1 / 44

COMPASS Status Report 2009/2010

COMPASS Status Report 2009/2010. Bernhard Ketzer Technische Universit ät München for the COMPASS Collaboration SPSC, CERN 29 June 2010. Outline. New results from 2004 p - pilot run New results from 2008 hadron run 3 p final states Multi-particle final states (>3)

tambre
Download Presentation

COMPASS Status Report 2009/2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. COMPASS Status Report2009/2010 Bernhard Ketzer TechnischeUniversität München forthe COMPASS Collaboration SPSC, CERN 29 June 2010

  2. Outline • New results from 2004 p- pilot run • New results from 2008 hadron run • 3p final states • Multi-particle final states (>3) • Kaonic final states • Data with proton beam • Hadron run 2009 • Performance of spectrometer • First analysis of data • New results from muon scattering • Helicity distributions • Collins and Sivers asymmetries • Update on DG from open charm • Preparation and status of 2010 muon run

  3. The COMPASS Experiment MuonWall SM2 E/HCAL E/HCAL MuonWall SM1 Target RICH Beam • Two-stage spectrometer • large angular acceptance • broad kinematical range • ~250000 channels • > 1000 TB/year 50 m • Data taking periods: • 2002-2004: 160 GeV/c m+ • 2004: 2 weeks 190 GeV/c p- • 2006-2007: 160 GeV/c m+ • 2008-2009: 190 GeV/c p- • 2010: 160 GeV/c m+ RPD [COMPASS, P. Abbon et al., NIM A 577, 455 (2007)]

  4. Hadron Reactions at COMPASS Three production mechanisms studied in parallel usingproton, pionandkaonprojectiles Central production Diffractive dissociation Photoproduction • Rapidity gap between pslow, hfast, X • Beam particle looses ~10% of its energy • Particles at large angles from X decays • Possible source of glueballs (DPE) • Forward kinematics • Need to separate particles at • very small angles • Study of JPC-exotic mesons

  5. Analysis of 2004 Data Beam: 190 GeV/c p-, 5·106pps Target: 3 mm Pb Trigger: Multiplicity • Analysis: • p-p-p+ final state • High-t’: observation of spin-exotic resonance with JPC=1-+ • Low-t’: new results on photoproduction / diffraction • p-p-p-p+p+final state • acceptance corrections done • optimization of wave set ongoing

  6. JPC=1-+ Exotic Wave in p-p-p+

  7. p-p-p+ Final State at low t’ • Coherent production on Pb nucleus • Contributions at very low t’: • Diffraction: • Photoprod.: • Fit of 2 exponentialsfor t’ < 0.006 GeV2/c2 • Steep fall-off for photoproduced events dominated by experimental resolution • Statistical subtraction of diffractive contribution

  8. Partial Wave Analysis Two clearly separated regions: t’ < 0.5·10-3GeV2/c2 0.0015 < t’ < 0.01 GeV2/c2 a2(1320) (M=1) present in both t’-ranges  different production mechanisms? Diffraction vanishes for t’→0 Photoproduction Phase difference a2(1320) - a1(1260): offset for two t’-regions!

  9. Phase Difference a2-a1 PWA in t’ bins for single mass bin 1.26 < m3p < 1.38 GeV/c2 (a2 region) Theory [G. Faeldt et al., Phys. Rev. C 79 014607 (2009)] Plot by N. Kaiser, TUM Experiment F(a2) F(a1) DF(a2-a1) • smooth transitionbetween a2photoproduction • todiffractiveproductionwithincreasing t‘ • possibilitytocleanlyseparate photoproductionfromdiffraction  determinationofradiativewidthof a2(1320), p2(1670)

  10. Analysis of 2008 Data Beam: 190 GeV/c p-, 2.5·107pps, protons Target: 40 cm liquid hydrogen Trigger: Recoil proton (DT0) • Analysis: • p-p-p+ final state • full 2008 statistics available • M=1 production suppressed • acceptance corrections being finalized (MC description) • final states containing neutral particles • ECAL optimization close to being finished • p-p0p0 final state:isospin symmetry • other states • kaonic final states

  11. p-p-p+ Final State • Full 2008 statistics available: 96M events in high-t’, 5.8M a2(1320) • M=1 production on H suppressed compared to Pb • Acceptance corrections being finalized (MC description) • Wave set being optimized

