Demand side management in india
Download
1 / 47

Demand Side Management in India - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 244 Views
  • Uploaded on

Demand Side Management in India. Jitendra Sood, Energy Economist Bureau of Energy Efficiency, India. Content . Energy trends in India Design for best DSM practices in India Utility driven energy efficiency programmes Super efficient appliances. Energy Trends in India. Growth Pattern.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Demand Side Management in India' - taini


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Demand side management in india

Demand Side Management in India

Jitendra Sood, Energy Economist

Bureau of Energy Efficiency, India


Content
Content

  • Energy trends in India

  • Design for best DSM practices in India

  • Utility driven energy efficiency programmes

  • Super efficient appliances



Per capita consumption of electricity in india

Growth Pattern

Per Capita Consumption of Electricity in India

Source: CEA

(Projected)

As per UN Methodology (Gross Electrical Energy Availability / Population)


India intensity trends
India - Intensity Trends

Economic growth has been much faster; energy intensity and carbon intensity has been declining


Energy intensity is amongst the lowest in the world
Energy Intensity is amongst the lowest in the world

  • Japan, Denmark, UK and Brazil have lower energy intensity

  • Energy intensity is declining at about 1.5% per year


Energy trends in india
Energy Trends in India

  • Energy consumption in India is low

    • Per capita energy consumption is 530 kgoe; world average is 1770 kgoe.

    • Per capita electricity consumption is 704 kWh against world average of 2500 kWh

    • Increase in quality of life (HDI) requires increase in energy consumption

  • Energy demand is increasing due to rising incomes, accelerated industrialization, urbanization and population growth

    • 2003-04 572 Mtoe

    • 2016-17 : 842-916 Mtoe

    • 2026-27 : 1406-1561 Mtoe

  • The country is facing power shortages :

    • Peak shortage = 15.2 % ,

    • Average shortage = 9 %

  • Meeting the increasing demand only through increases in supply may lead to:

    • Reduced energy security due to volatility in availability and prices of imported fuels

    • Adverse environmental impacts

    • Strain on balance of payments



Reduction in generation capacity due to energy efficiency interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

3.5 BU in 2007-08 and 6.5 BU during 2008-09 is saved

9


Electrical Energy Consumption and Conservation Potential interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

Source: BEE/ NPC Study 2009


Dsm potential opportunities of energy savings
DSM-Potential & opportunities of Energy Savings interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

1-42


Design for Best DSM practices in India interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09


Rationale for designing best dsm practices
Rationale for designing best DSM practices interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

Almost all the States are not able to meet the electricity demand of the electrified areas

Demand Side Management initiatives are still in nascent stage

Existing initiatives by various utilities are either pilot programmes or demonstration projects

Very little quality information available about the existing schemes

No information available on post implementation project performance


Stakeholders in the design of dsm initiatives
Stakeholders in the design of DSM initiatives interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09


Steps in the design of dsm projects
Steps in the design of DSM projects interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09


Role of distribution utilities
Role of Distribution Utilities interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

Undertake load research studies and pursue DSM options in various sectors

Institutional capacity - Create dedicated DSM cells within the utility to plan, implement and monitor DSM measures

Consumer awareness

Develop necessary infrastructure for implementation


Role of electricity regulatory commissions
Role of Electricity Regulatory commissions interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

Direct distribution utilities to create DSM cells

Direct distribution utilities to submit DSM Plans along with ARR/APR Proposals for next tariff period

Develop a mechanism to enable utilities to recover the costs incurred in performing DSM related activities

Develop guidelines for evaluating DSM options

Develop guidelines / methodologies to be adopted for integrating DSM options with supply side options

Develop suitable incentive mechanism which will enable sharing of benefits between the consumers and the utilities


Role of bee ministry of power
Role of BEE/Ministry of Power interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

National DSM Policy.

Identification of sectors and end-uses suitable for DSM and help create appropriate programme design for ease of implementation.

Identification of DSM measures or technologies within the identified end-use.

Development of appropriate policy/ programme, financial, commercial and regulatory framework for implementation of identified DSM measures.

Coordination with various agencies of Central and State Governments for implementation of DSM measures.

Identification of capacity building requirements for implementation of such DSM programmes within stakeholders as well as implementing partners and make appropriate arrangements for their development and implementation.

