1 / 29

IRU IT risk management tools and their use by the ECO Member States

IRU IT risk management tools and their use by the ECO Member States. Karachi, 18 August 2014. Tatiana Rey-Bellet, TIR-EPD Project Manager. Computerisation of TIR System by IRU. Customs authorities. TIR c arnet holders. TIR associations. Real-Time SafeTIR : objectives.

sydnee-moses
Download Presentation

IRU IT risk management tools and their use by the ECO Member States

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IRU IT risk management tools and their use by the ECO Member States Karachi, 18 August 2014 • Tatiana Rey-Bellet, TIR-EPD Project Manager

  2. Computerisation of TIR System by IRU Customs authorities TIR carnet holders TIR associations

  3. Real-Time SafeTIR: objectives Automation of SafeTIR procedures: • TIR Carnet status control • Instant transmission of SafeTIR data • SafeTIR data reconciliation Simplification and higher safety of customs procedures for the facilitation of international trade • Starting from 1990s: geopolitical changeswith high increase in trade volumes and in TIR transport risk increase for TIR guarantee chain. • October 1995:Administrative Committee for the TIR Convention adopted a Recommendation which set out an electronic control system for TIR Carnets. • August 2006: this control system – SafeTIR, was included in the TIR Convention as Annex 10.

  4. RTS – geographic coverage 18RTS countries • Azerbaijan • Belgium • Bosnia and Herzegovina • Bulgaria • Georgia • Kyrgyzstan • Kazakhstan • Latvia • Macedonia • Moldova • Morocco • Russia • Serbia • Turkey • Ukraine • Uzbekistan • Finland • France In implementation: Belarus Iran Next priorities: Turkmenistan Tajikistan F I N L A N D N O R W A Y S W E D E N E S T O N I A R U S S I A N F E D E R A T I O N D E N M A R K L A T V I A L I T H U A N I A Russian Fed. U N I T E D I R E L A N D B E L A R U S P O L A N D K I N G D O M NETHERLANDS G E R M A N Y B E L G I U M L U X . C Z E C H R E P U B L I C U K R A I N E K A Z A K H S T A N S L O V A K I A F R A N C E A U S T R I A M O L D O V A H U N G A R Y S W I T Z E R L A N D R O M A N I A SLOVENIA C R O A T I A SERBIA BOSNIA- HERZEGOVINA B U L G A R I A G E O R G I A K I R G I S T A N I T A L Y MKD ALBANIA S P A I N U Z B E K I S T A N ARMENIA A Z E R B A I J A N T U R K M E N I S T A N P E O P L E ‘ SR E P U B L I C O F C H I N A A Z E R B. PORTUGAL T U R K E Y G R E E C E T A J I K I S T A N S Y R I A N A F G H A N I S T A N I R A N A R A B CYPRUS R E P U B L I C L E B A N O N T U N I S I A M O R O C C O I S R A E L J O R D A N

  5. SafeTIR: global figures 2011 64% of SafeTIR data were transmitted within 24 hours Average data transmission period – 4.4 days 2012 81%of SafeTIR data were transmitted within 24 hours Average data transmission period – 1.4days 2013 83% of SafeTIR data were transmitted within 24 hours Average data transmission period – 1.6 days Annex 10 to TIR Convention: 100% of SafeTIR data must be sent within 24 hours ECO 54% 8.7days Global for 58 countries 77% 2.1days

  6. RTS in ECO countries Negotiation stage: Tajikistan Turkmenistan RTS countries

  7. Reconciliation Procedure

  8. CUTE-Wise Implications of SafeTIR for the TIR Holder ≠ Reconciliation Procedure

  9. RTS Reconciliationautomation -part of RTS module Customs automatically daily retrieve list of reconciliation requests from IRU database Benefits of SafeTIR data reconciliation automation module: • Improve the quality and completeness of SafeTIR data • No need of paper exchange • Higher reply efficiency IRU database Customs database • Customs send replies to IRU for requests of type: • Missing (no data in IRU, but TIR Carnet is terminated) • Customs queries (customs transmitted data, but • mismatch with data in TIR Carnet)

  10. SafeTIR System: Real Time • Real Time objective : • Transmission: 100% in 24 hours • Reconciliation: 100% of response in 24 hours Efficient risk detection

  11. IRU TIR-EPD - a tool for submittingadvance information on goods • Mandatory submission of electronic advance information in European Union since 2009 • Mandatory submission of electronic advance information in the Customs Union (Belarus/Russia/Kazakhstan) since 2012 • Mandatory submission of electronic information in Ukraine since 2013 • Mandatory submission of electronic advance information in Iran (Bazargan) since 2014 • Submission of advance information in countries, where it is not mandatory, facilitates and secures border crossing TIR- EPD satisfies the requirements of all Customs Authorities, connected to TIR-EPD

  12. IRU TIR-EPD: Concept

  13. TIR-EPDvs TIR Carnet • Data received by customs: • HS codes • Goods description • Weight • Package type and quantity • Itinerary • Vehicle details • Driver’s details • Cost of goods • Etc. TIR-EPD = TIR Carnet + additional information (in compliance with all national requirements)

