1 / 19

Social Indicators and Indicator Systems: Tools for Social Monitoring and Reporting Heinz-Herbert Noll ZUMA – Social Ind

Social Indicators and Indicator Systems: Tools for Social Monitoring and Reporting Heinz-Herbert Noll ZUMA – Social Indicators Department Mannheim, Germany www.gesis.org/sozialindikatoren/. Two Basic Functions of Social Indicators:

tandice
Download Presentation

Social Indicators and Indicator Systems: Tools for Social Monitoring and Reporting Heinz-Herbert Noll ZUMA – Social Ind

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Social Indicators and Indicator Systems: Tools for Social Monitoring and Reporting Heinz-Herbert Noll ZUMA – Social Indicators Department Mannheim, Germany www.gesis.org/sozialindikatoren/

  2. Two Basic Functions of Social Indicators: Measurement and Monitoring of Wellbeing and Social Progress (comparative) monitoring of changes in living conditions and the quality of life: - is the quality of individual life and societies getting better or worse across time? - how is life in one society, region, city compared to other societies, regions ...  Monitoring of General Social Change (comparative) monitoring of structural changes and progress in modernization - how do social structures change across time - what are the structural differences between societies, regions etc.

  3. Social Reporting  major application of social indicators (research)  monitoring + analysis + interpretation  based on aggregated data & microdata analysis  specific advantages and disadvantages of official and non-official approaches  plurality of approaches and activities needed, including science based social reporting

  4. Social Indicators and Social Reporting: Knowledge for Whom and What? to inform and enlighten citizens and the general public part of ‘democratic infrastructure’  to provide expert knowledge for political elites, admini- strations and governments  to provide information for research and education  overall: creation and supply of knowledge for the continuous selfreflection of societies

  5. Basic Requirements of Constructing a System of Social Indicators Key Questions: how to choose a limited number of subjects / dimensions of measurement from an unlimited social universe?how to organize the measurement and monitoring processes? Key Elements of an Indicator System:framework or rationale needed to identify and justify the selection of dimensions of measurement to be addressed  system architecture needed to set up the basic structure and to define pro- cedures of measurement Formal Criteria to be respected by constructing a system of (social) indicators:  comprehensiveness consistency non-redundancy parsimoniousness

  6. German System of Social Indicators • - created in the 1970‘s • - 14 life domains • - ca. 400 indicators • ca. 3000 time series • - from 1950 onwards as far as data available • Digital Information System Disi 2.1 (bilingual) • free download • selection of 83 ‚key- • indicators‘ (www)

  7. European System of Social Indicators • Overall Objective: • to develop a theoretically as well as methodologically well-grounded set of social indicators to be used to monitor quality of individual life and societies as well as changes in the social structure at the European level • General Properties and Requirements: •  science based, theory and concept driven approach •  comprehensive and integrated system •  use of most appropriate - valid and reliable - indicators •  use of best available databases and ensuring cross-national comparability • Final Product: •  EUSI - Electronic European Information System Social Indicators

  8. Data, Policy and Concept Driven Approaches of Indicator Construction Data Driven Data  Indicators  Classification of Indicators e.g. Eurostat‘s „list of social Indicators“  Policy Driven Policy concerns  policy objectives Indicators  Data e.g. „Common Indicators Relating to National Strategies for Safe and Sustainable Pensions“ by Indicators Subgroup of the EU –Social Protection Committee Concept Driven Concept  Measurement Dimensions  Indicators  Data e.g. European System of Social Indicators (EUSI)

  9. Life Domains • Population, Households and Families • Transportation • Leisure, Media and Culture • Social and Political Participation and Integration • Income, Standard of Living, and Consumption Patterns • Education and Vocational Training • Health • Housing • Labour Market and Working Conditions • Social Security • Public Safety and Crime • Environment • Total Life Situation Dimensions of Welfare • Quality of Life • Objective Living Conditions • Subjective Well-Being • Social Cohesion • Disparities, Inequalities, Social Exclusion • Social Ties/Social Capital • Sustainability • Human Capital • Natural Capital Dimensions of Social Change • Sociodemographic and -economic Structure • Values and Attitudes Life Domains & Measurement Dimensions Domain-specific Mea- surement Dimensions e.g. Child Care Services Income Inequality Trust in Educational System Health Prevention Environmental Impacts of Housing Occupational structure Attitudes towards Environmental Protection

  10. Some Additional Elements of System’s Architecture  Indicators: objective (outcomes, resources, conditions, inputs) and subjective (outcomes)  Coverage EU15 - Member States + Norway, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Japan, United States new EU member states are being included successively  Periodicity of Observation Starting point of time-series: 1980; year by year observations as far as data are available Level of Regional Disaggregation: NUTS-1 or similar level as far as meaningful and data are available  Data Sources: Aggregated Data: for example EUROSTAT – Data- bases; Microdata: for example ECHP, LIS, Eurobarometer, ISSP, World-Value-Surveys, European Social Survey

  11. Coverage of Child Care Services for Children Aged less than 3 Years In % of Best Practice (DK) 100 90 80 70 60 % (Best Practice= 100) 50 40 30 20 10 100 76 74 63 49 43 43 25 16 14 11 8 5 4 0 DK D-E S N UK FIN F JAP H I (2000) D A PL D-W (2000) (1998) (1998) (2000) (2000) (1999) (1999) (2000) (2000) (1998) (1999) (2000) (1998) Country

  12. Dimension: Disparities, Inequalities and Social ExclusionLife Domain: Labour Market and Working Conditions Indicator: Ratio of Unemployment Rates of Women and Men

  13. Dimension: Demographic and Socio-economic StructuresLife Domain: Labour Market and Working ConditionsIndicator: Employment in the Service Sector (in %)

  14. Dimension: Subjective Well-beingLife Domain: Income, Standard of Living and Consumption PatternsIndicator: Possibility to live comfortable on present income (in %) Database: European Social Survey 2002 / 2003

  15. Two Major Forms of Giving Access to the Data:  Website: www.gesis.org/en/social_monitoring/social_indicators/EU_Reporting/eusi.htm

  16.  Electronic European Information System Social Indicators (Prototype) Planned: Web-based Electronic Information System

  17. Potential Uses and Applications:  Tool for Comparative Research - descriptive background information for various kinds of analysis - database for the comparative charting and analysis of social change - database to be used to test macro-sociological hypotheses  Tool for General Social Monitoring and Reporting - comparative information on current state and changes of individual living conditions, wellbeing and societal quality  Tool for Policy Making - information on goal achievement - information on convergence and divergence - information on best practice: benchmarking - identification of deficiencies and need for action

  18. Total Fertility Rate by Supply of Child Care Services 1,9 F N 1,8 FIN 1,7 UK DK 1,6 1,5 D-W S TFR 1,4 PL D JAP 1,3 A H 2 R = 0,5393 1,2 I 1,1 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Child Care Services

More Related