1 / 20

Determining the Optimal Process Technology for Performance-Constrained Circuits

Determining the Optimal Process Technology for Performance-Constrained Circuits. Michael Boyer & Sudeep Ghosh ECE 563: Introduction to VLSI December 5 th , 2006. Outline. Motivation Methodology Related work Results Conclusion. Performance Classes. Unconstrained

svein
Download Presentation

Determining the Optimal Process Technology for Performance-Constrained Circuits

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Determining the Optimal Process Technology for Performance-Constrained Circuits Michael Boyer & Sudeep Ghosh ECE 563: Introduction to VLSI December 5th, 2006

  2. Outline • Motivation • Methodology • Related work • Results • Conclusion

  3. Performance Classes • Unconstrained • General-purpose microprocessors • Constrained • Digital signal processors • Many embedded devices • Relation to technology scaling

  4. Methodology • Build circuit in multiple technologies • Vary supply voltage and measure: • Delay • Active power • Leakage power • Vary duty cycle and frequency and compute minimum power

  5. Circuit

  6. PTM Threshold Voltages

  7. Total Power Calculation = activity factor T = circuit delay Ttarget = maximum delay = 1 / frequency

  8. Related Work • 1995: Minimizing Power Consumption in Digital CMOS Circuits • Chandrakasan & Brodersen • 2005: An Ultra Low Power System Architecture for Sensor Network Applications • Hempstead, et al

  9. Conclusion • 0.6um best choice for low duty cycle, low frequency operation • Problems: • PTMs • 1.6um

  10. References • S. Borkar, “Design Challenges of Technology Scaling”, IEEE Micro, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 23-29, 1999. • A. Chandrakasan and R. Brodersen, “Minimizing Power Consumption in Digital CMOS Circuits”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 498-523, 1995. • M. Hempstead, et al, “An Ultra Low Power System Architecture for Sensor Network Applications”, Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 2005. • Y. Cao, et al, “New Paradigm of Predictive MOSFET and Interconnect Modeling for Early Circuit Simulation”, CICC, pp. 201-204, 2000. • C. Hu, “BSIM Model for Circuit Design Using Advanced Technologies”, Symp. VLSI Circuits, pp. 5-6, 2001.

More Related