  12. p-p0p0 Final State • Partial 2008 statistics, no acceptance correction • Normalization to a2(1320) intensity • Charged and neutral mode rely on different detectors  systematics • Isospinsymmetry • expect same intensity for isovector isobars (e.g. r) • expect half the intensity in neutral mode for isoscalar isobars (f0, f2) • acceptance being finalized, ECAL reconstruction being optimized

  13. Multi-Particle (>3) Final States • Motivation: • Higher masses accessible  many disputed states: 0-+, 1++, 2-+,... • p1(1400) observed in hp • p1(1600) observed in h’p, b1p, f1p • p1(2000) observed in b1p, f1p • JPC=1-+ hybrid decay modes • [Page, Swanson, Szczepaniak, PRD 59, 034016 (1999)] established need confirmation further states

  14. p-h Final State p-p+p0 invariant mass gg invariant mass h w Select Select a2(1320)  PWA requiredtoresolvesmallcontributions, e.g. p1(1400)

  15. p-p-p+h Final State p -p +h invariant mass f1(1285) f1(1285) h’ h’ Select Hybrid p1(1600) expected in this channel

  16. p-hh Final State COMPASS 53% of 2008 data No cut for central production applied  both diffractively and centrally produced states

  17. Kaonic Final States • Access to exotics, glueballs • Clarify flavor content and structure of resonance • Expand knowledge on kaon spectrum • Requires CEDAR & RICH PID • Channels: Diffractive states at 1.7 GeV/c2 and 2.2 GeV/c2, decaying to K*(892)

  18. Kaonic Final States Diffractive dissociation:   • >10 × BNL statistics • very clean spectrum • possibly also f1(1420) seen

  19. Data with Proton Beam • Only very short test in 2008 (early shutdown of North Area): • Beam: 190 GeV/c, 71.5% p, 25.5% p, 3.0% K • CEDARs tagging protons • Trigger: Recoil proton • ~10% of total 2008/2009 statistics • Baryon spectroscopy: • Central Production

  20. Baryon Spectroscopy

  21. Central Production • cut on

  22. Hadron Run 2009 • Goals: • collect data sample with positive beam on lH2 target (central production) • increase data sample with negative beam on lH2 target (central production) • complete data taking with negative beam on lH2 target (diffr., low-t) • take data with negative beam on nuclear targets (M-dep., statistics) • PS/SPS efficiency ~70% rather than 80% as assumed for request • lower data taking efficiency for COMPASS for low-t’ and ECAL trigger

  23. New Equipment for 2009 Run Silicon Microstrip Detectors: all five stations at 200K, stability < 1K ECAL2 upgrade: Pipelined readout completed (1000 ch. MSADC) ECAL1 monitoring: LED replaced by laser system Nuclear targets: Pb, W, Ni • New trigger elements: • Multiplicity trigger • Digital trigger for ECAL

  24. Trigger Diffractive TriggerDT0= BT  RPD  !Veto  high-t’: t’>0.07 GeV2/c2 • Multiplicity Trigger: Cover full range of t’ • 12 trapezoidal scintillator slabs, ø 62 cm • central disk scintillator with 83 cm air light guide • acceptance 180 mrad • LT1 = [≥ 1(2) outer slabs]  BT  !Veto • LT3 = [> 1.6(2.5) MIPS disk]  BT  !Veto • Digital Trigger for ECAL: high-energy photons • Implemented in existing FPGA of MSADC • Time and amplitude extraction for each cell • Prim = Esum(12×12 cells) > Ethr(50/70 GeV) • Efficiency > 98%, energy resolution = 3.3 GeV • Time resolution 0.8 ns

  25. Nuclear Targets • Goals: • study dependence of M-population on A • increase statistics on nuclear targets • Target holder: carbon fiber / fiber glass • Thin disks of Pb, W, Ni: 25-250 mm

  26. First Look at 2009 Data Nuclear Targets: p-p-p+ final state 2009: 8.1M events 3 × statistics of 2004 2009: 2.3M events 6 × statistics of 2004

  27. Conclusions on Hadron Analysis • Very high statistics, 10 – 200 × existing data sample • Many new channels being analyzed

  28. Conclusions on Hadron Analysis • Very high statistics, 10 – 200 × existing data sample • Many new channels being analyzed • Monte Carlo  acceptance corrections • very good description of setup necessary (no asymmetries!) • new hardware (2008/2009) implemented • very large data samples required • Calorimetry: • improvement & unification of reconstruction code (ECAL1/ECAL2) • calibration: electron beam + Laser/LED + p0 signal • PWA: • three different programs • careful selection of wave set for PWA due to small statistical errors • combined PWA of diffractive and central production • new formalism for baryonic resonances • new international task PWA force: COMPASS, JLAB, PANDA, …

