Putting a national portal for undergraduate theses into production
Download
1 / 14

Putting a National Portal for Undergraduate Theses into Production - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 69 Views
  • Uploaded on

Putting a National Portal for Undergraduate Theses into Production. LIBRIS Uppsök Peter Linde, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden. BIBSAM SVEP. Royal Library’s Department for National Co-ordination and Development. Coordination of Electronic

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Putting a National Portal for Undergraduate Theses into Production' - tanya-jimenez


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Putting a national portal for undergraduate theses into production
Putting a National Portal for Undergraduate Theses into Production

LIBRIS Uppsök

Peter Linde, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden

Kaliningrad 2005


Bibsam svep

BIBSAM SVEP Production

Royal Library’s Department

for National Co-ordination

and Development

Coordination of Electronic

Publishing efforts in

Swedish Universities

Kaliningrad 2005


SVEP Production

  • Interoperability- harmonisation of descriptions and formats

  • Preservation – solutions for archiving

  • Advice and dissemination

  • Workshops

  • Building a National Portal

Kaliningrad 2005


Why undergraduate theses
Why Undergraduate theses? Production

  • Not easily accessible.

  • Much in demand

  • Useful for public information

  • Valuable source where research density is low

  • Make students appreciate the benefits of OA

  • Increased visibility improves marketing courses

  • Releases library resources

Kaliningrad 2005


Reviewing metadata
Reviewing metadata Production

  • Dublin Core

  • Mandatory

    • Title

    • Identifier

    • Publisher

    • Type

    • Date

    • Language

    • Creator

  • Not Mandatory

    • Description = Abstracts

    • Subject = Keywords

Kaliningrad 2005


The metadata model thesis type
The Metadata Model – Thesis Type Production

http://www.svep-projekt.se/masters-theses/Metadata_model/

Kaliningrad 2005


The metadata model subject category
The Metadata Model – ProductionSubject Category

Kaliningrad 2005


Advice dissemination
Advice & Dissemination Production

  • Putting together an overview of institutional repository software

    • Initiating a workshop series

    • Setting up a web site with information and presentations

  • Giving help and support by experts to local institutions

Kaliningrad 2005


Looking for somebody
Looking for Somebody Production

LIBRIS Department

Responsible for the maintenance and systems development

at the Royal Library in Stockholm

LIBRIS

LIBRIS

Kaliningrad 2005


Uppsök Production Interface

Kaliningrad 2005


The user study
The user study Production

  • How hard/easy is it to navigate the interface?

  • Is the field “Type of thesis” useful?

  • Is the list of university departments useful or confusing?

  • Have we found the right combination of fields and choices for the interface?

  • Does the resource contain attractive information?

Kaliningrad 2005


User study results
User Study Results Production

  • User instruction must be more highlighted

  • Confusing messages

  • The Keyword field can go!

  • The field ”Type of Thesis” is of use for the students

Kaliningrad 2005


Usage statistics
Usage/Statistics Production

15 participating Universities

Ca. 12.000 records

Average: 1004 Searches/Day

Luleå

Umeå

Dalarna

Uppsala

SLU

Stockholm

Södertörn

Örebro

Linköping

Jönköping

Göteborg

Växjö

BTH

Kristianstad

Lund

Kaliningrad 2005


Conclusions
Conclusions Production

Several factors helped to make the project a success:

  • the simplicity of the metadata model

  • the project partners were a heterogenous group with great experience in practical work

  • the tools, software and standards were all there

  • the workshop series supplied new providers and ideas

  • LIBRIS long term commitment.

Kaliningrad 2005


ad