1 / 11

Security Cooperation and the Combatant Commands Brig Gen Maryanne Miller Deputy Director Partnership Strategy

Security Cooperation and the Combatant Commands Brig Gen Maryanne Miller Deputy Director Partnership Strategy . The overall classification for this brief is UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO. Security Cooperation and Building Partner Capacity. Overview Foundational Requirements

tamah
Download Presentation

Security Cooperation and the Combatant Commands Brig Gen Maryanne Miller Deputy Director Partnership Strategy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Security Cooperation and the Combatant Commands Brig Gen Maryanne Miller Deputy Director Partnership Strategy The overall classificationfor this brief is UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO

  2. Security Cooperation and Building Partner Capacity Overview • Foundational Requirements • Security Cooperation Reform Context • Factors contributing to BPC • Your role • Closing thoughts

  3. Foundational Requirements President Barack Obama “As we end today's wars, we will focus on a broader range of challenges and opportunities, including the security and prosperity of the Asia Pacific. As a new generation across the Middle East and North Africa demands their universal rights, we are supporting political and economic reform and deepening partnershipsto ensure regional security. In contrast to the murderous vision of violent extremists, we are joining with allies and partners around the world to build their capacity to promote security, prosperity, and human dignity. And the growing capabilities of allies and partners, as demonstrated in the successful mission to protect the Libyan people, create new opportunities for burden-sharing.”

  4. Foundational Requirements Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense (pg. 3) “Building partnership capacity elsewhere in the world also remains important for sharing costs and responsibilities of global leadership. Across the globe we will seek to be the security partner of choice, pursuing new partnerships with a growing number of nations—including those in Africa and Latin America—whose interests and viewpoints are emerging into a common vision of freedom, stability and prosperity. Whenever possible, we will develop innovative, low-cost and small-footprint approachesto achieve our security objectives, relying on exercise, rotational presence, and advisory capabilities.”

  5. UNCLASSIFIED Security Cooperation Reform Context • 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) • 2006 Building Partner Capacity (BPC) Roadmap • March 2009 meeting between the President and Combatant Commanders: “…conduct an initial review of requirements, authorities, and constraints associated with DoD aspects of security assistance.” [National Security Advisor] • June 2009 SecDef’s Initial Review: “Many of the issues identified in this assessment cannot be addressed by DOD alone, so the Department’s key recommendation is that the NSC lead a follow-on review…” [SecDef] • December 2009 Shared Responsibilities / Pooled Resources Concept: “…debates have taxed the time and energy of our departments and do not meet the nation’s long-term needs.” [SecDef] • December 2009 Export Control Reform: “…a broad-based interagency review of the current U.S. export control system.” [POTUS] • July 2010 Security Cooperation Reform Task Force: … [DepSecDef] • July 2010 CJCS Assessment of Foreign Military Sales (FMS)… [CJCS] • July 2010 Technology Security and Foreign Disclosure (TS&FD) Review: “…balance the often-conflicting DoD policy objectives of building allied and friendly nation partner capacity while maintaining U.S. leading-edge capabilities…” [DepSecDef] UNCLASSIFIED

  6. UNCLASSIFIED Many Factors Contribute to Building Partner Capacity Lift & Sustain CRSP 1206 ACSA CTFP Advocacy YockeyWaiver US Exports ENDP CFIUS PKO INCLE DIRI OHDACA SPP State Partnership Program MODA USMLvs CCL Humanitarian Assistance Freedom of Navigation & Port Visits CN JCET CE2 Regional Forums CSF Excess Defense Articles Country Specific FMS Info Access & Basing Agreements UN Peacekeeping Ops Bilateral/ Multilateral Exercises CCIF High Level Defense Talks 1202 Authority/ Resources Process FMS Prioritization & Process Refinement Special Defense Acquisition Funds (Stockpile) Security Cooperation Reform Task Force Tool Program Regionals/ CCMDs Security Sector Assistance IPC Activity Security Cooperation Workforce Education & Training Export Control Reform Expeditionary Requirements Generation Teams Humanitarian Assistance/ Disaster Relief Arms Transfer & Technology Release SSG G-TSCMIS Building Partner Capacity DoD Title 10 Funding Authority Train & Equip Coalition Partners Mass Atrocity Prevention & Response Operations Technology Security & Foreign Disclosure State Title 22 Funding Authority FMF National Disclosure Policy Committee Educate IMET Regional Centers PCCF Global Security Contingency Fund Public Private Partnerships IPC IMET UNCLASSIFIED

  7. UNCLASSIFIED Many Factors Contribute to Building Partner Capacity US Exports ENDP CFIUS Freedom of Navigation & Port Visits CRSP Humanitarian Assistance State Partnership Program High Level Defense Talks Excess Defense Articles Country Specific FMS Info Bilateral/ Multilateral Exercises CE2 UN Peacekeeping Ops 1206 OHDACA Regional Forums JCET SPP USMLvs CCL Lift & Sustain Access & Basing Agreements Advocacy YockeyWaiver PKO ACSA MODA CCIF CN CTFP CSF DIRI INCLE 1202 “Interagency Efforts” Authority/ Resources Process FMS Prioritization & Process Refinement Special Defense Acquisition Funds (Stockpile) Security Cooperation Reform Task Force Tool Program Regionals/ CCMDs Security Sector Assistance IPC Activity Security Cooperation Workforce Education & Training Interagency (outline) Export Control Reform Expeditionary Requirements Generation Teams Humanitarian Assistance/ Disaster Relief Arms Transfer & Technology Release SSG G-TSCMIS Building Partner Capacity DoD Title 10 Funding Authority Train & Equip Coalition Partners Mass Atrocity Prevention & Response Operations Technology Security & Foreign Disclosure State Title 22 Funding Authority FMF National Disclosure Policy Committee Educate IMET Regional Centers PCCF Global Security Contingency Fund Public Private Partnerships IPC IMET UNCLASSIFIED

  8. UNCLASSIFIED Your Role • Provide the strategic-to-operational link to the partner country from the CCMD and the Joint Staff • Match U.S./CCMD objectives with partner requirements (or desires) • Often can better translate what the partner says they want into what they may, in fact, need • These needs must be aligned with the CCMD’s Country Plan and the Theater Campaign Plan • Can include FMS, FMF, IMET, bilateral exercise opportunities, or coalition efforts • Laundry list of responsibilities in DISAM’sThe Management of Security Cooperation, aka the “Green Book” UNCLASSIFIED

  9. TCP Handbook Foundational Training

  10. UNCLASSIFIED Closing thoughts • Don’t hesitate to reach out to the Joint Staff • Encourage dialog with your regional directorate • Regional and functional directorates can help provide clarity/coordination on JS policy/program objectives • We coordinate many key programs, 1206, GSCF, FMF, IMET, HA/DR, Exceptions to National Disclosure Policy • Can provide reach-back to OSD UNCLASSIFIED

  11. UNCLASSIFIED Questions / Discussion The overall classificationfor this brief is UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO UNCLASSIFIED

More Related