  29. Conclusions on Hadron Analysis • Future data taking: based on results of ongoing analyses • Higher beam energies for cleaner separation of central production • All neutral final states with full ECAL trigger • Primakoff measurements with p-, p+, K  Addendum to COMPASS II Proposal

  30. New Results with Muon Beam • Muon beam 2007 with NH3 target: • Helicity distributions • Collins and Sivers asymmetries Gluon polarisation from open charm (2002-2007 data) Longitudinal spin transfer to L and Lbar in polarised DIS

  31. Helicity Distributions Longitudinal spin asymmetry: • Pb ≈ -80% • Pt ≈ 90% • f = 0.1-0.2 • improved precision of at low x • Q2[1,100] GeV2 • no Q2 dependence of A1 • data compatible with g1=const. • for x→0.004 [COMPASS, M.Alekseev et al., Phys. Lett. B 690, 466 (2010)]

  32. Bjorken Sum Rule Non-singlet spin structure function • Q2 evolution independent of singlet quark • and gluon densities • both g1p and g1n measured at COMPASS • 3-parameter NLO QCD fit 1st moment  Bjorken sum rule • ~92% of G1NS from measured region • saturation of integral only at lowest x 

  33. Collins Asymmetry Fragmentation of transversely polarised quarks to unpolarised hadrons Comparison with HERMES  COMPASS data with x>0.050

  34. Sivers Asymmetry Modulation of transverse momentum of unpolarisedquarks in a transversely polarised nucleon Comparison with HERMES  COMPASS data with x>0.032

  35. Gluon Polarisation from Open Charm p0 (2002-2007 data)

  36. Muon Run 2010 H1 hodoscope Pixel- Gem PA03-05 MWPC Polarized Target Cold Silicon SciFi 15 MM cooling H2 hodoscope

  37. Muon Run 2010 • Triggers: • (modified) 2007 triggers fully operational • Two new hodoscopes (H1, H2) not yet ready Installation: May 21 May 20

  38. Muon Run 2010 • Triggers: • (modified) 2007 triggers fully operational • Two new hodoscopes (H1, H2) not yet ready • to be operational by end of July 2007 June 10, 2010 • Polarized target: operational • Upgrade of control system for liq. 4He delivery system • New control system for new 4He pumps for cryogenic operation • Modification of cooling water infrastructure 24 h

  39. Muon Run 2010 • Triggers: • (modified) 2007 triggers fully operational • Two new hodoscopes (H1, H2) not yet ready • to be operational by end of July Polarized target: operational Detectors: all operational Physics data taking with transversely polarized target: started June 12

  40. Publications • Since 2009 status report: • Measurement of the Longitudinal Spin Transfer to Λ and Λ-bar Hyperons • in Polarized Muon DIS, Euro. Phys. J. C 64, 171 (2009). • Observation of a JPC = 1–+ exotic resonance in diffractive dissociation • of 190 GeV/c π– into π–π–π+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 241803 (2010). • The spin-dependent structure function of the proton g1p and a Test • of the Bjorken Sum Rule, Phys. Lett. B 690, 466 (2010). • Measurement of the Collins and Sivers asymmetries on transversely • polarised protons, submitted to Phys. Lett. B (2010), 1005.5609v1 [hep-ex].

  41. Conferences & Workshops • 2009: 91 COMPASS presentations • DIS2009: 9 talks • CIPANP 2009: 4 talks • HEP 2009: 3 talks • HADRON 2009: 9 talks • 2010: >20 COMPASS presentations • DIS 2010: 10 talks • MENU 2010: 3 talks • MESON 2010: 3 talks • QCD 2010: 3 talks

  42. Spare Slides

  43. Longitudinal Spin Transfer to L and L • Polarisedm (-0.80) DIS on unpolarised target (2003-2004): • Q2>1 GeV2/c2 • Fractional virtual photon • energy 0.2 < y < 0.9 • 30·107 DIS events  Spin transfer to L small (compatible with 0)  Spin transfer to L 0.4-0.5

  44. Flavor Separation • Longitudinal spin asymmetries • for identified pions and kaons in • SIDIS on NH3 target • combined with data on d and inclusive DIS • LO QCD analysis • Ds, Dsbar compatible with 0 • sea quark distributions small • no sizable x-dependence

More Related