1 / 42

Household Surveys ACS – CPS - AHS

Household Surveys ACS – CPS - AHS. INFO 7470 / ECON 8500 Warren A. Brown University of Georgia February 22, 2011. CES Discussion Papers. Purpose Target Population Sampling Frame Data Collection Non-Response Missing Data. Weighting Sampling Error PUF / IUF Data Access to Reports

stew
Download Presentation

Household Surveys ACS – CPS - AHS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Household SurveysACS – CPS - AHS INFO 7470 / ECON 8500 Warren A. Brown University of Georgia February 22, 2011

  2. CES Discussion Papers

  3. Purpose Target Population Sampling Frame Data Collection Non-Response Missing Data Weighting Sampling Error PUF / IUF Data Access to Reports Research Questions Resources Outline

  4. American Community Survey Sponsor: Census Bureau Collector: Census Bureau Purpose: “The American Community Survey (ACS) is an ongoing survey that provides data every year -- giving communities the current information they need to plan investments and services. Information from the survey generates data that help determine how more than $400 billion in federal and state funds are distributed each year.”

  5. ACS: Purpose • Key Component for Re-Engineered Census • Replacing the Decennial Census “Long-Form” • Continuous measurement rather than snapshot • Meet federal legislative and program needs • Other stakeholders in state and local government and private sectors • Provide annual data on demographic, social, economic and housing characteristics. • Improve the Federal Statistical System

  6. Advantages of the ACS • Timeliness • Comparability • Reliability • Numerous data products

  7. ACS: Target Population • Current residence not “Usual Residence” • “two-month rule” • Household population in 2005 • Total (HH + GQ) in 2006 and …. • GQ residency is “de facto”

  8. ACS: Sampling Frame • Master Address File (MAF) • Official inventory of known living quarters • Linked to TIGER • Housing Units • Based on Census 2000 MAF and updates from the USPS’ Delivery Sequence File • Group Quarters • … and updates from the administrative records and the FSCPE • Excluded from ACS are domestic violence shelters, soup kitchens, commercial maritime vessels,…

  9. ACS: Design of the Sample • Annual Sample Size of 3 million addresses • Series of Monthly Samples of 250,000 addresses • HU sample in each of the 3,141 Counties • Areas with smaller populations sampled at higher rates than those with larger populations • HU Address sampling rate set by Block based on entity (municipality, school district, tract) • Final sampling rate varies between 1.6% and 10% • No HU address can be sampled more than once in 5 years

  10. ACS: Questionnaire • Content designed to meet the needs of federal government agencies • 21 housing and 48 population questions • Household Respondent provides responses for all other residents of the household • Householder or Reference Person is “Person 1”

  11. ACS: Data Collection • HU addresses by three modes • Mailout of paper questionnaire in 1st month • Telephone (CATI) non-response follow-up in 2nd month • Personal visit (CAPI) non-response follow-up in 3rd month to a sub-sample • GQ • Personal visit within 6 weeks of sample selection

  12. Data Collection Timetable

  13. Non-Response Follow Up • 1st Month – Mailed Questionnaire • 2nd Month – Attempt at Telephone Interview • 3rd Month – Sub-Sample of Non-Respondents • 67% unmailable addresses • 50% low response tracts • 33% high response tracts

  14. ACS: Response Rates • Participation is mandatory • Sample addresses eligible for interviewing: • 51% Mail response • 9% CATI non-response follow-up • 38% CAPI non-response follow-up • 2% Non-interview

  15. ACS: Missing Data Item non-response or failed edit check • FEFU – failed-edit follow-up • More than 5 household members • Critical questions not answered • 33% of mail return questionnaires in 2005 • Imputation • Assignment used other data on respondent • Allocation – hot deck procedure • Flags variables

  16. ACS: Weighting • Person and Housing Unit weights • Three stages • Probability of selection (initial sampling rate) • Adjust for non-response • Control to Population Estimates • Sum the weights • Person weights for person characteristics • HU weights for family, household or housing unit characteristics • Householders = Households ???

  17. ACS: Weighty Issues ACS 2005 for United States • 288,378,137 Persons in Households • 111,090,617 Households • 114,763,475 Householders • Average Household Size • 2.60 based on Households • 2.51 based on Householders

  18. ACS: Sampling Error • Publishing margins of error in tables • More sample less error • 1, 3, and 5 year estimates and associated sampling error • Sampling error for small area data is proving to be a problem

  19. Complex Sample Surveys and Weights • Weight - numeric variable expressing the number of housing units or people that an individual microdata record represents • Sum of the housing unit and person weights for a geographic area is equal to the estimate of the total number of housing units and people in that area • Values for weights vary • Different Probability of Selection • Differential Response Rate • Control to Population Estimates

  20. Alternatives for Estimating Standard Error • Design Factor • Replicate Weights • Ignore

  21. Alternatives for Estimating Standard Error • Design Factor • Design factors are factors to multiply times the standard error of a simple random sample. • Easier to use than the replicate weights • Replicate Weights • Generally, more accurate • Somewhat more work than design factors

  22. Estimate of Sampling Error Using Design Factors

  23. Design Factors * West Virginia is 1.0 for Age and 1.5 for Person Income

  24. Estimate of Standard Error Using Replicate Weights where: • X is the estimate formed from the PUMS weight • Xr is the estimate formed from the rth replicate weight.

  25. PUF / IUF • 1% Sample • PUMA • Top Coding • Collapsed Categories • Perturbation • No Administrative • 2.5% Sample • Block/Tract/Place • Full Distribution • Full Distribution • Actual Ages • Details of Collection

  26. ACS: Research Questions

  27. Resources • Census Bureau • IPUMS • Michigan Population Studies Center • National Academy Sciences-CNSTAT

  28. ACS on www.census.gov

  29. http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/dis/acs/dataanalysis/UsingReplicateWeights.htmlhttp://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/dis/acs/dataanalysis/UsingReplicateWeights.html

  30. NAS-CNSTAT ACS Reports *********** 2001, CNSTAT’s 2007, Census 2008, core sponsors Bureau NSF/SRS

More Related