1 / 30

Instruments we may need

Instruments we may need . or may not. This session:. MuSiCoS, Narval & ESPaDONs archive (James) DAO (Jason) Archive observations (Luca). Part I The most obvious choices. Optical spectroscopy and spectropolarimetry. High resolution spectropolarimetry Narval @ Pic-du-Midi.

talasi
Download Presentation

Instruments we may need

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Instruments we may need or may not

  2. This session: • MuSiCoS, Narval & ESPaDONs archive (James) • DAO (Jason) • Archive observations (Luca) Armagh, 19 February 2008

  3. Part IThe most obvious choices • Optical spectroscopy and spectropolarimetry Armagh, 19 February 2008

  4. High resolution spectropolarimetryNarval @ Pic-du-Midi Armagh, 19 February 2008

  5. High resolution spectropolarimetryESPaDONs @ CHFT Armagh, 19 February 2008

  6. High resolution spectropolarimetryDAO Armagh, 19 February 2008

  7. High resolution spectropolarimetryHARPS @ ESO? Armagh, 19 February 2008

  8. Low resolution spectropolarimetry(FORS1/2 @ ESO) Armagh, 19 February 2008

  9. Low resolution spectropolarimetry Armagh, 19 February 2008

  10. V/I = -4.67 x 10–132 dI/d 1/I <Bz> + V0/I0 <Bz> = -9000 +/- 150 G Armagh, 19 February 2008

  11. Low resolution spectropolarimetry(ISIS @ WHT) Armagh, 19 February 2008

  12. Low resolution spectropolarimetryRSS @ SALT? Armagh, 19 February 2008

  13. Low res. spectropolarimetry:Advantages and drawbacks • Extremely efficient on hot and fast rotating stars • No additional use other than for field determinations Armagh, 19 February 2008

  14. High resolution spectroscopy:Sophie@Haute-Provence Armagh, 19 February 2008

  15. High resolution spectroscopy:FIES @ NOT Armagh, 19 February 2008

  16. UCLES@AAT Armagh, 19 February 2008

  17. High resolution spectroscopy(UVES @ VLT) Armagh, 19 February 2008

  18. High/mid-to-low resolution multi-object spectroscopy: FLAMES@VLT Armagh, 19 February 2008

  19. High/mid-to-low resolution multi-object spectroscopy: FLAMES@VLT Armagh, 19 February 2008

  20. High/mid-to-low resolution multi-object spectroscopy: FLAMES@VLT Armagh, 19 February 2008

  21. FLAMES Fiber Large Array Multi-Element Spectrograph • 132 GIRAFFE Medusa buttons • 30 GIRAFFE IFU buttons • 8 UVES buttons Armagh, 19 February 2008

  22. FLAMES Fiber Large Array Multi-Element Spectrograph FLAMES high resolution settings Armagh, 19 February 2008

  23. FLAMES Fiber Large Array Multi-Element Spectrograph FLAMES low resolution settings Armagh, 19 February 2008

  24. From less obvious to exotic • Photometry • Multi-objects vs. 3D spectroscopy • IR Imaging and spectroscopy • Interferometry • Radio • X-rays, UV • Astrometry (Gaia) Armagh, 19 February 2008

  25. REM Armagh, 19 February 2008

  26. 3-D spectroscopy • Are we interested? Armagh, 19 February 2008

  27. NIR high resolution spectroscopy:CRIRES @ VLT • R=100,000 • Spectral coverage = 5 nm! Armagh, 19 February 2008

  28. Future instruments: SPIROU@CHFT • Spectral coverage: 0.9 to 2.5 m • Spectral resolution: R=50,000 • 15% throughput • S/N ratio = 100 with 1h exp on a J=13 star • Commissioning on 2013 Armagh, 19 February 2008

  29. GIANO @ TNG • Similar to Spirou • Commissioning in 2009 • Attached at the Nasmith Armagh, 19 February 2008

  30. High resolution NIR imagingNACO@VLT • FWHM < 0.05” in JHK Armagh, 19 February 2008

More Related