Heavy metals and microorganisms the story of chromium l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 26

Heavy Metals and Microorganisms: The Story of Chromium PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 131 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Heavy Metals and Microorganisms: The Story of Chromium. Erin Field MB433. Outline. Chromium Sources Speciation Remediation Strategies Metal-Microbe Interaction Case Study: Hanford Site. Questions to be Answered. Why is chromium contamination such a problem?

Download Presentation

Heavy Metals and Microorganisms: The Story of Chromium

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Heavy metals and microorganisms the story of chromium l.jpg

Heavy Metals and Microorganisms: The Story of Chromium

Erin Field MB433


Outline l.jpg

Outline

  • Chromium Sources

  • Speciation

  • Remediation Strategies

  • Metal-Microbe Interaction

  • Case Study: Hanford Site


Questions to be answered l.jpg

Questions to be Answered

  • Why is chromium contamination such a problem?

  • What remediation strategies are there?

  • What are the concerns associated with these remediation processes?


Where does it come from l.jpg

Where does it come from?

  • Chromate Plating and Steel manufacturing

Groundwater

  • Wood Preservatives (CCA)

  • Tanning Processes

  • Refractory bricks

  • Manufacturing dyes and pigments


Chromium speciation l.jpg

Chromium Speciation

  • Chromium can be in many different forms ranging from Cr0 to Cr6+

  • Most commonly found as Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in the environment


Chromium speciation cont l.jpg

Chromium Speciation cont.

  • Hexavalent Chromium Cr(VI)

  • CrO42-, Cr2O72-, H2CrO4, HCrO4-

  • Highly soluble

  • Highly mobile

  • Very toxic (known carcinogen)

  • Trivalent Chromium Cr(III)

  • Cr(OH)2+, Cr(OH)2-, Cr(OH)30

  • Less soluble

  • Less mobile

  • Less toxic


Contamination around the country l.jpg

Contamination Around the Country

Estimated $360 billion in the United States for cleanup and prevention of metal contamination as of 2005 (Atlas and Philip 2005).


Department of energy sites l.jpg

Department of Energy Sites

As of 2005, over 50% of the 170 DOE sites are contaminated with Chromium (Atlas and Philip 2005).


Remediation strategies l.jpg

Chemical Approaches (often changing pH with reducing agents)

Quick Response

Expensive to Apply

Lack specificity to contaminant

“Pump and Treat”: remove metals from a site in the aqueous phase and treated ex situ

Expensive, inefficient, contaminants often higher than EPA standards

“Dig and Dump”: dig up contaminated soil and dump it somewhere else

Expensive, impractical for large sites

Remediation Strategies


Remediation strategies cont l.jpg

Remediation Strategies Cont.

  • Biological Approaches (using metal-microbe interactions to immobilize and decrease toxicity of metals)

    • Inexpensive

    • Can target specific metal contaminants

    • Less impact on the ecosystem

    • Can be used in situ and ex situ


Metal microbe interactions l.jpg

Metal-Microbe Interactions


Slide12 l.jpg

Metabolism-independent sorption including both adsorption and absorption by live or dead cells. Ligands involved include carboxyl, amine, hydroxyl, phosphate, and sulfhydryl groups.

Molecular biologists are working on modifying the binding ligand to increase sorption of a specific metal. For instance, ZnO-binding peptides fused to fimbrae on the surface of E.coli.


Slide13 l.jpg

Negative influence on metal mobility. Organic acids (such as those produced through fermentation) can create a metal-chelate complex increasing the metal’s solubility and thus its mobility.


Slide14 l.jpg

Enzyme-mediated transformation of toxic metals to their less toxic forms usually through the use of these metals as electron acceptors. A cheap and less invasive method of bioremediation.


Slide15 l.jpg

Metals precipitate with enzymatically produced ligands such as sulfides and phosphates. For example, Citrobacter often creates phosphate-metal minerals. Exciting area for future research.


Cr vi and sulfate reducers l.jpg

Cr(VI) and Sulfate-reducers

  • SO4- can be reduced to S2- which can create metal sulfide precipitates

  • Cr(VI) can be actively transported into the cell through the sulfate transport system where it can damage DNA and indirectly generate oxygen radicals.


Factors influencing cr vi reduction l.jpg

Factors Influencing Cr(VI) Reduction

  • Biomass Density

  • Initial Cr(VI) Concentration

  • Carbon Source

  • pH

  • Temperature

  • Dissolved Oxygen

  • Competing Electron Acceptors

  • Soil composition


Slide18 l.jpg

Cr(VI) Reducing Microorganisms


Doe hanford site richland wa l.jpg

DOE Hanford Site, Richland, WA

  • Established in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project to manufacture plutonium for nuclear weapons. During the cold war additional nuclear reactors were built, most along the Columbia River. Water from the river was used to cool the reactors and then discharged back in. All reactors were finally shut down by 1990, but the radioactive and heavy metal waste remains.


Pilot scale study l.jpg

Pilot Scale Study

  • In August 2004, 30lbs of 13C-labled Hydrogen Release Compound (HRC) were injected into a groundwater well at the Hanford Site to reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) and Cr(III) precipitate out on soil particles

  • The HRC will yield lactate and hydrogen which can be utilized as electron donors in order to reduce Cr(VI)

30 lbs 13C-labled HRC

Injection Well

Monitoring well

15 ft.


Did it work l.jpg

Did it Work?

  • Maximum microbial cell counts were reached 13-17 days after injection.


Additional data l.jpg

Additional Data

Redox potential and dissolved oxygen data also suggest that the microorganisms were stimulated and reducing conditions occurred.


Problems at hanford l.jpg

Problems at Hanford

  • Geology (fractures)

  • Proximity to the Columbia River and plume migration

  • Oxidation of Cr(III)


Conclusions l.jpg

Conclusions

  • Chromium is a metal used in many industrial processes and continues to be a major concern of soil and groundwater contamination.

  • Metal-microbe interactions can be exploited for bioremediation purposes

  • Unlike organic contaminants, reduced metals such as Cr(III) can be re-oxidized. This is a serious concern that must be addressed at remediated sites.


References l.jpg

References

Atlas, R.M., and Philip, J. (ed) Bioremediation: Applied Microbial Solutions for Real-World Environmental Cleanup. Washington,D.C.: ASM Press, 2005.

Chen, J.M and Hao, O.J. (1998) Microbial Cr(VI) reduction. Critical Reviews in Env Sci and Tech 28(3):219-251.

Department of Energy Hanford Site (visited 2006) www.hanford.gov.

Field Investigations of Lactate-Stimulated Bioreduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) at Hanford 100H (visited 2006) http://www.esd.lbl.gov/ERT/hanford100h/index.html.

Lloyd, J.R. and Lovley, D.R. (2001) Microbial detoxification of metals and radionuclides. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 12:248-253.

Palmer, C.D. and Wittbrodt, P.R. (1991) Processes affecting the remediation of chromium-contaminated sites. Environ Health Perspect 92:25-40.

Riley, R.G. and Zachara, J.M. (1992) Chemical contaminants on DOE lands and selection of contaminant mixtures for subsurface science research. Technical Report.


Slide26 l.jpg

QUESTIONS??


  • Login