1 / 33

Digestates : Characteristics, Processing and Utilisation

PHOTO OF RELEVANCE FOR TALK. Digestates : Characteristics, Processing and Utilisation. Dr Julie Williams & Dr Sandra Esteves. Inaugural Bio-Methane Regions Event Training the Trainers 26-27 th May 2011 - University of Glamorgan, South Wales. Contents. Characteristics of digestates

tanaya
Download Presentation

Digestates : Characteristics, Processing and Utilisation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PHOTO OF RELEVANCE FOR TALK Digestates: Characteristics, Processing and Utilisation Dr Julie Williams & Dr Sandra Esteves Inaugural Bio-Methane Regions Event Training the Trainers 26-27th May 2011 - University of Glamorgan, South Wales

  2. Contents • Characteristics of digestates • Nutrient content (NPK) • Digestate as a soil conditioner/fertiliser • Other potential markets • Impacts when applied to land • Stability of digestates • Digestate Processing

  3. Anaerobic Digestion Hydrolysis Acidogenesis Acetigenesis Methanogenesis In solution: Short chained sugars Amino acids Fatty acids Acetic acid and alcohols Carbohydrates Proteins Fats Short chained acids, Alcohols CO2 and H2 CH4 , CO2 and H2O Homoacetigenesis Biogas CO2 and H2 Organics H2S Sulphate reduction Complex Substrate NH4, NH3 Protein Breakdown Products Lignin Lignin Digestate Water Water Inorganics Light and heavy metals (P, K, Na, Ca etc.) Light and heavy metals (P, K, Na, Ca etc.)

  4. Characteristics of Digestates • Can vary according to input material and operating conditions • Low dry matter (typically between 1-8 % solids) • High water content • Undigested material e.g. lignins and cell debris • Inorganic nutrients (ammonium-N and P) • May contain potentially toxic elements (PTEs) e.g. heavy metals • Whole digestate can be separated into fibre and liquid fractions • Classed as a waste or non-waste

  5. Nutrient content of digestates

  6. Fertiliser Manual (RB209) Defra June 2010 (http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/landmanage/land-soil/nutrient/documents/rb209-rev-100609.pdf)

  7. Fertiliser Manual (RB209) Defra June 2010 (http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/landmanage/land-soil/nutrient/documents/rb209-rev-100609.pdf)

  8. Potential Markets • Land applications e.g. Fertiliser • Soil conditioner • Converted to compost • Growing medium for plants • Land regeneration projects • Building materials (pressed into blocks) • Drying and pelletizing for use as a solid fuel or dried fertiliser AgroEnergien

  9. Impacts when applied to agricultural land • May affect the nutrient balance of soil • Risk of phytotoxicity • Nitrate leaching • Risk of methane and ammonia emissions • Odour • Risk to the public e.g. pathogens ,allergens and Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) • May affect microbial activity in soils • Transportation costs (carbon footprint)

  10. Stability of digestates Residual methane potential (% of methane yield) 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Hydraulic retention time (d) Losses of methane from digestate stores Weiland P (2009). Biogas- Messprogramm I 61 BiogasanlaganimVerlich. Erstelltdurch Johann Heinrich von Thunen-Institut (VTI), Gulzow, Germany

  11. NH3 Emissions 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ammonium proportion Ammonia proportion 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 pH Dissociation balance between ammonia/ammonium depending on pH and on temperature (calculated according to Kollbach et al., 1996) Fricke et al., 2007

  12. Odorous compounds in digestates • Hydrogen sulphide • Ammonia • Amines • Volatile organic acids • Propionic acid • Butyric acid • Reduced sulphur compounds

  13. Emissions and Odour Control Digestate storage tanks covered Sealed tankers for transporting liquor digestates No spreading of digestates, shallow injection will minimise emissions and odours

  14. Digestate processing

  15. Dewatering technologies for solid-liquid separation of manures/digestates • Sedimentation • Flotation • Screen separator • Belt press • Centrifuges • Screw press • Drying/evaporation technologies

  16. Dewatering technologies: Screw press

  17. Dewatering technologies: Decanter centrifuge

  18. Processes for further treatment of the solids: Composting and drying Solar drying of digestate Belt dryer Feed-and-turn dryer Fuchs & Drosg, 2010 Technologiebewertung von Garrestbehandlungs- und Verwertungskonzepten. Eigenverlag der Universitat fur Bodenkultur Wien

  19. Dewatering technologies: Evaporator unit Source: HRS

  20. Summary of parameters using different solid-liquid separation technologies Data collated from several studies

  21. Choice of methodology to employ for dewatering • Type of feedstock treated • Characteristics of the digestate • Financial considerations • Throughput • Energy requirements • Chemical addition requirement • Separation efficiency in terms of solid or mineral removal

  22. Effectiveness of the technologies for water removal Water is present in many different forms: • Free water • Bound water (intracellular water or within extracellular polymers) • Mechanical separators can remove the free water • Bound water may require drying (evaporation) or disruption of the cells

  23. Efficiency of solids separation Depends on the separator employed e.g. Separation efficiency of the screw press is low because it only retains particles > 1mm in diameter. Compare with decanter centrifuge retains all particles >0.02 mm Depends on the composition of the digestate TS and fibre content particle size distributions Treatment with flocculants

  24. Efficiency of solids separation Depends on the physical and chemical composition of the digestate TS and fibre content particle size distributions Stability of the particles (Zeta potential) Depends on the separator employed as well as by the settings e.g. Separation efficiency of the screw press is low because it only retains particles > 1mm in diameter. Compare with decanter centrifuge retains all particles > 0.02 mm. Treatment with flocculants

  25. Separation efficiencies (%) for DM, N, P and K of various manures and digestates using various technologies (Data collated from several studies) The proportion of a constituent partitioned to the solid fraction, relative to the amount in the slurry or digestate

  26. Processes for the treatment of the liquid phase Fuchs & Drosg, 2010 Technologiebewertung von Garrestbehandlungs- und Verwertungskonzepten. Eigenverlag der Universitat fur Bodenkultur Wien

  27. Nutrient flows during the digestate treatment process ULTRAFILTRATION 10 228 3 186 REVERSE OSMOSIS concentrate 10 228 3 186 Units in kg/t Source. Fuchs et al (2010) Digestate treatment: comparison and assessment of existing technologies. Third International Symposium on Energy from Biomass and Waste. Venice.

  28. Conclusions Consider the available options for the use of the digestate. Is their a sustainable market? Digestates contain valuable nutrients that make them a suitable alternative to chemical fertilizers. Separation technologies may be employed for partitioning of solids and nutrients (NPK) An important consideration when deciding on the choice of separator will be the intended application for the digestate

  29. Abbreviations • BCS Biofertiliser Certification Scheme • CFU Colony Forming Units • CHP Combined Heat & Power • DAF Dissolved Air Flotation • DM Dry Matter • NPK Nitrogen Phosphorous Potassium • PTE Potentially Toxic Elements • SL Separated Liquor • SF Separated Fibre

  30. PHOTO OF RELEVANCE FOR TALK Thank YouQuestions " The sole responsibility for the content of this document lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EACI nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein."

More Related