  14. TIR-EPD – advantages for Customs

  15. TIR-EPD –advantages for transport operators

  16. New version of IRU TIR-EPD: from 15 April 2013 https://tirepd.iru.org

  17. TIR-EPD: geographic scope In final implementation stage: Iran Greece Italy Kyrgyzstan • 27 TIR-EPDcountries present: • - 96% of all issued TIR Carnets • - 91% of all TIR terminations F I N L A N D N O R W A Y S W E D E N E S T O N I A R U S S I A N F E D E R A T I O N D E N M A R K L A T V I A L I T H U A N I A Russian Fed. U N I T E D I R E L A N D B E L A R U S P O L A N D K I N G D O M NETHERLANDS G E R M A N Y B E L G I U M L U X . C Z E C H R E P U B L I C U K R A I N E K A Z A K H S T A N S L O V A K I A F R A N C E A U S T R I A M O L D O V A H U N G A R Y S W I T Z E R L A N D R O M A N I A SLOVENIA C R O A T I A SERBIA BOSNIA- HERZEGOVINA SERBIA B U L G A R I A G E O R G I A K I R G I S T A N I T A L Y MKD ALBANIA S P A I N U Z B E K I S T A N ARMENIA A Z E R B A I J A N T U R K M E N I S T A N P E O P L E ‘ SR E P U B L I C O F C H I N A A Z E R B. PORTUGAL T U R K E Y G R E E C E T A J I K I S T A N S Y R I A N A F G H A N I S T A N I R A N A R A B CYPRUS R E P U B L I C L E B A N O N T U N I S I A M O R O C C O I S R A E L J O R D A N

  18. TIR-EPD in ECO countries Negotiation stage: Tajikistan Turkmenistan TIR-EPD countries

  19. TIR-EPD: potential for Pakistani Holders • Pakistan – Afghanistan – Iran – Turkey = 4 TIR-EPDs • Reduces time • Saves money • Reduces corruption 4 3 2 1

  20. TIR-EPD growth Средний месячный рост: 9% Подача в неделю: > 17,000 1/5 of all TIR-EPDs was sent by transport operators from ECO in 2014 (with Turkish and Iranian Holders leading)

  21. TIR-EPDas basis for compete computerisation of TIR procedures • The following message exchange covers the whole TIR operations • Declaration data from transport operator to customs (EPD015); • Reception acknowledgement (EPD928) • Acceptance notification MRN allocated (EPD028); • Release for transit (EPD029); • No release for transit (EPD051); • Cancellation decision (EPD009); • Declaration data rejected (EPD016) • Control decision notification (EPD060) – optional; • Goods release notification (EPD025) • Write-off notification (EPD045)

  22. Example of TIR-EPD data exchange Customs of destination Customs of entry Customs system IRU TIR Holder • TIR Holder sens advance information to customs (EPD015) • Customs acknowledges data receipt (EPD928) • Customs allocated MRN number (EPD028) • Risk analysis and control decision!

  23. Example of TIR-EPD data exchange Customs of destination Customs of entry Customs system IRU • Electronic data are available at the customs of destination • TIR Holder presents the documents to the customs officer at destination • Customs checks validity of TIR Carnet (through RTS) • Customs transmit data on TIR operation termination to IRU (through RTS) • Customs transmits data on discharge of TIR operation to IRU (EPD045)

  24. Implementation of TIR-EPD Green Lanes with Green lanes without Green lanes • TIR-EPD Green lanes • Enhanced use of advance cargo information and risk management • Selectivity of customs controls (reduced controls for reliable transports) • Better transit capacity

  25. TIR EPD Green Lane in Kapıkule, Turkey From 1 November 2012 Data keying decreased from 5-6 min to 2-3 min: ~50% time saved Implementation cost: EUR 1000

  26. TIR-EPD Green Lanes in 6 easysteps • Dedicate one (or more) lane as fast track • Mark the lane and approach to it • Ensure selection of trucks at the entry through TIR-EPD and Risk Profile • Divert selected trucks to dedicated lane • Automate and minimise formalities at the fast track lane • Carry out only random examination whenever considered necessary TIR-EPD can be combined with other facilitation criteria Moldova: Green Lanes for TIR-EPD and Authorised Economic Operators Macedonia, Serbia (at negotiation stage): Green Lanes for TIR-EPD/transport with International Vehicle Weight Certificate and empty trucks

  27. Green Lanes with TIR-EPD: scope for Pakistan • Transition to international harmonised good practices, which imply: • Advance risk assessment • Green Lanes with TIR-EPD and other selected criteria, resulting in effective organisation of transit flow • Single Window System First priority - BCP with bottlenecks: • Torkham (also open for TIR from Afghan side) • Chaman (Spin Buldak (Kandahar) from Afghan side) • Positive impact: • Better risk management and enhanced safety and security • Enhanced transit capacity

  28. TIR-EPD: scope for RORO transport

More Related