html5-img
1 / 9

Proposal for faculty mentoring

Proposal for faculty mentoring. Academic Enterprise July 2011. Motivating factors. All junior faculty members would benefit from formal mentoring process A uniform approach does not exist Variable approaches Variable benefit Inconsistent communication

tad
Download Presentation

Proposal for faculty mentoring

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Proposal for faculty mentoring Academic Enterprise July 2011

  2. Motivating factors • All junior faculty members would benefit from formal mentoring process • A uniform approach does not exist • Variable approaches • Variable benefit • Inconsistent communication • Only a minority of faculty benefit from existing programs • APEL, PCAT, CHRCDA etc… • And often not early enough in their careers

  3. Approach taken • Several preliminary meetings • J. Carey, N. Dudley, F. Filloux, T.Westbrook, J. Bernard, B.Harman • Brainstorming • Recent meeting with other leaders: • J. Bale, W. Hobson of APEL • C. Byington, PCAT • current APEL scholars

  4. Recommendations • Establish formal mentoring process • Group meetings • Communication of information • Peer mentoring and collaboration • Individual “career mentor” • Identify upon hiring (in offer letter) • Establish standard expectations • Minimum number of meetings • Timing • Content • Availability (5-7% FTE)

  5. “Career mentor” • Distinct from research mentor • Identified upon hire • Has some requisite (mentoring) skills • Advises on: • Career choices • RPT process and expectations • Resources available • Leadership opportunities/conflict resolution • General life concerns; balancing career & personal life • Etc…

  6. Core skills required • Understanding of Department and University policies • RPT process • Understanding of appropriate career trajectory and milestones for trainee • Clinical • Research • Education • Administration • Communication skills • Active listening • Reframing • Conflict management • Providing constructive (actionable) feedback • Understanding and working across gender/generation/cultural differences • Strategic/Career planning • Network building • Work/Life balance • How to Motivate others • Mentor Responsibilities/Behaviors to avoid/Boundaries

  7. Specific proposal • Institute this process for all newly hired (junior) faculty asap • Identify core group of career mentors • Must be committed (5-7% FTE) • Have some mentoring experience/skills • Diverse backgrounds • Clinical,research; subspecialty, generalist etc… • Provide for further training of mentors in future • Develop a cadre of skilled career mentors

  8. Primary directive for now 1 • Each Division chief to identify one or several potential career mentors • Provide time for mentorship • Discuss importance and goals of career mentorship in Division meetings • Discuss importance of career mentorship with newly hired faculty 1. Assuming we agree with this proposal

More Related