1 / 9

Basic Income: What Do Public Sector Unions Think?

This article explores the views of public sector unions in Canada towards the concept of basic income, including their objections and concerns. It discusses the current labor movement terrain in Canada, unionization rates, and the historical relationship between unions and social democracy. The article also highlights frequently cited objections to basic income from the labor movement.

swayne
Download Presentation

Basic Income: What Do Public Sector Unions Think?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Basic Income: What Do Public Sector Unions Think? Dr. Sid Frankel & Dr. Jim Mulvale Faculty of Social Work University of Manitoba (Canada)

  2. Labour Movement Terrain in Canada Unionization Rates in Canada • Overall 37.6% Men 42.1% Women 31.4% • Overall 28.8% Men 27.2% Women 30.5% Related to changes in labour market: • fewer jobs in industries and occupations with high unionisation rates (e.g. construction and manufacturing) • more jobs in sectors with lower rates (e.g. retail trade and professional services)

  3. Labour Movement Terrain in Canada (cont’d) • Rates falling among men, young workers • From 1999 to 2014: • public sector unionisation rates grew slightly from 70.4% to 71.3% • private sector rates fell from 18.1% to 15.2% • Rates have fallen in all provinces • In 2014, Alberta had the lowest unionisation rate of 20.3%; Quebec and Newfoundland & Labrador, had the highest rates, at almost 36%

  4. Labour Movement Terrain in Canada (cont’d) • Local, provincial, and national levels of organisation of both specific unions and labour central bodies • All public sector unions and most private sector unions are Canadian-based (as opposed to “international”) • Autonomy of organised labour in Quebec

  5. Labour Movement Terrain in Canada (cont’d) • Ongoing trend of amalgamations, especially among private sector unions (e.g. Unifor) • Current split of Unifor (310k members) from CLC • Large public sector unions include: • CUPE – 650k members • NUPGE – 390k (including OPSEU and MGEU) • Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions – 200k • CUPW – 54k

  6. Labour Movement Terrain in Canada (cont’d) • Strong tradition of social (vs. business) unionism in both private and public sector unions • History (especially from the 1920s to the 1940s) of tension and conflict between more radical (Communist) elements and more moderate (social democratic) elements • Formal alliance with NDP since 1961, although instances of strategic support for other parties (usually Liberals)

  7. Cdn Labour Movement’s scepticism / opposition to the idea of guaranteed or basic income • Labour’s strong reaction against the proposal for UISPby the Macdonald Commission in the 1980s • BI proposal by Guy Caron (a union economist before he was a MP) in the 2016-17 federal NDP leadership race • Opposition of CUPE Ontario to the recent (and now cancelled) BI pilot in that province • A question – is there now more openness to the BI model for economic security, especially among a new generation of labour activists and leaders?

  8. Frequently Cited Objections to BI from the Labour Movement • The neo-liberal Trojan Horseobjection • The erosion of existing programmes objection • The low wage subsidy objection • The lay-off of social service workers objection • The undermining collective bargaining objection

  9. OBJECTIONS (Cont’d) • The objection that BI syphons pressure off government for job creation • The objection that basic income (negative income tax) is selective, divisive and stigmatizing • The political feasibility objection – an adequate basic income is unaffordable and an affordable basic income is inadequate • The marketization objection – basic income is a consumerist approach that supports the market rather than reform of the welfare state

More Related