1 / 36

3 rd Round EQA Preparatory Meeting

3 rd Round EQA Preparatory Meeting. 21 and 23 September 2011 A.52. Agenda. EQA Program. EQA Program. Indicators of ONESQA System. Three categories of 18 indicators. Three Categories. Basic Indicators ( กลุ่มตัวบ่งชี้พื้นฐาน ) Identity Indicators ( กลุ่มตัวบ่งชี้อัตลักษณ์ )

talbot
Download Presentation

3 rd Round EQA Preparatory Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 3rd Round EQA Preparatory Meeting 21 and 23 September 2011 A.52

  2. Agenda

  3. EQA Program

  4. EQA Program

  5. Indicators of ONESQA System • Three categories of 18 indicators

  6. Three Categories • Basic Indicators (กลุ่มตัวบ่งชี้พื้นฐาน) • Identity Indicators (กลุ่มตัวบ่งชี้อัตลักษณ์) • Societal Reinforcement Indicators (กลุ่มตัวบ่งชี้มาตรการส่งเสริม)

  7. 1. Basic Indicators (กลุ่มตัวบ่งชี้พื้นฐาน) • Quality of Graduates • Bachelor’s degree graduates who can secure jobs and who can be self-employed within one year • Quality of Bachelor’s, Master’s and Doctoral degree graduates in compliance with the TQF and the learning outcomes of the learners • Publications of the Master’s degree theses • Publications of the Doctoral degree dissertations

  8. 1. Basic Indicators (กลุ่มตัวบ่งชี้พื้นฐาน) • Research and Creative Works • Publication and dissemination of research / creative works • Utilization of research / creative works • Quality of academic works

  9. 1. Basic Indicators (กลุ่มตัวบ่งชี้พื้นฐาน) • Academic Services 8. Use of the knowledge and experiences derived from the academic and professional services to develop the teaching / learning and research 9. Academic and professional service activities/ projects strengthening the community / society

  10. 1. Basic Indicators (กลุ่มตัวบ่งชี้พื้นฐาน) • Arts and Cultures Preservation 10. Promotion of arts and cultures 11. Aesthetical development in artistic and cultural dimensions

  11. 1. Basic Indicators (กลุ่มตัวบ่งชี้พื้นฐาน) • Institution Administration and Development 12. University council’s performance 13. University administrators’ performance 14. Faculty development

  12. 1. Basic Indicators (กลุ่มตัวบ่งชี้พื้นฐาน) • Quality Assurance System Development 15. Results of the internal quality assurance

  13. 2. IDENTITY INDICATORS(กลุ่มตัวบ่งชี้อัตลักษณ์) 16. Accomplishment of the AU identities 16.1 Accomplishment of the AU administration based on its identities 16.2 Accomplishment of the graduates based on the AU identities 17. Accomplishment according to prominences and strengths reflecting AU uniqueness

  14. 3. SOCIETAL REINFORCEMENT INDICATORS(กลุ่มตัวบ่งชี้มาตรการส่งเสริม) 18. Accomplishment of societal reinforcement 18.1 Accomplishment of societal reinforcement(internal activity) 18.2 Accomplishment of societal reinforcement (external activity)

  15. Data Preparation • Three-year data (2008 – 2010) for indicators of quantity (if not available, use data 2010) • Data 2010 only for indicators of quality

  16. Indicator 1(only for undergraduate programs) • Bachelor’s degree graduates who can secure jobs and who can be self-employed within one year • See how to compute and explanation in ONESQA manual (page 19). • Evidence: • Job placement survey by RIAU • Job placement survey by the faculty • Online Graduation Registration (OGR) http://www.graduation.au.edu/

  17. Indicator 2 • Quality of Bachelor’s, Master’s and Doctoral degree graduates in compliance with the TQF and the learning outcomes of the learners. • Evidence: • Competency and Effectiveness Index by RIAU • Stakeholder Satisfaction Index by RIAU (including Market Employer Satisfaction)

  18. Indicator 3 (only for faculties with graduate programs) • Publications of the Master’s degree theses • Have the sum of weighted scores of publications divided by the number of master graduates. • Check weights of the journals, conference proceedings, and databases (see the correction sheet for page 21). • Evidence: • Only list of publications is not enough. • Prepare the real evidence or copies of the publications such as printed proceedings or journals, CDs, internet links, etc.

  19. Indicator 4 (only for faculties with graduate programs) • Publications of the Doctoral degree dissertations • Have the sum of weighted scores of publications divided by the number of doctoral graduates. • Check weights of the journals, conference proceedings, and databases (see page 23). • Evidence: • Only list of publications is not enough. • Prepare the real evidence or copies of the publications such as printed proceedings or journals, CDs, internet links, etc.

