The “Impact Pathway Approach” – so called, “ExternE Methodology”
Download
1 / 33

Aim of Methodology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 246 Views
  • Uploaded on

The “Impact Pathway Approach” – so called, “ExternE Methodology” to Estimate Impacts and External Costs. Application in North Africa Methodology, Limits, Exemplary Results Philipp PREISS IER, Universität Stuttgart. Presentation Outline. Aim of Methodology

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Aim of Methodology ' - tannar


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

The “Impact Pathway Approach” – so called, “ExternE Methodology” to Estimate Impacts and External Costs.Application in North Africa

Methodology, Limits, Exemplary Results

Philipp PREISS

IER, Universität Stuttgart


Presentation Methodology” Outline

  • Aim of Methodology

  • Basic principles - Impact Pathway Approach – Part 1: Quantification of Impacts

  • Impacts Included

  • Basic principles - Impact Pathway Approach – Part 2: Quantification of Costs

  • Assessment of Climate Change

  • Example Results – Uncertainty – Range of Results

  • Applications of the Results

  • Summary


Aim of the ExternE methodology: Methodology”

 helps to take into account all externalities in a consistent way when making decisions

  • Investment decisions

  • Technology Assessment (subsidies, research support)

  • Consumer decisions (e.g. by adjusting prices, by internalisation of external costs)

  • Cost-benefit analyses, esp. for environmental and health regulation

  • Green accounting


Basic principles Methodology”

  • Pressures, (e.g. emissions of substances to environmental media) have to be estimated

  • 2) Assessment of effects/impacts (e.g. health risk), of the pressures (e.g. emissions of pollutants)

  •  relation between pressure and impact is in general not linear and

  •  impacts depend on time and site of pressure

  •  “Bottom-up approach” needed for the complex pathways: the ‘Impact Pathway Approach’ (IPA)


Physical Impacts Methodology”

Pollutant / Noise

Emission

Transport and

Chemical

Transformation

Impact Pathway Approach – Part 1

Differences ofPhysical Impacts

Calculation is made twice: with and without project!


Background Methodology” Concentration of Prim. PM2.5 [µg/m3]

Additional Emission of 1000 t PPM2.5 in Egypt


Delta Methodology” Conc. of PPM2.5 [µg/m3]


Population Distribution Methodology”


Population*Delta Conc. Methodology”  Accumulated Exposure


Quantification of Impacts and Costs Methodology”

relation between pressure and impact

Concentration Response Function (CRF):

Example: Additional Years of Life Lost = 6.5 · 10-5· Dconc. PPM2.5 ·Population

Number of Years of Life Lost [YOLL] due to 1000 ton emission of fine dust PPM2.5 in Egypt

in Egypt = 748

in the Northern Hemisphere = 53

in Western Europe < 0.5


YOLL Methodology”  Years of Life Lost due to 1000 t PPM2.5


Impacts Included (I) Methodology”

: PM2.5, PMco


Impacts Included (II) Methodology”


Differences of Physical Methodology”

Impacts

Pollutant/Noise

Emission

Transport and

Chemical

Transformation

Impact Pathway Approach – Part 1

Calculation is made twice: with and without project!


Basic Approach of NEEDS/ExternE Methodology”

Assessment of impacts is based on the (measured) preferences of the affected and well-informed population


Basic principles - Impact Pathway Approach – Methodology” Part 2: Quantification of Costs

Preferences are expressed, and

effects are transformed into monetary units:

- allows transfer of values, - units are conceivable, - direct use of results in CBA and for internalising via taxes possible.

(…however, e.g. ‘utility points’ would give the same ranking).


Differences of Physical Methodology”

Impacts

Pollutant/Noise

Emission

Transport and

Chemical

Transformation

MonetaryValuation

Impact Pathway Approach – Part 2

Calculation is made twice: with and without project!


