Group 4
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 15

Group 4 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 65 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Group 4. Members: Irene - DOD Marystella - FHI Winnie - EGPAF Steven - ITECH Tom – CDC. To do. Review conclusions and recommendations and confirm if all activities have been captured in draft implementation plan. How should the proposed functions be implemented? Serially or concurrently.

Download Presentation

Group 4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Group 4

Group 4

Members:

Irene - DOD

Marystella - FHI

Winnie - EGPAF

Steven - ITECH

Tom – CDC


To do

To do

  • Review conclusions and recommendations and confirm if all activities have been captured in draft implementation plan.

  • How should the proposed functions be implemented? Serially or concurrently.

  • Suggest implementation timeline starting Jan 2010.

  • ID lead agencies to take up responsibilities for proposed activities.

  • Challenges that may hamper implementation of any of the activities

  • Additional comments


Situation analysis for emr

Situation analysis for EMR

  • Inventory – completed

  • Mapping – completed.

  • Summary of basic specs – completed.

  • Drafting basic specs – lead agencies NASCOP/HMIS/HS20/20/I-TECH – Jan 2010

  • Facilitate a workshop and finalize report – can be done concurrently Feb 2010 - NASCOP/HMIS/HS20/20/I-TECH


Upgrade of emr s w h w hrm clinical care processes

Upgrade of EMR S/W, H/W, HRM, Clinical Care Processes

  • Analysis and development of plan for upgrade/new installation if necessary of existing ART/EMR – Start in Mar 2010 – NASCOP/HMIS/I-TECH/TWG.

  • Facilitate a w/shop to review upgrade plan – Mar-Apr 2010 – NASCOP/HMIS/ITECH/HS2020

  • Finalize and submit EMR eval. report… - Apr 2010 – May 2010

  • Facilitate upgrade… - May – Oct 2010 – ITECH/NASCOP/HMIS


Upgrade of emr s w h w hrm clinical care processes1

Upgrade of EMR S/W, H/W, HRM, Clinical Care Processes

  • Facilitate w/shop to review stds – Mar-Apr 2010

  • Facilitate a w/shop to adapt HRM processes… - May – Oct 2010 (due to gaps identified) – NASCOP/HMIS/ITECH/HS2020

    Assumptions and remarks: Due to lack of specific work activities, broad gestimatesesp on time have been made.

    Due to multiple systems, the support mechanisms esp from a central gov agency will have to be thought out very clearly.


Upgrade of emr s w h w hrm clinical care processes2

Upgrade of EMR S/W, H/W, HRM, Clinical Care Processes

  • Facilitate a w/shop to develop mechanism for alignment… - (clinical should be reviewed in concurrence with set EMR stds) – change the activity to read “alignment of EMR stds with GCP or clinical care procedures” – Jan – Feb 2010 – NASCOP/HMIS/KMA/ART-Tech Team

  • Facilitate a w/shop to review HR… - integrated with bullet 5


Strengthening emr coordination

Strengthening EMR Coordination

  • Facilitate TC meetings… - Feb 2010 (should happen before stakeholders meeting)

  • Facilitate a w/shop to draft nat policy… - engage a consultant to draft this policy that should be then be reviewed in a w/shop. – Apr – Jun 2010

  • Facilitate a nat stakeholder w/shop… - Feb 2010 – NASCOP/HMIS/HS2020/ITECH


Strengthening emr coordination1

Strengthening EMR Coordination

  • Est multi-sectoral… - Now! (Nov 2009) – HIS/NASCOP

  • Facilitate a formal… - Jan 2010 (ensure guidelines are ready) – ITECH/NASCOP/HIS/HS2020


Emr readiness for decentralized levels

EMR Readiness for Decentralized Levels

  • Facilitate regional sensitization… - Oct – Nov 2010 – HIS/ITECH/NASCOP

  • Facilitate regional w/shops to develop plans… - Oct – Nov 2010 (should be combined with above)

  • Facilitate annual regional w/shops to review progress… - Oct 2011 – NASCOP/HIS/Partners

  • Facilitate district planning w/shop for change… Oct-Nov 2010 – PASCO/HIS/ITECH/P/DHMT/partners


Emr readiness for decentralized levels1

EMR Readiness for Decentralized Levels

  • Facilitate procurement for EMR as per…- there should be a clearly stated activity for assessment of infrastructure readiness – should start as soon as EMR standards are approved.

  • Facilitate site based planning… - Nov 2010 – HIS/ITECH/p/dHMT/partners

  • Facilitate quarterly district meetings…- integrate into quarterly meetings – dHMTs/partners


Human resource capacity building

Human Resource Capacity Building

  • Evaluation of national training curricula…- Jan 2010, ITECH/HS2020

  • Facilitate a w/shop…-Apr 2010 – MOMS, MOPHS/ITECH/HS2020

  • Develop EMR procedures… - Start May 2010 - Nov 2010 – ITECH/HIS/HS2020

  • Facilitate consultation w/shop…- Nov 2010 – HIS/ITECH/HS2020

  • Finalize and print EMR…- Jan-Feb 2011


Human resource capacity building1

Human Resource Capacity Building

  • Upgrade, pre-test…- Mar 2011 HIS/ITECH

  • Develop user/health…- Jan-Feb 2011 – HIS/ITECH

  • Facilitate consultation w/shop…- Jan-Feb 2011 – HIS/ITECH/HS2020

  • Finalize and print EMR…- Mar-Apr 2011 – HIS/ITECH/NASCOP/HS2020

  • Train TOTs on EMR…- May-Jul 2011 – ITECH/HIS/HS2020


Human resource capacity building2

Human Resource Capacity Building

  • Facilitate refresher training… - after annual progress review 2011 – Nov d/pHMTs/Partners/ITECH/HIS/NASCOP

  • Facilitate quarterly mentorship…- continuous

  • Facilitate EMR initial training – should happen after TOT training in May-Aug 2011

  • Facilitate monthly mentorship…- continuous process


Emr supervision and performance audits

EMR Supervision and Performance Audits

  • Development and pre-test…- should also be integrated into already existing supervisory structures

  • Conduct DHMT/PHMT…-


Challenges

Challenges

  • Time estimation without very clear and specific WBS.

  • Assigning very specific roles and responsibilities – we are doing that now, but there also needs to be a clear coordinating mechanism.

  • Format of the draft implementation plan as categorized by function makes it difficult to plan – should preferably done in MS Project or OWB

  • What should the END DATE be?


  • Login