Search for Academic Excellence in Public Universities through Multi-level Leadership Practices
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 23

Presenter: Ngo Tuyet Mai, School of Education University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 147 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Search for Academic Excellence in Public Universities through Multi-level Leadership Practices : Lessons Learnt from East Asia. Presenter: Ngo Tuyet Mai, School of Education University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Why University Leadership?. “University leadership matters.”

Download Presentation

Presenter: Ngo Tuyet Mai, School of Education University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Presenter ngo tuyet mai school of education university of new south wales sydney australia

Search for Academic Excellence in Public Universities through Multi-level Leadership Practices:Lessons Learnt from East Asia

Presenter: Ngo Tuyet Mai,

School of Education

University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia


Why university leadership

Why University Leadership?

  • “University leadership matters.”

    (e.g., Fullan, 2005; Hallinger, 2007; Millett, 1978; Mulford, 2010; Ramsden, 1998).

  • “Good leadership is conceivably the most practical and cost-effective strategy known to organizations … It can transform the commonplace and average into the remarkable and excellent…It creates an environment for better academic work.”

    (Ramsden, 1998, p.363)

    “The changing landscape of higher education requires new thinking and updated leadership practices.” (ADB, 2012)


Why leadership actions

Why Leadership Actions?

National Government, universities and their sub-organizational units (departments) are ‘corporate actors’ who can act and need to act. He or she can act in a certain function or from a certain ‘corporate’ position.”

(Binsbergen et al., 1994, p.223)


Why leadership actions1

Why Leadership Actions?

  • “Leadership is the particular actions of leaders…Leadership resides in the eye of the beholder (subjectivist/interpretivist) or in the actions of leaders (objectivist/functionalist)”

    (Middlehurst, 1993, p.19)

  • “Organizations’ intelligence is seen in leaders’ actions”

    (Hanson, 2001, p.644).

    “Leaders must be ‘people of actions’”

    (Ramsden, 1998, p.9).


Leaders actions in university contexts

Leaders’ Actions in University Contexts

Actions concerning PRIMARY processes

(academic tasks)

Actions concerning SECONDARY processes

(supportive tasks)


Why incentives promoting actions

Why Incentives Promoting Actions?

  • The function of university leadership is to provide [promote] incentives for academics to achieve academic excellence

    (Kehm & Lazendorf (2007, p.171)

  • “Any success of public actions depends on the adequacy of incentives that they offer to individual units”

    (Varghese, 2004, p.30)

  • “Successful reforms in higher education in the recent past were those with incentives to the academic staff”

    (Zheng, 1997)


Why multi level leadership

Why Multi-level Leadership?

A Multi-level Model

Of

University Leadership

MACRO DECISION LEVEL

(Government/Ministry Leadership Actions

MESO IMPLEMENTATION LEVEL

(Executive University Leadership Actions)

MICRO IMPLEMENTATION LEVEL

(Departmental Leadership Actions )


Presentation focus

Presentation Focus

  • Multi-level University Leadership Actions of Promoting Incentives for Academic Excellence in Practice: Empirical Case Studies

  • Implications for Practice: East Asian Lessons for Vietnam

  • Concluding Remarks


Key research questions

Key Research Questions

  • WHAT do macro, meso and micro leaders in East Asian flagship public universities do in promoting incentives towards achieving universities’ academic excellence?

  • WHAT can Vietnam learn from other East Asian public university’s multi level leadership practices?


University leadership in practice an empirical study 2012

University Leadership In Practice: An Empirical Study (2012)


Presenter ngo tuyet mai school of education university of new south wales sydney australia

METHODOLOGY CHART

Data Collection and Sources

National

Documents

University Documents

Interviews

Questionnaire Survey

Qualitative Database

Quantitative Database

Thematic Analysis: Using Nvivo 9

Statistical Analysis:

SPSS 20

Descriptive statistics

Scale Alpha Reliability

Evidence of Meso Leaders’ Actions

Evidence of Macro Leaders’ Actions

Evidence of Micro Leaders’ Actions

A Multi-level Model of Leadership Actions


Research sites in east asia 4 flagship public universities

Research Sites in East Asia: 4 Flagship Public Universities

http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/asian-university-rankings

http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2011-2012/top-400.html


Macro leaders actions analysis of government documents and websites

Macro Leaders’ Actions: Analysis of Government Documents and Websites


Meso leaders actions analysis of interviews with executive leaders

Meso Leaders’ Actions: Analysis of Interviews with Executive Leaders


Cross national comparison university leaders actions in focus

Cross-National Comparison: University Leaders Actions in Focus


Micro leaders readiness for actions analysis of questionnaire survey

Micro Leaders’ Readiness for Actions: Analysis of Questionnaire Survey


Cross national departmental leaders readiness for incentive promoting actions

Cross-National Departmental Leaders’ Readiness for Incentive Promoting Actions


Implication 1 policy initiatives and leadership actions

Implication 1: Policy Initiatives and Leadership Actions

  • Government Policy Initiatives: Regulations by Directives vs. Regulations by incentives

  • University Policy Initiatives

    PLUS

    Specific, focused, strategic leadership actions

    Establish a database of effective multi-level university leadership practices


Implication 2 for leadership practice

Implication 2 for Leadership Practice

Direct the job to be done (Task Structuring)

Coordinate and foster the work team as a whole

Support and review the individual people doing it


Implication 3 financial incentives and social incentives

Implication 3: Financial Incentives and Social Incentives

  • 'social incentives' (high appreciations/regards)

  • 'financial incentives' (money rewards)

    (Kehm & Lazendorf, 2007, p.157)

    “Incentives should be individualized to the greatest extent possible given the nature of the education organization”

    (Windham, 1997, p.47)


Implication 4 strategic leadership actions

Implication 4: Strategic Leadership Actions

  • A single action can be multi-functional (Adair, 1988)

  • “A single input by a leader can have multiple outcomes” (Mulford, 2010, p.187)

  • Actions balancing 3 inter-connected needs (1) the task to be performed, (2) the team responsible for performing them, (3) the individuals in that team (Adair, 1988, p.1)

  • Success, therefore, will depend on which elements and in what sequence the education leader chooses to spend time and attention on (Mulford, 2007, 2010).


Wrap up practical lessons learnt from the empirical study

Wrap-up: Practical Lessons Learnt From The Empirical Study

  • INSTRUMENTS OF AUTHORITY:

  • Increasing Autonomy

  • Empower more, control less

  • INSTRUMENTS OF DIRECT ACTIONS:

  • Individual needs focused

  • Focused Efforts on Academic Goals,

  • A System of Coordinated and Collective Leadership Actions


Concluding remarks

Concluding Remarks

“It may be a mistake to believe that all leadership actions must come from ‘leaders’”

(Birnbaum,1989, p.134)

“The elements for successful university leadership involve being contextually “literate”, organizationally “savvy” and leadership “smart”.”

(Bill Mulford, 2010, p.187)


  • Login