1 / 49

Housing & Economic Development in the Commonwealth

Housing & Economic Development in the Commonwealth. Kirk Sykes President, Urban Strategies for America Fund Barry Bluestone Dean, School of Social Science, Urban Affairs, and Public Policy, Northeastern University Ted Carman

Download Presentation

Housing & Economic Development in the Commonwealth

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Housing & Economic Development in the Commonwealth Kirk Sykes President, Urban Strategies for America Fund Barry Bluestone Dean, School of Social Science, Urban Affairs, and Public Policy, Northeastern University Ted Carman President, Concord Square Development Corporation Progressive Business Leaders Network October 26, 2007

  2. The Economic State of the Commonwealth

  3. Economic Activity Index: Massachusetts vs. U.S. (1993-2007) January 1993 – October 2001 Leading the Nation October 2001 – June 2007 Lagging the Nation

  4. Employment in Massachusetts Total Massachusetts Non-Farm Employment

  5. Change in Total Non-Farm Employment (Seasonally Adjusted) (January 2001 - August 2007)

  6. Population Trends • Between 2000 and 2006, the population of Massachusetts increased by only 74,000(1.2%) – the slowest increase in New England. • Since 2000, Massachusetts has suffered a net domestic out-migration of over 280,000 residents. • This outflow of people has been softened only somewhat by the arrival of about 186,000 foreign immigrants.

  7. U.S. Bureau of the Census

  8. Population Trends in New England

  9. Immigration & Net Domestic Migration

  10. Who’s Leaving Massachusetts?

  11. Where did they go?

  12. Stagnant Incomes/Rising Poverty in Greater Boston

  13. Slow Growth … But Housing Costs Remain High Median Price of Single Family Homes and Condominiums 2005-2007: -6% 2000-2005: +61% 1995-2005: +156%

  14. Effective Rents – Rising Again 2005 - 1Q 2007: +6% 2000 - 2005: +1% 1995 - 2005: +58%

  15. (Un)Affordable Communities in Greater Boston • In 2007, only 6 communities out of 161 in Greater Boston – Bellingham, Blackstone, Bolton, Southborough, Stow, and Townsend – are affordable for a typical first-time homebuyer in 2007 • Back in 1998, affordable housing was available in 116 Greater Boston communities

  16. Number of Affordable Communities Summary of Affordability Gap Analysis

  17. Housing Affordability in Greater Boston

  18. Housing Production in Greater Boston Needed Production: 18,000 Units/Year Single Family v. Multifamily Building Permits in Greater Boston

  19. Housing Costs and Economic Development

  20. Boston Family Budget – 4 Persons Among 304 U.S. Metropolitan Areas • Housing Costs: 7th Highest MSA • Child Care: 7th Highest MSA • Health Care: 7th Highest MSA • Personal Care: 6th Highest MSA • Fed/State Tax: 2nd Highest MSA • Total Cost: 1st Highest MSA Economic Policy Institute, Family Budget Calculator, 2005

  21. Top Decile: Metro Area Cost of Living Boston $ 64,656 Washington (D.C. portion) $ 61,440 Nassau-Suffolk, NY $ 60,780 Stamford-Norwalk, CN $ 60,720 Lawrence (Mass. portion)$ 59,280 New York, NY $ 58,656 Barnstable-Yarmouth, MA$ 58,236 San Francisco, CA $ 57,624 Worcester (Mass. portion)$ 55,704 Springfield, MA$ 55,320 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN $ 54,948 Nashua, NH $ 54,852 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA $ 53,808 Oakland, CA $ 53,412 San Jose, CA $ 52,800 Pittsfield, MA$ 52,632 Rochester, MN $ 51,288 Monmouth-Ocean, NJ $ 50,736 San Diego, CA $ 50,088 Newark, NJ $ 49,992 New Haven-Meriden, CN $ 49,848 Honolulu, HI $ 49,824 Philadelphia (Pa. portion) $ 49,716 Boulder-Longmont, CO $ 49,596 Bridgeport, CN $ 49,272 Manchester, NH $ 49,152 Santa Rosa, CA $ 48,924 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY $ 48,900 Hartford, CN $ 48,684 Trenton, NJ $ 48,576 Rochester, NY $ 48,540 Universe: 304 U.S. Metro Areas Economic Policy Institute: Family Budget Calculator