Arrange suitable training programmes for stakeholders for design and implementation of DSM programmes for high replicability.

Create awareness among various stakeholders about energy conservation and need for DSM programmes.

Provide necessary support to ERCs/ Utilities.


Role of state governments
Role of State Governments interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

Financially support the pilot programmes in various sectors to enable the market transformation

Take necessary steps to enhance the effectiveness of SDAs in planning & implementing DSM measures in co-ordination with utilities

Enable fiscal incentives to promote the use energy efficient appliances


Utility driven energy efficiency programmes interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09


Utility driven dsm
Utility driven DSM interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

The utility driven measures to incentivise DSM are:

  • Tariff Reforms

  • Load Management Directives

  • Public awareness campaigns

  • Funding Options for DSM

  • Sector specific programmes in Municipalities/ Agriculture.


What is demand side management
What is Demand Side Management interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

  • In the electricity industry, ‘demand side management’ (DSM) is used to refer to actions which change the demand on the electricity system, including:

    • Actions taken on the customer side of the electricity meter (the ‘demand side’); such as energy efficiency measures

    • Fuel switching, such as changing from electricity to gas for water heating

    • Distributed generation, such as stand by generators in office building or PV modules on rooftops; and

    • Pricing initiatives; including time of use and demand based tariffs


Peak clipping
Peak Clipping interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

Common DSM implementation strategies

Conservation

Load Building

Valley Filling

Load Shifting


Agricultural municipal dsm
Agricultural & Municipal DSM interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

  • Over 35% of electricity consumed by Agriculture and Municipal sector.

  • High inefficiencies in pumping system- targeted through a subsidy reduction approach; Business model linked to subsidy reduction being evolved.

  • Shelf of bankable DPRs to be prepared- to stimulate the market.

  • Baseline development, conducive regulatory regime and payment security mechanism being worked out.

  • Awareness and outreach to local and municipal bodies.

  • • Risk mitigation measures for encouraging PPP being evolved CDM benefits for the scheme being put in.

  • Ag DSM pilot projects started in 5 States : Maharashtra, Gujarat, Punjab, Rajasthan, Haryana, Rajasthan.


Findings of dprs 5 states
Findings of DPRs- 5 States interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09


Cost benefit analysis country
Cost Benefit Analysis-Country interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

No. of agriculture connections in the country : 13.4 Million

Total investment envisaged (INR crores) : 33470

Conservative estimate of Energy savings (in MU) : 27790

Avoided generation capacity (in MW) : 4910

Avoided power purchase (in MU) : 32694

Annual gain due to reduction in power purchase (INR crores) : 11443

Loss of sale to agricultural consumers (INR crores) : 1400

Annual gain due to reduction in subsidy from state govts. (INR crores) : 4200

Total annual gain to Discoms and state govts. (INR crores) : 14200

Simple payback period (Years) : 2.5


Hybrid business model

Electricity sales interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

Utility / Discom

Consumers

  • Annual payment from Special DSM fund to support capital expenditure

  • Sharing of savings to support operating expenses

  • Improved Collection efficiency

  • Reduced Losses and Peak Load

  • Sale of saved energy to other consumers

Government / Regulatory Commission

  • Reduction in Subsidy payments

  • Policy Guidelines and Approvals

  • Inclusion in Annual Revenue Requirement

Policy guidelines & Approvals

Payment Security Package

Regulator

Monitoring Agency

Farmer

Third Party Testing

Agreement

ESCO/ Contractor

  • Free Energy Efficient Pump sets

  • Reduced Energy Bills

  • Free Maintenance

  • Quality Power Supply

  • Capital investment for Installation of new pumps

  • Design / Installation / Commissioning & R&M

  • Demonstrate the energy savings

  • Repair and Maintenance

Hybrid Business Model


Flow chart of hybrid business model ag dsm solapur
Flow chart of Hybrid business model – Ag DSM interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09 Solapur

Initial Capital Cost

(Rs. 706)

All figures in Rs. lakhs

Annual subsidy reduction of Rs. 53 lakhs

State Govt.

