procedural vs. Substantive Accounts • Procedural • “What matters for autonomy is whether the agent has subjected her motivations and actions to the appropriate kind of critical reflection” (13-14) • Does the person have the capacities and skills to reflect critically? • Substantive • Critical reflection, no matter how thorough or sophisticated, is not sufficient to grant autonomy • The content of emotions, desires, maxims, and values matters for assessing autonomous decision-making.

  10. “think of autonomy as a characteristic of agents who are emotional, embodied, desiring, creative, and feeling, as well as rational creatures” (21)

  11. Discussion Questions • Relational autonomy accounts stand in opposition to traditional Kantian accounts that rely on Reason alone for agency. Do you find the relational critiques compelling? • Do procedural or substantive conceptions pinpoint what’s really important for assessing autonomous decision-making? • How should we understand autonomy in oppressive contexts, where someone has been indoctrinated with oppressive norms? • Do you think someone can be oppressed, coerced, or exploited but nonetheless retain their autonomy in some way?

  12. Questions? Comments?

More Related