1 / 21

SD assessment approach Case of Tunisia

SD assessment approach Case of Tunisia. Samir AMOUS - Rafik MISSAOUI (APEX-ALCOR). General context. Objective: The SD assessment approach is used to evaluate GHG mitigation options in order to elaborate a national action plan for GHG reduction through energy conservation .

tamal
Download Presentation

SD assessment approach Case of Tunisia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SD assessment approach Case ofTunisia Samir AMOUS - Rafik MISSAOUI (APEX-ALCOR)

  2. General context • Objective: The SD assessment approach is used to evaluate GHG mitigation options in order to elaborate a national action plan for GHG reduction through energy conservation. • Study done for: The National Energy Conservation Agency with Canadian Cooperation

  3. GHG mitigation options identification • 21 identified options • 12 options of demand side management in the residential-secondary sector (7), transport (4) and industry (1) • 4 options of energy supply management including RE • 5 transversal options • Base line calculation of each option until 2020 • GHG reduction estimation until 2020

  4. DS themes selection • Economic criteria • Social criteria • Environmental criteria • Strategic criteria

  5. Criteria and indictors selectionTheme: Economy • CE1 : Contribution to the economic activity increase • IE1 : Marginal business volume generated by the project • IE2 : Share of national production • CE2 : Economic efficiency improvement • IE3 : Investment Pay Back Period (for the nation) • IE4 : Internal Return Rate (IRR) • CE3 : National payment balance improvement • IE5 : Foreign currency conservation

  6. Criteria and indictors selectionTheme: Economy • CE4 : Reduction of public finance pressure • IE6 : Private investment share • IE7 : Direct foreign investment share • CE5 : National economy competitiveness improvement • IE8 : Global impact of the project on the economy competitiveness

  7. Criteria and indictors selectionTheme: social • CS1 : Local employment improvement • CS2 : National capacity building • CS3 : Increase of local communities contribution • CS4 : Contribution to poverty alleviation • CS5 : Contribution to life quality improvement of local population • CS6 : Contribution to population health improvement • CS7 : Women condition improvement

  8. Criteria and indictors selectionTheme: environment • CEN1 : Contribution to climate changes mitigation • CEN2 : Contribution to atmospheric pollution reduction • CEN3 : Contribution to water and soil pollution reduction • CEN4 : Contribution to local ecosystem protection and biodiversity • CEN5 : Sustainable use of natural resources

  9. SD criteria and indictors selectionTheme: Strategic criteria • CST1 : Risk reduction of energy dependency • CST2 : Technology transfer • CST3 : Contribution to industry diversification • CST4 : Strategic partnership development • CST5 : Contribution to inter-regional equilibrium

  10. SD theme weighting

  11. SD indicators weighting

  12. SD indicators weighting

  13. Global SD Wind energy Cogeneration WSH PV pumping EC for industry Optionsweighted marks

  14. Global SD Optionsweighted marks

  15. Global SD Optionsweighted marks

  16. Global SD Options weighted marks

  17. Feasibility criteriaSelection and weights

  18. CDM criteriaSelection and weights

  19. Feasibility and CDM options weighted marks

  20. Options weighted marks:SD, Feasibility and CDM

More Related