Monetary Valuation Methodology”


Quantification of Costs Methodology”

Concentration Response Function: Additional Years of Life Lost = 6.5 · 10-5· Dconc. PPM2.5 · Population

Quantified number of additional Years of Life Lost due to one year operation : 748 YOLL

Monetary value: 40000 Euro2005per Year of Life Lost

Damage costs per year:748 YOLL * 40000 Euro per YOLL = 29.2 Million Euro2005


Valuation methods for non market goods
Valuation methods for non-market goods Methodology”

Revealed Preference

behaviour (shown in the past)

Stated Preference

surveys

  • Indirect valuation

  • assesses costs or efforts that can be linked to the non-market good

  • Hedonic Price Method

  • Averting Behavior Method

  • Travel Cost Method

  • Contingent Behavior Method

  • Past behaviour of public decision makers

  • Direct valuation

  • Contingent Valuation

  • Method (CVM)

  • Attribute Based Choice

  • Modeling (ABCM)

  • Participatory approaches

  • Surveys for preferences of public decision makers


Assessment of Climate Change Methodology”

I. Marginal Damage Costs

  • Includes the following categories:

  • agriculture

  • forestry

  • sea level rise

  • cardiovascular and respiratory disorders related to cold and heat stress

  • malaria

  • dengue fever

  • schistosomiasis

  • diarrhoea

  • energy consumption

  • water resources and

  • unmanaged ecosystems

  • Time horizon till 2300


Assessment of Climate Change Methodology”

I. Marginal Damage Costs

"Average, 1% trimmed“, "1% PRTP“ , “World Average Equity Weighting”


Assessment of Climate Change Methodology”

II. Marginal Avoidance Costs

"500 ppm CO2 “, “technological progress“ , “certificates-emission dealing”


Some exemplary results of applying the ExternE tools Methodology” EcoSenseWebThe results of the ExternE research are the functions and tools that can be applied to answer individual questions!Results of applying the tools depend on scenario, site, time and technology!


  • Possibly important effects Methodology” that are not (yet) included:

  • Visual intrusion

  • Biodiversity loss (local, however included in Environmental Impact Study)

  • Risk of nuclear proliferation and terrorism

  • Risk aversion resp. treatment of Damocles risks


Quantified external costs euro cent kwh of a coal fired power station steam turbine
Quantified External Costs [Euro-Cent / kWh] of a Methodology” Coal Fired Power Station (steam turbine)


External costs of different technologies euro cent kwh 19 euro t co2 yoll chronic 40000 euro
External Costs of Different Technologies [Euro-Cent / kWh] Methodology” 19 Euro/t CO2, YOLLchronic = 40000 Euro

Sites in Germany;

2010 technologies!


6 Methodology”

5

4

External Costs [Euro-Cent / kWh]

3

2

1

0

WEC

Hydro

PWR,

PV sc-Si

Natural

ORC-

PAFC

Lignite,

Coal,

Coal PFB

Offshore

reproc

gas-CC

HKW

IGCC

IGCC

Health impacts

Crops

Material

Climate change


External costs of power stations euro cent kwh assuming 50 euro t co2
External Costs of Power Stations [Euro-Cent / kWh] Methodology” Assuming 50 Euro/t CO2


Quantification of Externalities of Heat Supply Methodology” CB=condensing boiler, MFH=multi family house, OFM=one family house


External costs euro ton of emission results europe results north africa
External Costs [Euro / ton] of Emission Methodology”  ResultsEurope  ResultsNorth Africa


Applications of the IPA/ExternE Results Methodology”

European Union:

Energy: justification for promoting and subsidizing renewable energy; recommended cap on subsidies for renewables

Transport: cost-benefit analysis mandatory for all major infrastructure projects; planned to levy tolls according to infrastructure and external costs

Environmental Protection: Cost-benefit analysis for all recently implemented directives for Air Pollution Control:

e.g. Non-Hazardeous Waste Incineration Directive, Large Combustion Plant Directive, National Emissions Ceilings Directive, Daughter Directives to Air Quality Directive: ozone, CO and benzene

UN: cost-benefit analysis for the UN/ECE multi-pollutant multi-effect protocol


Summary Methodology”

  • The ExternE methodology estimates effects of technologies for energy conversion and assesses them based on preferences of the effected population for a large number of impact pathways.

  • The methodology is already widely used for decision aid in the fields of energy conversion, transport and environmental protection.

  • Gaps and uncertainties exist, however will be more and more reduced due to ongoing research (e.g. on dispersion models for Africa, pathways involving toxic substances, heavy metals, biodiversity, water and soil contamination…)

  • More information ExternE: www.ExternE.info

  • Tool EcoSenseWeb: www.EcoSenseWeb.ier.uni-stuttgart.de


ad