1 / 16

Electrophysiology of Visual Attention

Electrophysiology of Visual Attention. Does Visual Attention Modulate Visual Evoked Potentials?. The theory is that Visual Attention modulates visual information at the level of visual cortex How would you design an experiment to test this theory?.

tanek
Download Presentation

Electrophysiology of Visual Attention

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electrophysiology of Visual Attention

  2. Does Visual Attention Modulate Visual Evoked Potentials? • The theory is that Visual Attention modulates visual information at the level of visual cortex • How would you design an experiment to test this theory?

  3. Does Visual Attention Modulate Visual Evoked Potentials? • Sustained visual selective attention based on location (attend left or attend right) • Eyes remain fixed at centre (covert attention) • Detect onset of a specific target • Record the visual ERP in response to stimuli

  4. Does Visual Attention Modulate Visual Evoked Potentials? • Result: several components of the visual ERP are modulated by attention • P1 and N1 are larger for attended relative to unattended stimuli

  5. Does Visual Attention Modulate Visual Evoked Potentials? • P1 effect is the difference between P1 peaks on attended and unattended trials • Has contralateral topography (isopotential voltage maps and scalp current density maps) • consistent with sources in extrastriate cortex

  6. Does Visual Attention Modulate Visual Evoked Potentials? • Timing of P1 effect (70 to 90) ms suggests that sustained attention affects the feed-forward sweep but not at primary cortex • Can we conclude that V1 is unaffected by sustained attention? • P1 effect can be caused only by attending to locations • Selection by colour, orientation, conjunctions or identity does not modulate early visual processes

  7. Does Visual Attention Modulate Visual Evoked Potentials? • Transient visual spatial attention also enhances perceptual abilities for attended relative to unattended stimuli • The theory is that transient visual attention causes a P1 and N1 effect like sustained visual attention • How could you test that?

  8. Does Visual Attention Modulate Visual Evoked Potentials? • Cue – Target Paradigm: Responses are faster and more accurate for validly cued stimuli Notice that the target stimulus is identical across the attention conditions

  9. Does Visual Attention Modulate Visual Evoked Potentials? • Both P1 and N1 effects are observed • Effects are most pronounced over contralateral cortex • Note this is different from the auditory transient attention case

  10. Consequences of Attentional Selection Single unit recordings

  11. Consequences of Attentional Selection • Selection of one location or object or auditory stream has consequences for sensory responses evoked by that stimulus • ERP responses in auditory and visual cortex • Are there effects of attentional selection observable at the cellular level? • This is going to require intracranial recordings • What animal would you choose?

  12. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • Moran and Desimone (1985) • Approach this as a “Vision Scientist” - Recall that: • Cells in ventral stream pathway are selective for color, orientation, complex shapes • “classical” notion of RF is that a cell should fire actively whenever its preferred stimulus is present in its RF • V4 RFs are a few degrees of visual angle – much larger than the resolution of attention • What happens when attention selects an object in a cell’s RF if that cell isn’t “tuned” to the features of the object?

  13. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • Moran and Desimone (1985) • Response properties of cells are identified a priori • Each cell is characterized by what is an “effective” and “ineffective” stimulus • Monkeys were trained to attend to one of several locations within a V4 RF • Monkey is given a target in a delayed match-to-sample task • Respond when target stimulus occurs at cued location

  14. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • Moran and Desimone (1985) • “Classical” RF prediction: there should be no difference in responses in these two conditions

  15. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • Moran and Desimone (1985) • Result: Response to “Sample” Response to “Sample” Response to Target Response to Target “effective” stimulus at unattended location “effective” stimulus at attended location

  16. Intracranial Recordings of Attentional Selection • Moran and Desimone (1985) • Result: • Neuron responds vigorously only if its effective stimulus is attended • Interesting caveat: this only applies when there is an ineffective stimulus (to which the monkey attends) present in the V4 RF • When the ineffective stimulus is outside of the cell’s RF, it’s responses are largely unmodulated

More Related