1 / 34

3D Reconstruction from a Pair of Images

3D Reconstruction from a Pair of Images. Srikumar Ramalingam Department of Computer Science University of California, Santa Cruz srikumar@cse.ucsc.edu. Overview. Problem Definition Previous Work Solution Experiments and Results Conclusion and Future work.

studs
Download Presentation

3D Reconstruction from a Pair of Images

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 3D Reconstruction from a Pair of Images Srikumar Ramalingam Department of Computer Science University of California, Santa Cruz srikumar@cse.ucsc.edu

  2. Overview • Problem Definition • Previous Work • Solution • Experiments and Results • Conclusion and Future work

  3. Problem Definition 3D Texture-Mapped Model Image-1 Image-2 Perspective View of the Model

  4. Previous Work • Zhao, Aggarwal, Mandal and Vemuri, “3D Shape Reconstruction from Multiple Views ”, Handbook of Image and Video Processing, pages 243-257, Al Bovik, 2000. • Gang Xu and Zhengyou Zhang, “Epipolar Geometry in Stereo, Motion and Object Recognition”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996. • Zhang and Faugeras, “3D Dyanamic Scene Analysis-A Stereo Based Approach”, Springer-Verlag, 1992. • Zhang, Deriche, Faugeras and Luong, “A Robust Technique for Matching Two Uncalibrated Images through the Recovery of the Unknown Epipolar Geometry”, INRIA Research Report, 1994. • Zhang, “A New Multistage Approach to Motion and Structure Estimation: From Essential Parameters to Euclidean Motion Via Fundamental Matrix”, INRIA Research Report, 1996.

  5. Previous Work • Zhang, “Determining the Epipolar Geometry and its Uncertainity: A Review”, INRIA Research Report, July 1996. • Zhang, “A Flexible New Technique for Camera Calibration”, Technical Report, Microsoft Research, 1998. • Deriche and Giraudon, “A Computational Approach for Corner and Vertex Detection”, INRIA Research Report, 1992.

  6. Solution • Feature Detection • Getting Initial Set of Matches • Medium Robust Correspondence • Strong Robust Correspondence • Camera Calibration • 3D Reconstruction

  7. Feature Detection : Harris Corner Detection

  8. Establishing Initial Set of Matches

  9. Ambiguities in the Matches

  10. Robust 1-1 Correspondence • Medium Robust Matches • Relaxation Techniques -Strong Robust Matches -Epipolar Geometry

  11. Relaxation Techniques

  12. Relaxation Strategies - Winner-take-all - Loser-take-nothing - Some-winners-take-all - ( 1 – Max_Strength / Sec_Max_St) End Result : No Ambiguities but False Matches

  13. Strong Robust Estimation using Epipolar Geometry • Epipolar Geometry and Constraint • Least Median of Squares

  14. Epipolar Geometry Point corresponding to m lies on its epipolar line lm on the other image Fundamental Matrix (F) –3x3 matrix, which relates the corresponding points

  15. Least Median of Squares – Removal of Outliers • - 8 Matches required for estimating F matrix • Different combinations (m) of 8 matches selected • Least median of squares algorithm is applied If ri < Threshold, the match is discarded.

  16. 3D Reconstruction Problem is solved for Conventional Baseline Stereo System X = b (xl+xr) / (2d) Y = b (yl+yr) / (2d) Z = bf / d

  17. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Parameters Intrinsic Parameters (5) Extrinsic Parameters (6) f – focal length 3 rotational parameters, 3 translational parameters u0, v0 – Center Intrinsic Matrix(A) ku - unit length along x direction kv – unit length along y direction Angle between x and y direction mnew(u,v)= A mold(x,y) Need to conduct an experiment to calibrate the camera

  18. 3D Reconstruction- Triangulation Robust Correspondence + Intrinsic Parameters  Extrinsic Parameters Robust Correspondence + Camera Parameters - 3D Points Camera Matrix Extrinsic Parameters

  19. Reconstructed 3D Model

  20. Implementaton Pipeline • Matlab Implementations • Harris Corner Detection Algorithm (Deriche1992, Zhang1994) • Initial Set of Matches Establishment (Zhang1994, Xu1996) • Medium Set of Matches using Relaxation Techniques (Zhang1994, Xu1996) • Strong Set of Matches using Epipolar Geometry (Zhang1994, Xu1996) • -Camera Calibration Experiment (Zhang1998) • -3D Points Reconstruction from Robust Matches and Camera Parameters (Zhang1994, Zhang1996, Xu1996) • -3D Polygonal Model Reconstruction (Delaunay Triangulation) • - Texture Mapping (OpenGL/C)

  21. Standard Data Sets- Corner marked

  22. Robust 1-1 Correspondence shown

  23. Color Coding for Z Coordinates after 3D Reconstruction

  24. 3D Delaunay Triangulation

  25. 3D Texture Mapped Model – On Rotation

  26. Real Data Sets and Results Baskin Engineering Parking Scene – Two Images

  27. Feature Points using Corner Detection process

  28. Robust Set of Matches

  29. Color Coding for Z Coordinates after 3D Reconstruction Red-Max, Green – Intermediate, Blue – Min depths

  30. 3D Delaunay Triangulation

  31. Texture Mapped 3D Model of the Scene Perspective View of the Texture Mapped 3D Model

  32. Camera Calibration Experiment • -Checker pattern • -3 images taken in different orientations • Corners are marked • Computation of camera parameters

  33. Conclusion and Future Work • Increasing the number of feature points • Multiple Images • Alternate Algorithms • 3D Reconstruction of Urban Scenes (Faugeras 1995) • - Registration within GIS Data

  34. Questions?

More Related