1 / 30

WMO Radio Spectrum Workshop-Meteorological Radar Spectrum Issues

WMO Radio Spectrum Workshop-Meteorological Radar Spectrum Issues. Presented By: David Franc Office of Radio Frequency Management. March 2006. Purpose.

Download Presentation

WMO Radio Spectrum Workshop-Meteorological Radar Spectrum Issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WMO Radio Spectrum Workshop-Meteorological Radar Spectrum Issues Presented By: David Franc Office of Radio Frequency Management March 2006

  2. Purpose • Provide background information on, and current status of radio frequency issues that may impact global meteorological radar operations, and identify items for consideration by Members • This section of the workshop covers radars used for monitoring the atmosphere with the exception of Wind Profiler Radars

  3. Outline • Meteorological radar bands • ITU-R Recommendations • Spectrum issues • WRC-2007 Agenda Item 1.3 • WRC-2007 Agenda Item 1.4 • JRG-1A/1C/8B • Work of Working Party 8B (WP 8B) • Important points

  4. Meteorological Radar Bands

  5. Meteorological Radar Bands • Three allocations exist in the Radio Regulations specifically identified for meteorological radars • 2700-2900 MHz- ground based radars • 5600-5650 MHz- ground based radars • 9300-9500 MHz- ground based and airborne radars • Depending on type of use, radionavigation and radiolocation bands can also be used

  6. Need for 3 Frequency Bands? • System cost, complexity and operating range are all limitations that can be addressed through additional engineering and funding • Severe weather performance is a physical limitation that can not be addressed through additional engineering or funding • Severe weather performance is dependent upon frequency of operation

  7. Severe Weather Performance Limitation • The ability of a meteorological radar to measure high wind speeds at its outer operational range is limited by the frequency of operation v * r  1/f Therefore, as frequency increases, the maximum range or maximum observable velocity, or both must decrease Maximum range Frequency Maximum velocity

  8. Performance Comparison of Bands System Cost: Highest- 2700-2900 MHz Lowest- 9300-9500 MHz System Complexity: Highest- 2700-2900 MHz Lowest- 9300-9500 MHz Operating Range: ~450 km- 2700-2900 MHz ~200 km- 5600-5650 MHz <75 km- 9300-9500 MHz Severe Weather Highest- 2700-2900 MHz Performance: Lowest- 9300-9500 MHz

  9. ITU-R Meteorological Radar Recommendations

  10. Technical and Operational Characteristics • The following Recommendations provide technical and operational characteristics of meteorological radars • ITU-R M.1464: 2700-2900 MHz • ITU-R M.1460: 2900-3100 MHz • ITU-R M.1638: 5250-5850 MHz • ITU-R M.[8B.8-10GHZ]: 8-10 GHz* • Use: Information for conducting sharing studies *- Still under development within WP 8B

  11. ITU-R M.1461 • Content: General procedures for conducting sharing studies with radars • Use: Guidance to conduct sharing studies • M.1461 is very generic and does not address the specificneeds of meteorological radars • Companion recommendation on meteorological radars under development within WP 8B

  12. Wind Profiler Technical and Operational Characteristics • The following provide technical and operational characteristics of Wind Profiler Radars • ITU-R M.1226: Around 50 MHz • ITU-R M.1085: Around 400 MHz • ITU-R M.1227: Around 1000 MHz • Use: Information for conducting sharing studies • In need of review and update

  13. Current Spectrum Issues

  14. Current Spectrum Issues • WRC Agenda Item 1.3 • WRC Agenda Item 1.4 • JRG-1A/1C/8B: Radar emission masks • Working Party 8B • Compatibility analysis procedures • Protection criteria • Statistics-based compatibility analysis

  15. WRC-Agenda Item 1.3 • Objective: • Upgrade radiolocation service (radars) to primary status in 9300- 9500 MHz • Earth exploration satellite service (EESS) allocation extension into 9300-9500 MHz • Impact: • Radiolocation upgrade raises the status of meteorological radars to primary status • Extension of EESS in 9300-9500 MHz could impact meteorological radars

