1 / 14

COSTING AND MARKETING AS A SOURCE OF RIVALRY IN THE ROAD

Understand the competitive environment of Carrier X and assess if ABC costing can be a basis for future costing, recommending necessary adaptations to the current marketing strategy.

stoneman
Download Presentation

COSTING AND MARKETING AS A SOURCE OF RIVALRY IN THE ROAD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. COSTING AND MARKETING AS A SOURCE OF RIVALRY IN THE ROAD K B A De JENGA, J FIELD, P THOMAS and M MPINGANJIRA

  2. Background to the research This research was conducted by 2 master’s students working as a team under two supervisors. The transport company requested the research. The research aim was to firstly understand the competitive environment within which Carrier X was currently operating. From this, the researchers assessed whether ABC costing could be considered as a basis for Carrier X future costing, and, to recommend what was required to adapt current marketing strategy Gaps identified

  3. Background • The multiplication of competition in the industry since 2008 has led to • intensified rivalry, as established logistics companies fight to retain their share. • Havenga and Simpson (2018) reveal that customers of the transport industry in • SA are now highly price-sensitive looking to change their transport providers • based on better pricing for their transport needs. • Carrier X traditionally built long-term and mutually beneficial customer • relationships through customised offerings (Cui, Hertz & Su, 2010). • Carrier X specialises in transporting: chemicals, steel, fuel, mining equipment, • gas, and sugar; • Offers end to end supply chain solutions; • Provides a unique, bespoke software (IT) platform that enables Carrier X • staff and clients to eliminate costly bottlenecks for their customers by actively • being involved in customer stock management proactively managing customer • inventory holdings. • The research aim sought to understand the competitive environment • within which Carrier X operates. From this, the researchers assessed whether • ABC costing could be considered as a basis for Carrier X future costing, • and, to consider what was required to adapt current marketing strategy Gaps identified

  4. Carrier X Marketing and Costing • Traditionally Carrier X has employed a differentiated marketing strategy • producing non-standardised transport solutions for customers who have until • recently valued differentiated features more than they value low cost • (Ireland, Hoskisson & Hitt, 2008; Hill & Jones, 2009). • Carrier X has invested heavily in its IT solutions service which creates high • exit barriers for it (Hooley et al., 2012) • Carrier X targeted customers who were relatively price insensitive, leading to • premium pricing. • This long-term contract-based way of doing business relied on projected • financial returnas a costing model per contract. • While this kind of pricing eliminates dubious returns and uncertainty in the • project-customer contract - it also eliminated the flexibility of a bespoke • per-contract stage, pricing strategy.

  5. Problem statement • There was a need for Carrier X to identify ways to create competitive advantages • over similar others for Carrier X’s viability. • Management did not understand the factors affecting their ability to create • competitive advantage, so the company was unable to craft strategies to enable • it to be sustainable. • This study aimed to explore possible sources of competitive • advantage for this South African firm. (RQs must correspond to ROs) (State null and alternative hypotheses) (Identify Variables – i.e. Dependent/ Independent/ Moderator/ Control)

  6. Research Questions/ Research Objectives/ Hypotheses/ Variables (2) • Carrier X requested the researchers to review: • Researcher question 1 was: What are the sources of competitive advantage • by the use of marketed products and services for Carrier X? • Researcher question 2 was: Can an activity-based accounting (ABC) costing • model provide a competitive advantage for Carrier X? (RQs must correspond to ROs) (State null and alternative hypotheses) (Identify Variables – i.e. Dependent/ Independent/ Moderator/ Control)

  7. Conceptual or Theoretical Framework (1) • Marketing • Angelovaand Zekiri (2011) suggest that product/service differentiation can be a competitive weapon in marketing • Offerings and yet this research showed that Carrier X did not adopt them. • With the customer management process, managers must define marketing that captures the creation of customer • value in terms of what satisfies customers (Hou, 2015) . • Internal transformation processes should involve marketing that evolves from the continuous evaluation of how well • processes work and belong together and should be constantly adjusted and redesigned in response to changing • external environment (Nilsson, Olve & Parment, 2011) • Costing • Hill and Jones (2009) highlight the danger of customer bargaining power for firms like Carrier X when customers • have the power to put considerable pressure on the firm demanding improved quality and/or lower prices. • To introduce more efficient costing focuses on the use of activity-based costing (ABC) (Hicks, 1999; • Lin, et al., 2007). • ABC has a real role to play to cost cause-and-effect through the allocation of indirect costs per length of road • route because of the ability to trace each cost driver per kilometre (Els, 2014). • In transport logistics, this technique of route mapping costing develops a more efficient supply chain model • (Nenni, 2013). Conceptual (Qualitative), Theoretical (Quantitative)