Payment from savings (30% - 71.62 lakhs)

Annual Savings retained (70% - Rs 167 lakhs)

ESCO/Pump Manufacturer

MSEDCL

Annual benefit from savings of 8.8 MU/annum

(Rs. 238.73)

Special DSM fund approved by state commission (Rs.706 lac)

Annual support of 141.24 lakhs

Operating Expenses for 5 years

Avg. annual Interest Payment

(Rs. 28)

Payback – 4 years

Avg Annual R&M

(Rs. 34.60)


Municipal dsm
Municipal DSM interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

  • Over 150 Mu DSM projects prepared; ESCO contracting underway

  • DPRs for over 85 ULBs prepared

  • Online monitoring system for DPRs put in place

  • Awareness and capacity building of municipalities initiated


Market transformation driven dsm
Market Transformation driven DSM interventions during the financial year 2007-08 & 2008-09

  • Lighting DSM

    • Reducing cost of efficient light

    • Awareness/ facilitation

  • Standards and Labelling

    • Mandating standards

    • Awareness/ outreach

  • Commercial Buildings

    • New codes for commercial buildings

    • Development of ESCO market for existing buildings

  • Agriculture DSM

    • Replacement of inefficient pumpsets with star-rated on PPP mode

  • Municipal DSM

    • Replacement of pumpsets with star rated on PPP mode

    • Replacement of street lighting on PPP mode

  • PAT Scheme

    • Issue of ESCerts

  • CDM

    • Programmatic approach

    • Issue of CERs


Energy savings during 2008 09 independent agency verification
Energy Savings during 2008-09 Independent Agency verification

Total for 2007-08 and 2008-09 : 2128 MW



Background verification

  • FOR in its meeting held on 15th January, 2010 gave in-principle go-ahead to BEE to prepare a detailed implementation plan for RMSDP

  • National Mission for Enhanced Energy Efficiency (NMEEE) calls for measures to accelerate the shift to energy efficient appliances in designated sectors through innovative measures to make the products more affordable by way of Market Transformation for Energy Efficiency (MTEE)

  • International effort for coordinated national activities underway – Super Efficient Appliances Deployment (SEAD) programme

  • A similar concept for promoting LED lights have been approved by National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council (NMCC) on 19.5.2010


Background - Consultations verification

  • BEE, in consultation with LBNL and PRAYAS Energy Group has prepared the detailed implementation plan

  • The issue of aggregating demand to promote super efficient ACs was discussed with the Room Airconditioners Manufacturing Association (RAMA) in May, 2010 – in-principle agreement of concept

  • In case of LEDs, detailed discussions with ELCOMA and other LED manufacturers have yielded positive results

  • RMSDP concept presented to Joint Secretary, MOP during the EE Global meeting in Washington DC on 10th May, 2010- appreciation and support from several governments

  • SEAD is an approved Task of IPEEC, with India as one of the participants.


Key objectives of RMSDP verification

  • Promote long term utility based DSM.

  • Reduce transaction costs by bundling future demand across several states/ regions - higher demand to stimulate reduction in prices - necessary to sustain the market in the long run.

  • Enhance the ease of administering the programme - simpler and more robust evaluation and monitoring, leading to greater transparency and accountability.

  • Enable design and deployment of appliances that are better suited to Indian conditions and accelerated adoption of superior technology.

  • Facilitate better coordination with the Standards and Labeling program and allow rapid ratcheting-up of energy performance standards.

  • Significantly accelerate the pace of market penetration of super efficient appliances in the market.

  • Enable India to take leadership position in designing, developing and implementing such a programme – eg. SEAD


Possible Impact Of RMSDP verification

Could help save 38-40% of household energy consumption


RMSDP – 3 different interventions verification

  • I.Incentives for SEE

  • The incremental cost of SEE is within reasonable limit as compared to normal equipment.

  • The Standards and Labeling programme of BEE has initiated market

  • II. Direct Procurement by Utility

  • The incremental cost of SEE is many times higher that a similar in-efficient equipment (like LEDs vis-à-vis the incandescent bulbs).

  • The technical standards are in an evolutionary stage and the testing facilities are not adequate.

  • III. Project Based SEE Deployment

  • Encourage project development by utilities to promote DSM under a regulatory oversight

  • Provide a suitable payment security mechanism by leveraging the regulatory charge to encourage ESCOs.


