1 / 12

Extending University-Urban School Partnerships: The Memphis Striving Readers Project

Extending University-Urban School Partnerships: The Memphis Striving Readers Project. Richard Potts, Memphis City Schools Elizabeth Heeren, Memphis City Schools Regina Washington, Memphis City Schools AERA Conference, March 27, 2008. Motivation behind MSRP.

sunee
Download Presentation

Extending University-Urban School Partnerships: The Memphis Striving Readers Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Extending University-Urban School Partnerships: The Memphis Striving Readers Project Richard Potts, Memphis City Schools Elizabeth Heeren, Memphis City Schools Regina Washington, Memphis City Schools AERA Conference, March 27, 2008

  2. Motivation behind MSRP • Memphis is among the least-educated cities in the US • 24.3% of adults has less than a HS education • 36.7% have HS diploma or equivalent • 30.5% has Assoc. or some college • 8.5% has at least a BA • MCS is 21st largest K12 district in US >116,000 students • Over 95% of MCS’ 196 schools are Title I schools • 71% of MCS students qualify for free/reduced price lunch • MCS students are 87% AA; 9% White; 4% “other” • In 85% of MCS schools, 33% of students change schools during yr • 71% of

  3. Overall MSRP Goals To determine: • The effects of MCLA on core subject teachers’ knowledge and use of SBRR 2. The separate and combined effects of MCLA and Read 180 on students’ reading achievement levels, especially students who are identified as struggling readers 3. The separate and combined effects of MCLA and Read 180 on students’ achievement in core subjects, especially students who are identified as struggling readers

  4. Overall MSRP Goals To determine: • The effects of MCLA on core subject teachers’ knowledge and use of SBRR 2. The separate and combined effects of MCLA and Read 180 on students’ reading achievement levels, especially students who are identified as struggling readers 3. The separate and combined effects of MCLA and Read 180 on students’ achievement in core subjects, especially students who are identified as struggling readers

  5. Overall MSRP Goals To determine: • The effects of MCLA on core subject teachers’ knowledge and use of SBRR 2. The separate and combined effects of MCLA and Read 180 on students’ reading achievement levels, especially students who are identified as struggling readers 3. The separate and combined effects of MCLA and Read 180 on students’ achievement in core subjects, especially students who are identified as struggling readers

  6. NSDC recommendations for policymakers 1. Ensure that professional development focuses on the subject matter teachers will be teaching. 2. Align teachers’ learning experiences with their real work experiences, using actual curriculum materials and assessments. 3. Provide adequate time for professional development and ensure that there are extended opportunities to learn emphasizing and analyzing students’ understanding of the subject matter. 4. Ensure that school districts have reliable systems for evaluating the impact of professional development on teacher practice and student learning.

  7. Donovan & Greenburg, 2003 • Launch new partnerships strategically. • Reconfigure existing partnerships thoughtfully. • Respect and encourage different kinds of leadership. • Carefully attend to the team leader’s role. • Institutionalize partnership work and roles early in the process. • Sustain the collaborative process through democratic conversations. • Engage partners through clearly defined and agreed-upon roles. • Determine institutional rewards for partnering. • Anticipate the likely challenges of partnership building. • Share data and use it strategically. • Build a culture of self-reflection and maximize opportunities for shared learning. • Promote collaboration through funding. • Use partnerships to shape and implement policy.

  8. Heuristic for School District – University Partnerships Relevant Research Base Personal Attributes & Beliefs Institutional Commitments Situational Context

  9. Relevant Research Base • Share data and use it strategically • RBS provides external data • Coaches and instructors participate in interviews • Revised math sessions of MCLA

  10. Institutional Commitments Build a culture of self-reflection and maximize opportunities for shared learning • Santa Cruz training and CREDE encourage reflection • Coaches reflect on their roles and present about their experiences • PI’s meet regularly with district staff

  11. Personal Attributes & Beliefs Respect and encourage different types of leadership • Visionary leaders and “on the ground” implementation • Coaches encouraged to take on leadership roles • Principals’ Fellowship creates site leaders

  12. Situational Context Use partnerships to shape and implement policy • Monthly conference calls with DOE • Using data to shape MCS policy (coaches) • SRG data impacts future legislation • Presentations at multiple conferences • RBS data to monitor and adjust project

More Related