1 / 13

Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

Readiness of A5 Countries for MB Phase-out by 1st Jan 2015: Addressing the challenges of sustainability Webinar on Methyl Bromide 7th May, 2013 Email: Florence.Asher @unep.org. Methyl Bromide Phase-Out Schedule as agreed by Parties in 1997.

sydnee
Download Presentation

Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Readiness of A5 Countries for MB Phase-out by 1st Jan 2015: Addressing the challenges of sustainability Webinar on Methyl Bromide7th May, 2013Email: Florence.Asher @unep.org Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

  2. Methyl Bromide Phase-Out Schedule as agreed by Parties in 1997 Critical and emergency uses may be permitted after phase-out if they meet agreed criteria. Quarantine and pre-shipment (QPS) uses and feedstock are exempt from reductions and phase-out Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

  3. Four Main Categories of MB uses under the Montreal Protocol Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

  4. Global Context • Methyl Bromide Phase-out schedule for developing countries is 1st January 2015; • Several countries have accelerated their methyl bromide phase-out ahead of the deadline; • Methyl bromide is the only sector where the reversibility of ODS use is possible and nearly effortless.; • Compared to the industrial sector, their sustainability is less guaranteed; • Unlike CFCs and halons, methyl bromide production facilities will not close down; they will continue for Critical Use Exemptions and Quarantine and Pre-Shipment (QPS); & • Production and imports for QPS use could easily be diverted to non-QPS uses. Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

  5. MB Consumption trends in Article 5 countries 1991–2011 Year Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

  6. Baselines and trends in MB consumption in Non-A 5 and A 5 regions, 1990 – 2011 (ODP tonnes) Year Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

  7. MB QPS trends in Article 5 countries 1991–2011 Year Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

  8. MB QPS trends in Non-A 5 and A 5 regions, 1990 – 2011 (ODP tonnes) Year Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

  9. Key issues • Technical Sustainability Issues of Alternative Technologies • Alternative technologies/chemicals including issues related to efficacy of alternatives, pest resistance to the alternatives, emerging new pests, cost of alternatives, commercial availability of alternatives in smaller countries, bans on certain chemical alternatives, difficulty in the registration of new chemicals, unsuitable infrastructure for some alternatives such as phosphine, and lack of cost effective alternatives for high moisture fresh dates. • Training needs including issues related to emergence of new farmers since the completion of MB projects, lack of knowledge and capacity on application of new chemicals and new technologies, especially for countries that did not report use of MB , lack of knowledge in making on-farm alternative materials, lack of networking on sourcing of alternative materials, and lack of ongoing awareness programs. There is also need for capacity building of Customs Officers on MB • Experts/expertise and technology to monitor the development of pest resistance. Lack of appropriate experts to carry out monitoring activities and to collaborate with partners. These experts/ expertise are very scarce. Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

  10. Key issues contd. • 2. Technical Assistance Issues • Awareness raising - Continuous Awareness raising, access of new developments for old and new market players and building confidence in acceptance of new technologies, raising awareness on risk of reversibility to MB uses and encouraging policy and/or awareness measures to avoid it happening. • Training Programs - Development and maintenance of a sustainable practical training program and coordinated efforts to transfer the alternative technologies. Training of Ozone Officers on available alternatives to QPS uses and alternatives for treating wood pallets (ISPM-15). • Documentation - Development and updating of technical manuals, toolkits, etc on new technologies. • Technology Transfer Programs -Lack of Exchange Programms/ study tour to countries with advanced technologies for information exchange, materials, varieties, rootstocks etc • Guidance and assistance to Ozone Officers on MB reporting requirements, Clarification on Procedures for application of Critical Uses Nominations and QPS application of methyl bromide (MOP Dec XXIII/5), and handling of identified unwanted MB cylinders as well as waste by-products materials from MB alternatives Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

  11. Key issues contd. • Regulatory and Institutional Issues • Continued availability of MB because of continued production of MB for exempted QPS uses: Production and imports for QPS use could easily be diverted to non-QPS, risk of illegal markets for MB, increased demand of MB for QPS in some countries. Reversibility of MB use is quite possible and nearly effortless. Compared to the industrial sectors, the sustainability of the MB phase out is less guaranteed by changing the equipment used but rather depends on the availability of cost-effective technically, economically and commercially (TEC) feasible alternatives, since there is no single replacement. Such alternatives have not yet reached all countries and all regions. • Lack of proper tracking systems and institutional coordination (NOUs and Agricultural Ministries) for efficient licensing and control of illegal trade • National regulatory restrictions that limit uses of the alternatives, and lack of incentives to adopt clean technologies • Lack of market-access pressure as driving forces of good agricultural practices • Lack of Partners for co- funding Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

  12. Highlights of CAP’s response to the challenges • Trainings on alternative technologies, Information dissemination, Documentations, etc Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

  13. Thank you Regional Office for Africa, Montreal Protocol Compliance Assistance Programme

More Related