  20. Indicator 5 (for faculty members and researchers) • Publication and dissemination of research or creative works • Have the sum of weighted scores of publications divided by the number of full-time faculty members and researchers. • Check weights of the journals, conference proceedings, and databases (see page 26). • For creative works, check weights on page 27. • Evidence: • Only list of publications is not enough. • Prepare the real evidence or copies of the publications such as printed proceedings or journals, CDs, internet links, etc.

  21. Indicator 6 • Utilization of research and creative works • Formula is on page 29. • Read the explanation and the required evidence carefully. • Evidence: • Evidence to certify the utilization of research/creative works by the relevant organization(s) with the clear explanation of how research/creative works are utilized.

  22. Indicator 7 • Quality of academic works • Include academic articles, books, and textbooks. • Each type has different weights. • Evidence: • Only list of articles, books, and textbooks is not enough. • Prepare the real evidence or copies of the publications such as books, textbooks, printed proceedings or journals, CDs, internet links, etc.

  23. Indicator 8 • Use of the knowledge and experiences derived from the academic and professional services to develop the teaching / learning and research • Have the number of academic activities/projects used to develop teaching/learning and research divided by the total number of academic activities/projects and multiplied by 100. • Evidence: • Evidence of integrating knowledge and experience from academic services with teaching, research, books, and textbooks. • Course syllabus, research articles, books, textbooks.

  24. Indicator 9 • Academic and professional service activities/ projects strengthening the community/society or external organizations • 5 criteria to check (see page 33) • See examples in University’s SAR (page 145-163) • Thesis/dissertation examiners • Editorial board members/peer reviewers • Journal publications • Training/seminar/conference organization • Etc. • Evidence: • Plan or projects strengthening community or society • Report, budget, or any evidence showing the implementation of the project • Letters of appreciation, photos, videos, etc.

  25. Indicator 10 • Promotion of arts and cultures • 5 criteria to check (see page 35) • You may use the faculty’s projects or university’s projects e.g. those organized by Student Affairs • Evidence: • Policies, plans and mechanisms that promote arts and cultures • Report, budget, or any evidence showing the implementation, persistence, and utility of the project • Rewards, recognitions at the national/ international level

  26. Indicator 11 • Aesthetical development in artistic and cultural dimensions(การพัฒนาสุนทรียภาพในมิติทางศิลปะและวัฒนธรรม) - 5 criteria to check (see page 36) • You may use the faculty’s projects or university’s projects • Evidence: • Cultural activities or projects of each faculty that promote cleanliness, hygiene, and aesthetical values. • Hua Mak Campus • Suvarnabhumi Campus

  27. Indicator 12 • University council’s performance • University level

  28. Indicator 13 • University administrators’ performance • The committee appointed by the university assessed and scored Dean’s performance.

  29. Indicator 14 • Faculty development • Have the sum of weighted scores of quality of faculty members based on academic titles and academic qualifications divided by the total number of full-time faculty members (including all those who are on leave for further study). • Check weights on page 40. • Evidence: • List of full-time faculty members with academic titles and qualifications. • Beware of borrowed names and number of faculty members.

  30. Indicator 15 • Results of the internal quality assurance (page 42) • Use the assessment results of the academic year 2010 only (because we are to be assessed this year).

  31. Indicator 16.1 • Accomplishment of the Au administration based on its identities • University level (personnel’ s satisfaction) • Au identities (3 E’s) • English proficiency • Ethics and Morals • Entrepreneurship • Bear in mind that the score of satisfaction must not be less than 3.51 out of 5.

  32. Indicator 16.2 • Accomplishment of the graduates based on the Au identities • University level (stakeholder’s satisfaction) • Au identities (3 E’s) • English proficiency • Ethics and Morals • Entrepreneurship

  33. Indicator 17 • Accomplishment according to prominences and strengths reflecting AU uniqueness(page 194) • University level (personnel’ s satisfaction) • Au uniqueness: “International Community under Catholic Education” • Internationalization of Curriculum • Bear in mind that the score of satisfaction must not be less than 3.51 out of 5. • N.B.: If the faculty wants to assess its own uniqueness, it must be approved by the University Council.

  34. Indicator 18.1 • Accomplishment of societal reinforcement(internal activity) • University level • Optional for faculty level

  35. Indicator 18.2 • Accomplishment of societal reinforcement (external activity) • University level • Optional for faculty level

  36. Q&AThank you

More Related