  8. Research Methodology • This was a case study; using an interpretivist philosophy adopting an inductive • Approach to analysis • -Semi-structured qualitative interviews were carried out by researchers’ 1 and • 2 with individual participants • MARKETING • Researcher 1 approached 10 procurement officers for Carrier X customers for • interviews and seven accepted. The selected customers were located in • Gauteng • Researcher 1 also interviewed four Carrier X senior staff: the Marketing Director • two Divisional Directors (Sales); and the Human Resource Director. (Philosophy – i.e. Positivism/ Realism/ Interpretive) (Approach – i.e. Deductive/ Inductive) (Strategy – i.e. Interviews/ Surveys/ Case study) (Choices – i.e. Mono/ Multi/ Mixed method)

  9. Research Methodology • COSTING • Researcher 2 reviewed Carrier X’s IT maintenance logs, internal budget • and financial reports to review how fixed costs are recouped, and how the • various departments of the firm raised revenue from each other. • Researcher 2 interviewed Carrier X accounting and IT staff probing the • differentiation costing currently adopted by Carrier X from the perspective of • internal staff Setting – i.e. Controlled/ Natural) (Target population – i.e. Location/ Size of target population) (Sample size – Number of participants based on target population size OR research instrument used) (Sampling technique – i.e. Probability/ Non-probability and specify type/s used)

  10. Research Methodology • Data Analysis • Both researchers used thematic content analysis to identify, analyse, and describe patterns across the interview data set (Jacob & Furgerson, 2012). • Researcher 2 adopted thematic analysis by reviewing historic data from the IT request logging system: This gave the researcher insight to the competency for carrier X to implement ABC costing widely across the company as it showed the researcher the extent to which Carrier X was allocating costs to individual activities withinb its sophisticated IT platform. Statistical (Quantitative data) (i.e. Descriptive statistics, Inferential statistics) (Tools: IBM SPSS analysis) Thematical Analysis/ QDA (Qualitative data) (i.e. Content analysis, Narrative analysis/ Conversation analysis/ Grounded Theory/ Visual analysis) (Tools: Nvivo, Altas,ti, Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis (CAQDAS))

  11. Findings • INTERVIEWS • MARKETING • Carrier X employeesnoted the firm had taken too long to respond to market changes because they had always served such a specialised market where they had few competitorsthey didn’t bother changing their marketing • To be attractive to a wider range of customers. • Carrier X was considered complacent by customers. Customers had less money to spend on transport but Carrier X had invested in expensive software to support customer requirements and so was unwilling to change customer market products/services. Statistical (Quantitative data) (i.e. Descriptive statistics, Inferential statistics) (Tools: IBM SPSS analysis) Thematical Analysis/ QDA (Qualitative data) (i.e. Content analysis, Narrative analysis/ Conversation analysis/ Grounded Theory/ Visual analysis) (Tools: Nvivo, Altas,ti, Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis (CAQDAS))

  12. Findings • INTERVIEWS • COSTING • Carrier X staff interviewees noted that the firm had no substantive measure of the efficiency of internal shared services • The IT department were implementing a type of ABC costing system but up to the point of this research, did not recognise its value as an assessment measure for both costing and efficiency, using it only to prioritise work load. Statistical (Quantitative data) (i.e. Descriptive statistics, Inferential statistics) (Tools: IBM SPSS analysis) Thematical Analysis/ QDA (Qualitative data) (i.e. Content analysis, Narrative analysis/ Conversation analysis/ Grounded Theory/ Visual analysis) (Tools: Nvivo, Altas,ti, Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis (CAQDAS))

  13. Conclusions and Recommendations In answer to question 1:What are the sources of competitive advantage by the use of marketed products and services for Carrier X? - Carrier X must explore how to offer/market their very specialized software and transport at prices that attract a wider variety of customers. - Carrier X could co-create and market services with customers who can provide valuable insight to the development of new applications of existing resources with new efficiencies.

  14. Conclusions and Recommendations In answer to question 2: Can an activity-based accounting (ABC) costing model provide a competitive advantage for Carrier X? Carrier X could improve their costing model by introducing ABC costing to distribute the value of internal specialised IT services across Carrier X departments. -ABC accounting can provide competitive advantages provided the managerial climate of internal implementation is conducive Carrier X was not found to be calculating their projected profit per contract accurately and restructuring this could help with ensuring expected returns per contract. However, Bangalee and Suleman (2015), Hsu and Chiang (2014), and Bokor and Markovits-Somogyi (2015) note knowledge of ABC is not widespread with users deterred by the difficulty of using it.

More Related