Designing a vocabulary intervention with the boston public schools
Download
1 / 32

Designing a Vocabulary Intervention with the Boston Public Schools - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 100 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Designing a Vocabulary Intervention with the Boston Public Schools. Strategic Education Research Partnership (SERP) American Educational Research Association Claire White April 10, 2007. Plan. Research Context: pilot schools Assessment data: establishing the need

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha

Download Presentation

Designing a Vocabulary Intervention with the Boston Public Schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Designing a vocabulary intervention with the boston public schools l.jpg
Designing a Vocabulary Intervention with the Boston Public Schools

Strategic Education Research Partnership

(SERP)

American Educational Research Association

Claire White

April 10, 2007


Slide2 l.jpg
Plan Schools

  • Research Context: pilot schools

  • Assessment data: establishing the need

  • Survey data: teacher perspectives

  • Effective vocabulary instruction

  • “Word Generation” intervention

  • Pre-test results

  • Criteria for effective implementation of WG


Steps forward l.jpg
Steps Forward Schools

Pilot WG

Organizational

Survey

Now

WG pre-test

SERP sub-group

develops WG

GRADE

data

Teacher

Survey

Fall, 2005-2006


Pilot schools demographics l.jpg

Westfield Schools

Middle School

80 % Black

16% Hispanic

1.8 White

1.6 Asian

29% Special Education

MCAS

Reilley

Middle School

62% Black

18.1 % Hispanic

9.3% White

8.9 % Asian

25% Special Education

MCAS

Pilot Schools/Demographics



Grade data 6 th grade l.jpg
GRADE data/6 2006 (ELA)th grade

  • Reilley – 6th: 4.4 (mean stanine score)

    • 29% scored at the 3rd stanine or below (more than 1 standard deviation below the national mean)

  • Westfield- – 6th: 3.6 (mean stanine score)

    • 49% scored at the 3rd stanine or below (more than 1 standard deviation below the national mean)


Pilot schools survey data l.jpg
Pilot Schools- Survey data 2006 (ELA)

  • Reilley: high internal accountability;

    strong teacher responsibility for student learning, strong instructional leadership

    2. Westfield: low internal coherence and accountability; weak teacher trust of colleagues and leadership; limited responsibility for student learning and student achievement




Teachers share beliefs about mission l.jpg
Teachers Share 2006 (ELA)Beliefs About Mission


Slide11 l.jpg


Research on vocabulary shows l.jpg
Research on Vocabulary Shows instructional intervention…

  • Poor comprehension outcomes in middle school not necessarily a product of poor word reading but lack of vocabulary and academic language (e.g., Buly & Valencia, 2003; August & Shanahan, 2006)

  • Lack of knowledge of the middle and lower frequency “academic “words encountered in middle and secondary school texts impedes comprehension of those texts (e.g., Stahl & Nagy, 2006; Stanovich, 1986; Carlo, 2005)


Vocabulary instruction in the middle school years l.jpg
Vocabulary Instruction in the Middle School Years instructional intervention

  • must be based on an understanding of the interrelatedness of content-area knowledge and academic language (e.g., Graves, 2006; Scarcella, 2003; Stahl & Nagy, 2006)

  • should occur through oral, reading, and writing activities throughout the content areas

  • should allow deeper explorations of language and should be rooted in text (e.g., Beck et al. 2002)


Challenges to vocabulary instruction l.jpg
Challenges to Vocabulary Instruction instructional intervention

Our initial classroom observations in BPS revealed:

  • Vocabulary is not usually taught

  • Instruction is fragmented between content areas

  • Texts fail to engage adolescents


Word generation program goals l.jpg
Word Generation instructional interventionProgram Goals:

  • Build the vocabulary of middle school students through repeated exposure to high frequency academic words in various contexts;

  • Promote regular use of effective instructional strategies among teachers;

  • Facilitate faculty collaboration on a school-wide effort.


Word generation program features l.jpg
Word Generation instructional interventionProgram Features:

  • Focus on the Academic Word List (AWL);

  • Materials designed for flexible use across the curriculum;

  • An expectation that schools will dedicate at least 10 instructional minutes a day;

  • An opportunity for each school team to design a practical implementation plan that suits its own particular school context.


