North Sea Oil & Gas – A Scientific overview, the Elgin incident and the Environment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

North sea oil gas a scientific overview the elgin incident and the environment
1 / 47

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

North Sea Oil & Gas – A Scientific overview, the Elgin incident and the Environment. Martin Preston Honorary Research Fellow University of Liverpool. The Environmental Law Enforcement Conference, EDINBURGH 2013. Overview. History of oil and gas spills The tensions in spill management

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

North Sea Oil & Gas – A Scientific overview, the Elgin incident and the Environment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

North sea oil gas a scientific overview the elgin incident and the environment

North Sea Oil & Gas – A Scientific overview, the Elgin incident and the Environment

Martin Preston

Honorary Research Fellow

University of Liverpool

The Environmental Law Enforcement Conference, EDINBURGH 2013



  • History of oil and gas spills

  • The tensions in spill management

  • Why the Gulf of Mexico spill and Elgin gas leak were different

  • Decommissioning in the North Sea

  • The international future – the push to high latitudes and deep waters

What are oil and gas

What are ‘oil’ and ‘gas’?

  • Oil is formed by the heating of reservoirs of plant material over geological times

  • Natural gas – chemically simpler - formation is much the same but involves heating of the material at higher temperatures

  • Crude oil is a very complex mixture of thousands of individual chemicals ranging from gases to tars. No two are identical - fingerprints

  • The `recipe` of crude oils depends on region, oil field specific well and time



  • Oil seeps known for several thousand years – bitumen used to seal boats and containers, fix weapons to shafts, treat skin ailments and wounds and even in the preparation of Egyptian mummies

  • One of the earliest shipments in 1539 when a barrel of crude was shipped from Venezuela to Spain to alleviate the gout of Emperor Charles V*

  • Gas seeps used in Zoroastrian temples

  • First refining by Gessner in 1846 in Nova Scotia produced kerosene. First refinery in Romania in 1856

Anibal Martinez (1969). Chronology of Venezuelan Oil. Purnell and Sons Ltd



  • With the advent of the internal combustion engine demand soared

1 barrel = 160 litres

History european oil traffic

History – European oil traffic

North Sea production supply>demand

Largest tankers

Largest tankers

  • 192816346 GRT and this size maintained until after WW2

  • 1956Suez crisis meant ships needed to traverse Cape of Good Hope so much larger tankers were built

  • 1967Torrey Canyon 120000 DWT

  • 1979 Largest tanker >500000DWT could not transit English Channel since scrapped

  • TodayLargest working tankers 441,500 DWT

Tanker size

Tanker size

World oil movements

World Oil Movements

Largest tanker spills

Largest tanker spills

ITOPF 2013

Tanker spills over time

Tanker spills over time

All marine spills

All marine spills

Exxon Valdez

Ixtoc 1

Torrey canyon 1967

Torrey Canyon 1967

Ekofisk bravo 1977 north sea

Ekofisk Bravo 1977 North Sea

Eleni v 1978 north sea

Eleni V 1978 North Sea

Amoco cadiz 1978 brittany

Amoco Cadiz 1978 Brittany

Atlantic empress 1979 tobago

Atlantic Empress 1979 Tobago

Ixtoc 1 1979 gulf of mexico

Ixtoc 1 1979 Gulf of Mexico

Ixtoc 1 1979

480 000t

Piper alpha 1988 north sea

Piper Alpha 1988 North Sea

167 personnel killedwith only 61 survivors

Piper alpha 1988 north sea1

Piper Alpha 1988 North Sea

A complex accident which led to a gas explosion

Oil to gas rig conversion

Pressure safety valve A removed for maintenance

Key paperwork missing

Failure in B system led to switch back to A

which was not gas-tight

Gas exploded

Worst accident to date

Memorial to Piper Alpha victims in Aberdeen

Exxon valdez 1989

Exxon Valdez 1989

Gulf war 1991

Gulf War 1991

Braer 1993 shetland

Braer 1993 Shetland

Deepwater horizon 2010

Deepwater Horizon 2010

Deepwater horizon 20101

Deepwater Horizon 2010

Elgin 2012 north sea

Elgin 2012 North Sea

You are here

The ingredients of bad accidents

The ingredients of bad accidents

The 4 damage factors

The 4 damage factors

  • What is it?

  • Where is it?

  • How much of it is there?