  22. Boston Monthly Housing $1,266 Monthly Food $ 587 Monthly Child Care $1,298 Monthly Transportation $ 321 Monthly Health Care $ 592 Monthly Other Necessity $ 500 Monthly Taxes $ 824 Monthly Total $5,388 Annual Total $64,656 Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill Monthly Housing $ 779 Monthly Food $ 587 Monthly Child Care $ 866 Monthly Transportation $ 358 Monthly Health Care $ 368 Monthly Other Necessity $ 369 Monthly Taxes $ 350 Monthly Total $3,677 Annual Total $44,124 A Tale of Two CitiesBasic Budget2 Parents, 2 Children A Tale of Two Cities Source: Economic Policy Institute, “Family Budget Calculator, 2005”

  23. 2.91% 2.29% 1.49% 1.53% 0.95% 0.86% 0.68% 0.12% -0.62% -0.68% Low Price High Price Universe: 245 U.S. Metro Areas Economic Policy Institute, “Family Budget Calculator, 2005”; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

  24. 2.53% 1.98% 1.09% 1.06% 0.84% 0.93% 0.62% 0.50% -0.02% -0.21% Low Cost High Cost Universe: 245 U.S. Metro Areas Economic Policy Institute, “Family Budget Calculator, 2005”; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

  25. Boston MSA (-5.2%) Universe: 304 U.S. Metro Areas Economic Policy Institute, “Family Budget Calculator, 2005”; U.S. Bureau of the Census

  26. 2.19% 1.54% 1.40% 1.04% 0.60% 0.41% 0.39% 0.16% 0.19% -2.12% Universe: 304 U.S. Metro Areas Boston Economic Policy Institute, “Family Budget Calculator, 2005”; U.S. Bureau of the Census

  27. Key Point • Housing Costs – and more generally the cost of living – is a key economic challenge in the Commonwealth … and perhaps the #1 barrier to a full economic recovery

  28. Progress on the Housing Front: Chapter 40R/40S ADD SLIDES FROM TED CARMAN

  29. Chapter 40R/40S • As of July 2007, 16 communities in Massachusetts towns have approved Chapter 40R “Smart Growth” districts. More than 30 others are considering such districts. • Existing 40R Districts can provide over 5,800 new units of housing • Over 3,000 more units in the pipeline

  30. Amesbury Brockton Chelsea Dartmouth Grafton Haverhill Kingston Lakeville Lunenburg Lynnfield Natick North Andover North Reading Northampton Norwood Plymouth Total: 5,813 Units Chapter 40R Communities

  31. Meeting New Paradigm Targets Estimated 2007 Production Percent of Target: 55%

  32. Conclusions • The “Perfect Storm” – Anxious homeowners, declining production … but no improvement in affordability • The weak economy is linked to the continuing housing crisis • We still have a lot to do to get us back on track toward economic prosperity equitably shared

  33. Finding Solutions

  34. A Model of Social Change (Annual Greater Boston Housing Report Card) (Housing Challenge) (CHTF) (Chapter 40R/40S)

  35. The Nature of the Problem • With housing – Two Americas • The Midwest, the South, the Southwest. • The East Coast and the West Coast • Therefore – the problems are not inevitable

  36. The Culprits • Zoning • Multiple Academic Studies • Govt. Regulations • Shortage of Land for building • Increases land costs • Extensive permitting delays

  37. Local and State Finance • Perverse Interaction • Prop. 2 ½ • Property Taxes • Chapter 70

  38. Single Family Home • Sale price - $400,000 • Property taxes at .15 = $6,000 • Half for school costs = $3,000 • On average – 1 school child • Actual cost of education: $10,000

  39. A New House • Local Costs: • Loss of Open Space • Increase in traffic • More public services • Education • State Benefits • Sales Tax • Income Tax • Corporate Tax

  40. It’s no Surprise • Local communities do all they can to discourage the production of housing. • They are remarkably successful • The economy shows the results

  41. Smart Growth Zoning • Chapters 40R and 40S • Goal: a surplus of zoned land • Incentives if: • Smart Growth Locations • 20% of units affordable • Minimum Densities

  42. Incentives • Initial Payment - $1,000 per unit • Construction Payment - $3,000 / Unit • School Cost Hold Harmless • Design Standards

  43. How has it worked? • Zoned land for 6,000 units • 3,000 more in the pipeline • Diverse developments and communities • 17 of 17 communities have approved • A cooperative dynamic • But, all multifamily. • Starter Homes still not being built

  44. Starter Homes • Credible long term funding for school costs. • Additional incentives. • Proposal in the works.

  45. Public Policy Ingredients • A good idea • Institutional Support • Significant Funding • Intense effort • Broad and deep process

  46. How Did it Happen? 18 months from concept paper to legislation • The Commonwealth Housing Task Force • The Center for Urban and Regional Policy • The Boston Foundation • The Legislature and Administration

  47. Conclusion • Much Success, but, more to be done. • The Process can be replicated.

More Related