1 / 28

ME 381R Fall Lecture 24: Micro-Nano Scale Thermal-Fluid Measurement Techniques

ME 381R Fall Lecture 24: Micro-Nano Scale Thermal-Fluid Measurement Techniques. Dr. Li Shi Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78712 www.me.utexas.edu/~lishi lishi@mail.utexas.edu. Visualization of Microflows. References:

stian
Download Presentation

ME 381R Fall Lecture 24: Micro-Nano Scale Thermal-Fluid Measurement Techniques

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ME 381R Fall Lecture 24: Micro-Nano Scale Thermal-Fluid Measurement Techniques Dr. Li Shi Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78712 www.me.utexas.edu/~lishi lishi@mail.utexas.edu

  2. Visualization of Microflows • References: • A particle image velocimetry system for microfluidics, Santiago, J.G et al. Experiments in Fluids, 25, pp. 316-319. (1998) • 2. PIV measurements of a microchannel flow, Meinhart et al. Experiments in Fluids, 27, pp. 414-419 (1999) • 3. J.I. Molho, A.E. Herr, T.W. Kenny, M.G. Mungal, P.M. St.John, M.G. Garguilo, P.H . Paul, M. Deshpande, and J.R. Gilbert, "Fluid Transport Mechanisms in Microflui dic Devices", Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS), 1998 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (DSC-Vol.66)  Caged fluorescence Micro Particle Image Velocimetry (mPIV)

  3. Caged Fluorescence • Fluorescent dye chemically locked in a stable molecule until hit with Nd:YAG laser which “uncages” it. • Uncaged dye is pumped with Microblue diode pumped laser. • Fluorescence is imaged with CCD camera. • (Molho. Et.at. 1998)

  4. Results Experiment matches prediction for uniform “plug flow” for some cases studied. No discernable boundary layers, but some diffusion. http://microfluidics.stanford.edu/caged.htm

  5. More Results In other cases though, flow looks very much like a pressure-driven Poiseuille flow Electro-Kinetic Flow can actually induce a pressure gradient in a capillary flow and thus alter the basic flow structure http://microfluidics.stanford.edu/caged.htm

  6. Comparison with CFD Electro-Osmotic flow is relatively simple to model with standard CFD solvers. For pressure driven micro-capillary flow, CFD predicts flow field remarkably well, as shown in comparison of experimental and computational results at left. (Molho et.al. 1998)

  7. Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) Cross-correlation • Seed flow with particles • Don’t affect fluid characteristics • Accurately follow the flow • Illuminate flow at two time instances separated by t (e.g. using Nd:YAG laser) • Record images of particle fields (e.g. CCD camera) • Determine particle displacement • Calculate velocity as V x/ t Velocity vector Interrogation windows 32x32 pixels, 0.6 x 0.6 mm Images from Tsurikov and Clemens (2002) Particle fields 1024 x 1024 pixels 21 x 21 mm Raw velocity field Mean velocity subtracted Turbulent velocity field

  8. The Need for -PIV • The physics is not very clear in micro flows (e.g. surface tension) • Typical length scales of 1-100 m, traditional flow diagnostics cannot be employed • Most micro-flow measurements were limited to bulk properties of the flow like wall pressure and bulk velocity • PIV enables measurements of velocity field in two dimensions

  9. Other efforts • Particle streak imaging by Brody et al. (1996) • Less accurate than pulsed velocimetry measurements • Lanzilloto et al. (1997) used X-ray micro-imaging of emulsion droplets • Emulsion is deformable, large and not a good tracker of the flowfield • Optical Doppler Tomographic imaging by Chen et al. (1997) using Michelson interferometry • Single point measurement

  10. -PIV • Particles used must be small enough to • Follow the flow • Should not clog the device • They must also be large enough to • Emit sufficient light • Sufficiently damp out Brownian motion • Particles are tagged with a fluorescent dye; hence actually imaging the fluorescence • Elastic scattering measurements are more difficult to employ in the micro-scale • Inelastic scattering like fluorescence can be readily filtered out

  11. -PIV • Errors in measurement due to Brownian motion when measuring velocities of 10 m/sec • Error induced by Brownian motion sets a lower limit on the time separation between the images

  12. First -PIV system • Essentially a microscope imaging fluorescence from the seed particles From Santiago et al. (1998)

  13. State of the art -PIV system http://microfluidics.stanford.edu/piv.htm From Meinhart et al. (1999)

  14. Demonstration of -PIV • Hele-Shaw flow (Re=3e-4) • used the first -PIV system discussed before • Micro-channel flow • Uses the laser based system

  15. Velocity fields: Hele-Shaw • Shows instantaneous and average images • Effect of Brownian motion goes away on averaging • Spatial resolution 6.9 m x 6.9 m x 1.5 m From Santiago et al. (1998)

  16. Velocity Fields in a Micro-channel • Shows mean velocity profiles in a micro-channel • Measurements agree within 2% to analytical solutions From Meinhart et al. (1999)

  17. Comparison to analytical solution From Meinhart et al. (1999)

  18. Thermometry of Nanoelectronics Techniques Spatial Resolution Infrared Thermometry 1-10 mm* Laser Surface Reflectance 1 mm* Raman Spectroscopy 1 mm* Liquid Crystals 1 mm* Near-Field Optical Thermometry < 100 nm Scanning Thermal Microscopy (SThM) < 100 nm *Diffraction limit for far-field optics

  19. Thermal Topographic Z T X X Scanning Thermal Microscopy Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) + Thermal Probe Laser Deflection Sensing Cantilever Temperature sensor Sample X-Y-Z Actuator

  20. 10 mm Microfabricated Thermal Probes Pt Line Tip Pt-Cr Junction Laser Reflector SiNx Cantilever Cr Line Shi, Kwon, Miner, Majumdar, J. MicroElectroMechanical Sys., 10, p. 370 (2001)

  21. Thermal Imaging of Nanotubes Thermal 30 10 10 20 5 5 Height (nm) Height (nm) 30 nm 30 nm 10 0 0 0 -400 -200 0 200 400 -400 -400 -200 -200 0 0 200 200 400 400 Distance (nm) Distance (nm) Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Topography Topography 3 V m 88 A m m 1 1 m m Spatial Resolution V) m 50 nm Thermal signal ( Distance (nm) Shi, Plyosunov, Bachtold, McEuen, Majumdar, Appl. Phys. Lett., 77, p. 4295 (2000)

  22. Low bias: Ballistic High bias: Dissipative (optical phonon emission) Metallic Single Wall Nanotube Topographic Thermal DTtip A B C D 2 K 0 1 mm

  23. Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor (MOSFET)

  24. Ideal MOSFET VG>0

  25. Pinch-Off & IV

  26. Thermal Circuit Particle transport theory Fourier’s law of heat conduction

  27. Joule Heating inHigh-Field Devices Localized heat generation near the pinch-off point

  28. Future Challenge: Temperature Mapping of Nanotransistors SOI Devices SiGe Devices • Low thermal conductivities of SiO2 and SiGe • Interface thermal resistance • Short (10-100 nm) channel effects (ballistic transport, quantum transport) • Phonon “bottleneck” (optical-acoustic phonon decay length > channel length) • Few thermal measurements are available to verify simulation results

More Related