1 / 8

Criteria for successful policy integration

Criteria for successful policy integration. Oliver Lah 11-12/09/2014. Criteria topics. The policy’s alignment with broader priorities Supportive environment at the local level Striking a policy balance Facilitation of integration through cooperation

talon-carpenter
Download Presentation

Criteria for successful policy integration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Criteria for successful policy integration Oliver Lah 11-12/09/2014

  2. Criteria topics • The policy’s alignment with broader priorities • Supportive environment at the local level • Striking a policy balance • Facilitation of integration through cooperation • Ensuring accountability during implementation and afterwards

  3. Policy alignment The policy’s alignment with broader priorities • Alignment of the local policy with regional, national and EU-level frameworks and goals • Integration of the policy into a broader local-level plan For example: • Munich’s TDP embedded in the broader plan, Perspektive München • The Netherlands’ national LEV policies synergies with EU laws

  4. Local support Supportive environment at the local level • Openness to the take-up of solutions that originate from departments not directly involved with transport For example: • Lund’s and Munich’s inter-departmental consultation processes

  5. Policy balance Striking a balance in the policy measure(s) • Policies that encourage complementary transport modes • Creating complementary push and pull measures For example: • TDP’s aim of a modal shift toward cycling • The Netherlands’ Motor vehicle Tax and subsidies on LEVs

  6. Cooperation Facilitating integration through cooperation • Clearly defined roles for inter-departmental cooperation and for interaction at various government levels • Capacity-building for collaborative policy development • Thinking, planning and acting as a wider urban area For example: • Lund’s and Munich’s cooperative processes • Krakow’s TeleBus, connecting outer areas

  7. Responsibility Ensuring accountability during implementation and follow-through: • Policy implementation plan which ensures continued accountability across departments • Re-evaluation of the policy at regular intervals For example: • Munich’s Planning Department is responsible for the TDP; other departments must consult them regarding transport-related projects • Lund’s update of LundaMaTs with a widened vision

  8. Thank you for your attention! Oliver Lah oliver.lah@wupperinst.org

More Related