Hewlett packard compaq merger l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 29

Hewlett-Packard Compaq Merger PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 257 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Hewlett-Packard Compaq Merger. Business Decision Making Spring 2005. What We Hoped to Learn. Basic M&A criteria How the AHP process really works What happened with HP & Compaq and how can we make it better in the future?. Outline. Organizational Structure Introduction Criteria

Download Presentation

Hewlett-Packard Compaq Merger

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Hewlett packard compaq merger l.jpg

Hewlett-Packard Compaq Merger

Business Decision Making

Spring 2005


What we hoped to learn l.jpg

What We Hoped to Learn

  • Basic M&A criteria

  • How the AHP process really works

  • What happened with HP & Compaq and how can we make it better in the future?


Outline l.jpg

Outline

  • Organizational Structure

  • Introduction

  • Criteria

  • Alternatives

  • Hierarchy

  • Conclusion


Organizational structure l.jpg

Organizational Structure

COORDINATOR

Shannon Caputo

ALTERNATIVESCRITERIAEXPERTSWRITERS

Steve Piskadlo Phil LaspisaEvan Taylor Melissa Shah

Paul Ferraro Kathleen Cardelli -Presentations Jonathan Lai

Shawn Standen Chris Skorski Chris Skorski

Cassie Knox -Expert Choice

DOMAIN EXPERTS:

Dr. Stephen Andriole

Professor John Toppel


Outline5 l.jpg

Outline

  • Organizational Structure

  • Introduction

  • Criteria

  • Alternatives

  • Hierarchy

  • Conclusion


Introduction to hp l.jpg

Introduction to HP

  • Well-respected systems vendor

  • Smaller, but worthy competitor to IBM

  • Competes mainly in the hardware business with desktops and servers

  • Lacking in the services business

  • Undisputed leader with its line of PC printers


Introduction to compaq l.jpg

Introduction to Compaq

  • Compaq sales leveled off with added competition from Dell

  • Compaq was best known for its personal computer offerings

  • After paying $5.4 billion to finance a merger with Digital Equipment, Compaq eliminated overlap by cutting thousands of jobs worldwide


Slide8 l.jpg

Carly Fiorina: Mike Capellas:

C.E.O. of Hewlett-Packard C.E.O. of Compaq


Why merge l.jpg

Why Merge?

  • To compete with IBM and other companies

  • The combined services business will have 65,000 services professionals vs. 100,000-plus for IBM

  • Reduce Costs

  • Bolster stock


Merger dates l.jpg

Merger Dates

  • September 4, 2001 - HP and Compaq announced a definitive merger agreement to create an $87 billion global technology leader.

  • Eights months later on May 3, 2002 HP and Compaq officially merge.


What hp has to say on why l.jpg

What HP Has to Say on Why

  • Because in one strategic move, we will become market leaders in servers, in storage and in management software -- the essentials of business infrastructure, where leadership really counts.

  • Because we will greatly strengthen our depth and breadth of technology solutions at a time when customers demand integrated, end-to-end solutions.

  • Because more inventors and engineers will be focused on solving the toughest technology challenges of our times -- together.

  • Because combined we will lead the march toward open standards more effectively than either company could on its own.

  • Because for our employees, customers and shareowners, we will be a stronger, more vibrant HP, better conformed to lead and grow under market conditions that will demand unprecedented integration, breadth and flexibility.

  • Because in our industry, to stand still is to fall behind.


Outline12 l.jpg

Outline

  • Organizational Structure

  • Introduction

  • Criteria

  • Alternatives

  • Hierarchy

  • Conclusion


Main criteria l.jpg

Main Criteria

  • Ability to Improve Financial Performance

  • Ability to Evolve Company

  • Ability to Integrate


Financial implications l.jpg

Financial Implications


Ability to evolve company l.jpg

Ability to Evolve Company


Ability to integrate l.jpg

Ability to Integrate


Outline17 l.jpg

Outline

  • Organizational Structure

  • Introduction

  • Criteria

  • Alternatives

  • Hierarchy

  • Conclusion


Alternatives l.jpg

Alternatives

  • Should they Merge?YES

  • Should they Not Merge?NO


Outline19 l.jpg

Outline

  • Organizational Structure

  • Introduction

  • Criteria

  • Alternatives

  • Hierarchy

  • Conclusion


Expert choice l.jpg

Expert Choice


Outline21 l.jpg

Outline

  • Organizational Structure

  • Introduction

  • Criteria

  • Alternatives

  • Hierarchy

  • Analysis & Recommendations

  • Conclusion


Results l.jpg

Results

NO 53.4%

YES46.6%

Based on the M&A criteria recommended by our domain experts, HP and Compaq should not have merged


Sensitivity analysis l.jpg

Sensitivity Analysis

To change the final outcome…

  • Ability to Improve Financial Performance must increase from 46.6 to 55.7 or a 19.5% change

  • Ability to Evolve Company must decrease from 35.8 to 27.8 or a -22.3% change

  • Ability to Integrate does not affect the decision

    Overall, the final answer is not very sensitive to any of the criteria


Outline24 l.jpg

Outline

  • Organizational Structure

  • Introduction

  • Criteria

  • Alternatives

  • Hierarchy

  • Analysis & Recommendations

  • Conclusion


What happened l.jpg

What Happened?

  • They did manage to save $3 billion with the merger, successfully accomplishing their main goal of reducing costs of $2.1 billion

  • However, that came at the price of firing 44,000 employees over the last 3 years

    • Original estimate: 15,000-17,000


Conclusions l.jpg

Conclusions

Based on the criteria the HP and Compaq merger should not have gone through. Problems with integration as well as evolving the company can be forecasted through the AHP process we have shown here today.


Mark hurd hp s new c e o l.jpg

Mark Hurd: HP’s New C.E.O.

Mark Hurd, a former president at NCR corporation, where he spent 25 years; was appointed C.E.O. and president of Hewlett-Packard on March 29, 2005.


Thank you questions l.jpg

Thank You!Questions?


  • Login