Word generation materials l.jpg
Word Generation: Materials instructional intervention

  • 20 weeks, each focused on a set of 5 words

  • Controversial topics include: global warming, censorship, dress codes and schools, steroids and sports, junk food and schools, the ethics of cloning, etc.

Monday

Paragraph

introduces

words

Tuesday-Thursday

Content-area

word activities

Friday

Writing with

focus words


Pre launch vocabulary assessments l.jpg
Pre-launch instructional interventionVocabulary Assessments

1. Vocabulary Self-Check (VSC)

  • student gauges his/her own level of knowledge about a word (40 items= 30 WG words and 10 non-words

    2. Multiple Choice (Pre-WG)

  • 30 WG words chosen from 100 WG words to be taught over 20-week intervention

“I do not“I have “I know something “I know it well

know it”heard of it” about it” and can use it.”


Multiple choice pre wg l.jpg
Multiple Choice (Pre-WG) instructional intervention

Sample items

1. She indicated that she was hungry. □ a. denied

□ b. thought

□ c. showed

□. d. indeed

2. He will analyze the information. □ a. ignore

□ b. anchor□ c. remember

□ d. examine



Westfield multiple choice scores l.jpg
Westfield: instructional interventionMultiple Choice Scores

  • Average Performance by Grade

    • 6th 60% correct

    • 7th 67% correct

    • 8th 72% correct

  • Total % Correct across Grades: 66%


Reilley mc means and sd by grade l.jpg
Reilley MC Means and SD by Grade instructional intervention


Reilley multiple choice scores l.jpg
Reilley: Multiple Choice Scores instructional intervention

  • Average Performance by Grade

    • 6th 63% correct

    • 7th 66% correct

    • 8th 66% correct

  • Total % Correct across Grades: 65%


Words known by fewer than 50 of students l.jpg
Words Known by Fewer than 50% of Students instructional intervention


Self report on the same words l.jpg
Self-report on the same words instructional intervention

  • interpret: up to 85% said they knew it well

  • sufficient: up to 74% said they knew it well

  • diverse: up to 86% said they knew it well


Where are we with wg l.jpg
Where are we with WG? instructional intervention

  • Implementing Week 12

  • Collecting and coding writing samples

  • Collecting and coding teacher feedback

  • Gauging effective implementation through various data sources


Criteria for effective implementation of wg l.jpg
Criteria for Effective Implementation of WG instructional intervention

  • Focus on criteria for effective implementation and outcomes at:

    • Student level

    • Teacher level

    • School level


Student level l.jpg
Student Level instructional intervention

  • Effective use of words in natural interactions and weekly writing paragraph

  • Improvement in content-area language and vocabulary

  • Improved performance on post assessments


Teacher level l.jpg
Teacher Level instructional intervention

  • Improved knowledge of effective vocabulary strategies

  • Increased responsibility for teaching content through language and language through content

  • More opportunities provided by teachers for students to use academic language

  • Productive feedback/sharing of concerns through meetings and weekly evaluations on WG materials and activities for revisions


School level l.jpg
School Level instructional intervention

  • Higher level of cohesion and internal accountability (cooperation across the content areas)

  • Greater involvement by principals in disseminating and overseeing intervention

  • Shared commitment by leadership, teachers and students to developing and sustaining a school-wide word culture


Next steps l.jpg
Next steps instructional intervention

  • Continued documentation of effective implementation (classroom observations, interviews, video-recording) and effective instructional practices and word learning

  • Post –survey?

  • Post-assessment(May/June 2007)


Thanks to l.jpg
Thanks to instructional intervention

  • Joanna Christodoulu- Harvard Graduate School of Education

  • Michael Kieffer- Harvard Graduate School of Education

  • Michelle Forman- Harvard Graduate School of Education

  • Jeannette Mancilla-Martinez- Harvard Graduate School of Education

  • Sarah Meacham- SERP

  • Lasse Isakson- Harvard Graduate School of Education

  • Catherine Snow- Harvard Graduate School of Education

  • Jennifer Zeuli- Harvard Graduate School of Education


ad
  • Login