Key barriers for promoting sees
Key barriers for promoting SEEs verification

  • High initial cost of SEEs

    • The cost of SEE is likely to be high- penetration in price sensitive market an issue – offtake of 5 STAR products is low as compared to others

    • Lack of availability of information – as in Standards and Labeling Programme – need a SEE Label

  • Lack of motivation amongst manufacturers

    • Manufacturers hesitant to introduce SEEs – lack of demand, and of willingness of consumers to pay

    • S&L Programme provides a time- table for achieving higher efficiencies – no incentive to accelerate the process


Leveraging energy savings
Leveraging energy savings verification

Labeling of ‘super-efficient’ equipments (SEE)

Determination of incentives based on peak load reduction

Monitoring sale of SEE, verification and incentive payout


Financing dsm ee initiatives
Financing DSM EE initiatives verification

  • Due to barriers such as untested outcomes, lack of clarity about baseline data and M & V protocol, lack of financing and huge demand – supply gap, DSM has not taken off.

  • While costs associated with DSM projects are usually insignificant; due to poor cash situation, utilities are finding it difficult to arrange necessary funding.

  • Following four major sources of finance are usually available to utilities:

    • Self Financing or Recovery of Cost through ARR;

    • Development of Special Funds;

    • Grants from Government Agencies;

    • International Financial Institutions / development agencies


Possible regulatory incentives
Possible regulatory incentives verification

  • SERC may make suitable provisions in the Tariff Regulations to include DSM expenditure in the Annual Revenue Requirement and recover the same through tariffs.

  • SERC may develop suitable incentive mechanism for utility to earn additional return on equity for procurement of DSM Resources in place of supply side resources. Such incentive could be in the form of additional ROE (say 1%) for DSM/EE in subsidised categories like residential, municipal, agriculture, etc.

  • Higher incremental return on equity (say 2%) be provided to utility for investments in DSM programs in subsidizing categories like Commercial and Industrial Sector.


Possible regulatory incentives … verificationcontd

  • Alternative incentive mechanism in the form of savings in costly power purchase may be developed where it is possible to identify costly power purchase.

  • Utilities may be encouraged to develop peak load saving programs so that overall power purchase cost decreases. Utilities may be allowed to retain percentage of such saving.

  • Utilities may be encouraged to create their own Energy Service Companies (ESCO) as an unregulated activity and capture the business opportunities by implementation of DSM and EE projects in their licensed areas.

  • Utilities may be encouraged to design DSM/EE schemes where benefits are large enough to allow sharing of benefits as a way to reduce utility risk.


Building blocks incentive and procurement interventions
Building Blocks – Incentive and Procurement Interventions verification

  • In-principle approval of FOR – under consideration

  • Approval of funds required from GOI – under consideration

  • Selection of Equipments – to be taken up by BEE after FOR and GOI approvals

  • Technical specifications of Selected Equipments – Technical Committees to be formed for selected equipment having stakeholder participation

  • Calculating the amount to be recovered from ARR of utilities – to be taken up for each selected equipment based on the technical specifications decided by BEE – incentive or procurement price to be decided based on competitive bidding of aggregated demand by EESL – with adequate safeguards to ensure proper price discovery - draft bidding documents prepared


Building blocks incentive and procurement interventions1
Building Blocks – Incentive and Procurement Interventions verification

  • Monitoring of RMSDP – EESL to monitor the sales of SEE in each of the participating state on behalf of FOR/ ERCs/ BEE –necessary draft contracts between EESL and the manufacturers prepared

  • Payment of Incentives/Procurement Costs – Based on the monitoring of sales of SEEs, EESL to propose payment of incentive (or cost)

  • State Specific Regulatory Approval - to be taken up on behalf of Utilities of participating states by EESL

  • Evaluation and Impact Analysis – Through an independent agency


Project based see deployment
Project based SEE deployment verification

  • Energy savings by EE project captured under regulatory oversight

  • Expenditure on project development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation to be allowed as pass through in ARR

  • Fixed annual payout to ESCO based on performance during the project lifecycle

  • Sharing of savings with Utility


Way forward
Way forward verification

  • National Steering Committee to be constituted under DG, BEE with participation from all States participating in the programme. The NSC would be the overall coordinating body for the programme- EESL to provide the Secretariat services to the NSC

  • Technical Committee for two equipments (Fans and ACs) be constituted – with participation from all manufacturers, test labs, SDAs, other stakeholders – give recommendations for technical specification and label for SEE in a time bound manner – within 6 months

  • BEE to move the MOP for seeking approval of the financial resources required for the programme


Thank you verification

Visit us at:

www.bee.gov.in

www.bee-india.nic.in


ad