  16. Agenda Item 1.3 (continued) • Status: • Studies underway to evaluate impact of EESS to meteorological radars in 9300-9500 MHz • EESS extension could be placed in 9800-10000 MHz- not preferred approach • Advantages: • EESS could have meteorological applications • Radiolocation upgrade important for meteorological radar operations

  17. Agenda Item 1.4 • Objective: • Consider frequency related issues associated with IMT-2000 and IMT Advanced • IMT-2000: Third generation (3G) mobile telecommunications • IMT Advanced: Fourth generation mobile telecommunications • Impact: • 2700-2900 MHz has been identified as a candidate band for Agenda Item 1.4 • Use of band for IMT-2000 or IMT Advanced will cause loss of spectrum for meteorological operations

  18. Agenda Item 1.4 (continued) • Status: • WRC-2000: studies on impact to existing users (radars) were incomplete- created preliminary WRC-2007 Agenda Item • WRC-2003: studies showed IMT-2000 and existing systems were incompatible - Agenda Item deleted from WRC-2007 agenda • Studies now being updated for re-submission to ITU-R • Advantages: • None to meteorological operations

  19. JRG-1A/1C/8B • Objective: • Develop ITU-R Recommendation(s) on radar emission masks • Emission masks define the required roll-off from the fundamental frequency • Impact: • Could place design limitations on radar technology • Advantages: • Limit adjacent channel and adjacent band interference • Increased spectrum efficiency

  20. JRG-1A/1C/8BEmission Mask Example #1 Source: JRG-1A/1C/8B Doc. 52

  21. JRG-1A/1C/8BEmission Mask Example #2 Source: JRG-1A/1C/8B Doc. 52

  22. JRG-1A/1C/8B Work Plan • Define necessary 20 dB and 40 dB bandwidth for various radar technologies • Define roll-off beyond 40 dB bandwidth- 20 dB or 40 dB per decade • Need emission data and characteristics for example radars • Ensure realistic limits are established • Identify technology that needs different limits

  23. Work of Working Party 8B (WP 8B) • Compatibility analysis procedures • Statistics-based compatibility analysis • Protection criteria

  24. Compatibility Analysis Procedures • Methods used for evaluating impact of sharing spectrum between radars and other services • Meteorological radars are different than other radars • WP 8B developing a document specific to Meteorological Radars

  25. Statistics-Based Compatibility Analysis • WP 8B is studying ways to use statistical analysis to improve the accuracy of sharing studies • May allow for use of more accurate propagation models • Could require radar operators to accept interference for short periods of time • Exceedance value greater than 0% associated with Protection Criteria

  26. Radar Protection Criteria • Protection Criteria- the maximum interference level threshold for protection of radar • Protection criteria for meteorological radars dependent on • Base product accuracy • Minimum usable signal-to-noise ratio • Radar receiver noise level • Current meteorological radar protection criteria not clearly defined in the ITU

  27. Important Points

  28. Important Points • WRC-2007 Agenda Item 1.3 • Radiolocation upgrade benefits meteorological radar operations • EESS extension into 9300 - 9500 MHz • May impact meteorological radars • may also benefit meteorological operations • WRC-2007 Agenda Item 1.4 • The band 2700-2900 MHz inappropriate for use by IMT-2000 and IMT Advanced

  29. Important Points (continued) • JRG-1A/1C/8B • Should be followed to ensure emission masks do not overly restrict radar design • Other Work of WP 8B • Follow discussions on compatibility analysis procedures, including use of statistics to ensure meteorological radars will be protected

  30. Important Points (continued) • Work with your National Spectrum Regulators • Raise their awareness of spectrum needs for meteorological radar operations • Participate in the meetings of the ITU if resources allow • Ensure your radar system characteristics and requirements are documented in ITU-R recommendations

More Related