Social capital and the creation of knowledge
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 13

Social Capital and the Creation of Knowledge PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 47 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Social Capital and the Creation of Knowledge. Claudia Gonzalez-Brambila Francisco Veloso David Krackhardt. INFORMS, November 2006. Outline. Introduction Objective The data Importance The models Results Conclusions. Introduction. “Social capital metaphor is that

Download Presentation

Social Capital and the Creation of Knowledge

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Social capital and the creation of knowledge

Social Capital and the Creation of Knowledge

Claudia Gonzalez-Brambila

Francisco Veloso

David Krackhardt

INFORMS, November 2006


Outline

Outline

  • Introduction

  • Objective

  • The data

  • Importance

  • The models

  • Results

  • Conclusions


Introduction

Introduction

“Social capital metaphor is that

people who do better are

somehow better connected”

  • Critical question is what is social capital?

    • Coleman (1988): Actors in embedded networks have superior achievements

      • Members obtain more coordination, they trust each other and develop better communication skills.

    • Burt (1992): Actors in open social structures with many structural holes, do better

      • Members can take advantage of “bridges” to connect with new members in other clusters, and get access to new information


Introduction1

Introduction

  • Growing importance of production, dissemination and use of knowledge

  • Little understanding of what determines how such crucial knowledge is created

  • The interaction between individuals plays a critical role – social capital

  • Growing attention to the role of collaborative effort in the process of scientific knowledge generation


Objectives

Objectives

  • Paper examines the relationship between social capital and knowledge creation

    • Knowledge creation is research output and impact in the area of Natural Sciences

    • Creation process measured using publications and citations in ISI – Web of Science

    • Social capital is measured through co-authorship


The data

The Data

  • Data from SNI – National System of Researchers in Mexico

  • Information on 1,704 researchers in Natural Sciences that have been part of the SNI from 1991 to 2002

  • Information on all their publications in ISI Web of Science from 1981 to 2002

    • Publications per year

    • Citations per year

    • Authors per publication


Importance

Importance

  • Study enables analysis of most critical aspects of social capital:

    • Embeddedness

    • Positioning

    • Network Structure

  • Considers panel data with entire network

  • Study outside developed world - Mexico


Critical aspects of social capital

Critical Aspects of Social Capital

  • Relational dimension:

    • Direct ties

    • Strengths of direct ties

  • Structural dimension

    • Density

    • Structural holes

    • Centrality

    • External-Internal index in terms of fields of knowledge


The models

The Models

  • Dependent variables:

    • Number of publications

    • Number of cites in the subsequent 4 years

  • Methods:

    • Negative Binomial fixed effects

  • Pit = F (Xit-1, ci, uit)

    • Xit-1: varies in both dimensions

      • number of direct ties, strength of direct ties, structural holes, density, normalized eigenvector (centrality), external-internal index,

      • Controls – past reputation and output, time

    • ci: individual unobserved effect

    • uit: error

    • Times: t-> 2 years; t-1 -> 3 years


Some results

Some Results

*** significant at 0.1%, ** significant at 1%, * significant at 5%


Conclusions

Conclusions

  • Factors of social capital that consistently enhance productivity and impact:

    • Number of direct ties

    • Non dense networks

  • Influence output productivity, not impact

    • Centrality

    • Collaboration with researchers in other disciplines

  • Influence impact but not output productivity

    • Strenght of Direct ties


Conclusions1

Conclusions

  • The structural holes variable is not significant when other variables are included

    • This variable has been used as the main measure of social capital

  • It is critical to control for various dimensions of social capital, as well as for unobserved individual heterogeneity


Questions comments suggestions

Questions, Comments, Suggestions

Thank you


  • Login