  • What time of year/weather is it/

Recovery factors

Recovery factors

  • Temperature

  • Flushing characteristics

  • Uniqueness of damage site

  • Reproductive strategy of endemic organisms

  • Marginality of key species

Exxon valdez

Exxon Valdez

  • Not in top 20 of big spills

  • But probably the most damaging spill of all time

  • Avoidable accident

  • Pristine, high latitude environment

  • Bad weather at key moments

  • Badly handled response – poor planning and implementation

Tensions in accident management

Tensions in Accident Management

  • Industrial/corporate

  • Social/economic – perceived risk vs actual risk

  • Political – the need to be seen to be doing something

  • Legal

  • Environmental

  • Media

  • Scientific


Obama needed to show that he was the man in charge but in reality there was nothing much he could do. In this region there is also the memory of Hurricane Katrina and the poor initial response of the Bush administration.

He was also, even at this stage, concerned about the mid-term elections.

Use of British Petroleum rather than BP stoked tensions between US and UK

The irony is that if this had happened to a US drilling company he would almost certainly needed to call BP in as consultants to fix the problem


President Obama – a man with authority but no power in this instance faced with mid-term elections

The US legal system seems to encourage compensation claims so there is an incentive for lawyers need to maximise the worst case and ‘scare’ people into signing up with them.

Local politicians have to reflect the concerns of their electorates (and many of them in this area are also republicans so no inclination to support Obama)

Scientists are scampering around the edges of all this trying to get ship time and equipment but caught in the bind of not knowing whether to accept research money from BP. I did a lot of media work over this period and I was always asked whether I had taken oil company money (or belonged to an NGO) before they would go ahead.

And through it all the media are frantically trying to find a new story to keep the cameras rolling. A long incident is quite difficult for news media because they can end up running out of new things to say. The tendency can be to ramp up the hype to try and keep people’s attention. For an objective scientist asked to comment this can be a particular problem.

Local concerns about fishing and tourism i.e. economy

The fishing and tourism industries had different imperatives. Fisheries were closed so they needed compensation and had some interests in maximising the problem.

The tourist industry was desperate to minimise the problem so as to get people visiting again

BP trying to stop spill under oversight of official US administration and manage PR with real time video coverage

Scientists trying to get reliable field data

Lawyers keen to develop compensation claims. Local politicians having their say

Media desperate for new stories

Elgin minimal conflict

Elgin - minimal conflict

  • Elgin accident was well managed – rapid evacuation of personnel effective therefore no Piper Alpha

  • Information flow was slow and press conferences given in French

  • Site was inaccessible and cloud covered so no pictures

  • All appropriate actions taken with minimum fuss and maximum effectiveness

  • Whether accident could have been completely avoided is unclear



Ospar rules offshore installations

OSPAR Rules Offshore Installations

  • 1998 OSPAR Ministerial Meeting,

    • the dumping, and leaving wholly or partly in place, of disused offshore installations is prohibited within the maritime area

  • Some exceptions (e.g. for steel installations weighing more than ten thousand tonnes in air or gravity based concrete)

Offshore structures in osparcom area

Offshore structures in OSPARCOM area


According to the latest update of the inventory, 145 installations have been decommissioned.

Brent spar

Brent Spar

Brent spar shell 1995

Brent Spar – Shell 1995+

NGO intervention led to cancellation of dumping plans and subsequent recycling in Norway

However Greenpeace did not come out unscathed when their data was faulty

Fate of decommissioned structures

Fate of decommissioned structures

Benefits through presence alone

Benefits through presence alone

  • 500m exclusion zone

  • 1284 still in commission

  • Equivalent to ~1000km2

  • Area of North Sea 750000km2

  • So ~.13% in exclusion zones

Possible benefits of non removal

Possible benefits of non-removal

  • Exclusion zones maintained

  • Drill cuttings undisturbed

  • Alternative uses

    • Centres for offshore energy generation wind/wave?

    • Desalination using solar power

    • Fish farms

    • Seal observation platform (German)

See Royal Academy of Engineering Report

Carbon capture and storage ccs

Carbon capture and storage CCS

  • Currently most interesting option

  • CO2 from industrial processes/power generation captured and injected into aquifers/spent gas reservoirs

  • This reduces CO2 emissions to atmosphere and influences global warming

  • Norwegians/Statoil already using Sleipner field has reduced emissions by 106 tonnes over 10 years

  • Around 6 UK projects in progress. First online ~2015/16?

The future

The Future

  • Shale gas versus offshore gas?

  • Oil/gas price versus recovery costs?

  • CCS as a tool in managing climate change

  • Deeper – colder – more remote

  • International versus national waters

    • Territorial disputes e.g. Arctic

High risk areas for shipping accidents

High risk areas for shipping accidents

Major losses

Major losses



  • Accidents have become less frequent

  • Both real and perceived damage can be minimised by proper planning, preparation and execution

  • The future of North Sea activities will be determined by

    • Price of hydrocarbon extration

    • Obsolescence and decommissioning

    • Alternative activities including energy generation and CCS

  • The threat of accidents is moving to high latitudes, deep waters and (potentially) the far East.

  • Login