1 / 20

Background Objective - to demonstrate Radioecological Risk Assessment

Application of ERICA outputs and AQUARISK to evaluate radioecological risk of effluents from a nuclear site J. Twining & J. Ferris. Outline of talk. Background Objective - to demonstrate Radioecological Risk Assessment Dose Assessment software - EXPOSURE

stesha
Download Presentation

Background Objective - to demonstrate Radioecological Risk Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Application of ERICA outputs and AQUARISK to evaluate radioecological risk of effluents from a nuclear site J. Twining & J. Ferris

  2. Outline of talk • Background Objective - to demonstrate Radioecological Risk Assessment • Dose Assessment software - EXPOSURE • FASSET Radiation Effects Database - RESPONSE • Ecological Risk Assessment (AQUARISK) • Case Study in Radioecological Risk Assessment • Results • Conclusions Quantitative, probabilistic, radioecological risk assessment

  3. Radiological Dose - EXPOSURE • Radiological Impact Analysis for Coastal Aquatic Ecosystems V1.15 and Freshwater Ecosystems V1.15 • Converts measured or modelled radioactivity concentrations in water (Bq L-1) into dose rates (Gy hr-1) • For a range of radiologically significant nuclides, biota and habitats • Each organism is represented as an ellipsoid for LET calculations • Assessment of dose to each organism is determined using concentration factors (internal dose) and positioning relative to soil/sediment or water (external dose). Quantitative, probabilistic, radioecological risk assessment

  4. Radiological Effect - RESPONSE (FASSET Radiation Effects Database, FRED) • FRED is a database of published information on the effects of acute and chronic exposure to ionising radiation on different biota (EC 5th Framework FASSET initiative) • Groups data by: • wildlife “group” (e.g. amphibians, reptiles, mammals etc.) • umbrella endpoint: mutation, morbidity, reproduction, mortality • Provides information on dose (rate) response Quantitative, probabilistic, radioecological risk assessment

  5. Exposure curve Response curve Probability density (derived from frequency of observations) % of species likely to be affected (Log) Dose-rate (µGy hr-1) reduction in dose-rate required to achieve a tolerable level of harm Ecological Risk Assessment (AQUARISK) • A 3-tiered approach • Tier-1: Comparison with regulatory limits or guidelines • Tier-2: Desk-top study involving available and relevant literature data • Tier-3: Site-specific data and modelling • The 2nd & 3rd Tiers use probability density functions to derive site &/or species specific acceptability criteria • Convolution of the Exposure and Response PDFs • determines the likely degree of ecological impact and • the extent of • remediation • required

  6. Case Study - Scenarios • Effluent releases from ANSTO at the LHSTC in Sydney, Australia • (1) Routine releases into the marine environment at Potter Point via the sewage system and tertiary treatment at Cronulla STP • (assumes 735x dilution as realistic for the site, chronic exposure) • (2) Possible accidental release into the Woronora River after failure of the main holding tank • (assumes no loss of activity overland, no dilution, acute exposure) Quantitative, probabilistic, radioecological risk assessment

  7. Scenarios (1) Potter Point • (2) Woronora R

  8. AQUARISK Input data - EXPOSURE • Monitoring data for 3H, 60Co, 131I & 137Cs over Jan 2002-Jun 2003 based on monthly averages • Activity concentrations were converted to dose rates using either Coastal or Freshwater RIA software (using updated CFs and default weighting factors) • Once converted to dose-rate no differentiation was made for radionuclide • Only used output for organisms that corresponded to data available in the FASSET Radiation Effects Database (FRED) Quantitative, probabilistic, radioecological risk assessment

  9. EXPOSURE Estimation • Dose-rate from averaged radionuclide concentrations • - Scenario #1

  10. EXPOSURE Estimation • Dose from averaged radionuclide concentrations • - Scenario # 2

  11. AQUARISK Input data - RESPONSE • FASSET Radiation Effects Database (FRED) (using categories and information in the FRED to select data for use in Radioecological Risk Assessment) • HNEDRs and LOEDRs only, and excluding ‘Background’ data (retains ~10% of available data) • no distinction based on radionuclide • no discrimination based on effect measured (all adverse effects assumed to be ecologically relevant) • all units converted to Gy hr-1 or Gy (using conservative assumptions) Quantitative, probabilistic, radioecological risk assessment

  12. RESPONSE Estimation • Dose-response cumulative probability (data from FRED)

  13. Results: Tier-1 assessment • Scenarios (1) and (2) both pass a Tier-1 assessment against international recommendations Garnier LaPlace et. al. 2006 – Freshwater ecosystems  10Gy hr-1 Maximum estimated dose rates for all spp. (Gy hr-1, n = 162) (1) Routine release into a marine ecosystem 0.3 [(2) Accidental release to a freshwater system 8.7] Quantitative, probabilistic, radioecological risk assessment

  14. Results: Tier-2 AQUARISK-derived criteria (using data selected from the FRED) • Criteria for 90-95% protection (using Acute &/or Chronic data selected from the FRED) cover the range of international dose-rate recommendations (i.e. 10 – 400 uGy.hr-1) • Criteria based exclusively on chronic RESPONSE data are substantially lower • Max. est. acute dose in Scenario (2) is 0.006 Gy Quantitative, probabilistic, radioecological risk assessment

  15. Results: Tier-2 Assessment • Probability of criteria exceedence Quantitative, probabilistic, radioecological risk assessment

  16. Results: Tier-2 Assessment (cont.) estimated proportion of affected species • Convolution of the EXPOSURE and RESPONSE probability density functions indicates the % of species potentially affected • Scenario (1) - Marine = 1.5 to 2.5% (depends on selection of ‘Acute & Chronic’ or ‘Chronic only’ RESPONSE data) • Scenario (2) - Freshwater = 0.2 to 0.3% (depends on selection of ‘Acute & Chronic’ dose-rate data or ‘Acute only’ dose data) Quantitative, probabilistic, radioecological risk assessment

  17. Conclusions - Case study • Scenarios (1) and (2) pass the Tier-1 RRA and hence can be considered of low risk to the organisms in the receiving environments • Tier 2 assessments using AQUARISK indicate lower dose rate criteria may be applied for chronic, routine releases under Scenario (1) • - Operational efforts should focus on Co-60 • However, low species impacts are predicted for either scenario even when all conservative assumptions have been applied in line with the Precautionary Principle. • Biomonitoring under scenario (1) has not shown any adverse effects at Potter Point Quantitative, probabilistic, radioecological risk assessment

  18. Conclusions - general • Available software can be conservatively and successfully applied to RRA • Calculated exposure criteria (90-95% spp protection) are comparable to published recommendations, BUT chronic exposure criteria are substantially lower • Straightforward technique was used here • - Scenario selections could be more realistic (mixing-zone dilutions and bioavailability) and can be refined to suit other site-specific applications • Improved selectivity of RESPONSE data will help (more site-relevant data recovery from the FRED) Quantitative, probabilistic, radioecological risk assessment

  19. Some Lessons • Bioavailability (particulate adsorption) • Co-60 dominant in the marine environment • Categories within FRED(ERICA) Quantitative, probabilistic, radioecological risk assessment

  20. Thank you.

More Related