1 / 32

Asking Users and Experts

Asking Users and Experts. Bobby Kotzev Adrian Sugandhi. Outline. Asking Users Interviews Questioners Asking Experts Inspections Walkthroughs. Interviews, Survey, or Focus Group?. Interview Take significant time and need more resources Survey Large data set Focus group

Download Presentation

Asking Users and Experts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Asking Users and Experts Bobby Kotzev Adrian Sugandhi

  2. Outline • Asking Users • Interviews • Questioners • Asking Experts • Inspections • Walkthroughs

  3. Interviews, Survey, or Focus Group? • Interview • Take significant time and need more resources • Survey • Large data set • Focus group • Seeking multiple point of views in a shorter period of time

  4. Preparing for Interviews:Things to be aware • Be alert to unconscious biases • Honesty • Social desirability • Prestige response bias • Sensitive or highly personal topics – survey? • Consider the interviewee as he/she is “Doing you a favor”

  5. Preparing Interviews:Outcome Analyses • Outcome Analyses • Plan outcome-based interviews • Associate questions with the goals • Capture desired outcomes • Differentiate between outcome and solution • Organize the outcomes • Rate the outcomes for importance and satisfactions • Importance + (Importance-Satisfaction) = Opportunity • Use the outcomes to jump-start innovation

  6. Preparing Interviews:Pre-interview • Identify the objective of the study • Select type of interviews • Medium of interview (in person/phone) • Decide how you will analyze the data • Write the questions • Avoid long questions (Brevity) • Avoid compound sentences • Avoid using jargon • Avoid leading questions • Avoid Biases • Clarity • Avoid future prediction questions • Avoid inaccessible topics • Test your questions

  7. Preparing Interviews:Players in the Activity • Participants • 6-10 of each user type (diversity) • Interviewers • Ensure participants understand the questions • Must be skilled • The note-taker • Interviewers can focus more on body language • The videographer • Whenever possible, record the interview session

  8. Conducting Interviews: Sections • Introduction • 5-10 Minutes • Warm-up • 5-10 Minutes • Main section • 85-100 Minutes • Cool off period • 5 Minutes • Closing

  9. Preparing for Interviews: Additional Preparations • Run pilot study • Be professional • Dress similarly and appropriately • Prepare informed consent • Check and familiarize yourself with recording equipment • Record answers exactly

  10. Interviews Types • Interview Types • Open-ended • Unstructured • Structured • Semi-structured

  11. Unstructured Interviews • A conversation that focus on a particular topic • Open questions • Can generate rich data which the interviewer haven’t thought about • Generates a lot of unstructured data • Impossible to replicate • Hard to analyze

  12. Unstructured Interviews: Prepare • Have an agenda • Be prepared to follow new lines • Pay attention to ethical details • Respond with sympathy but make sure to avoid putting ideas in the user’s head • Analyze data as soon as possible after the interview

  13. Structured Interviews • Predetermined questions, similar to a questionnaire.

  14. Semi-Structured Interviews • Starts as a structured interview but can change direction and inject open-ended questions depending on responses • Avoid preempting answers • Probes – “Do you want to tell me anything else about…”

  15. Interviewer’s Role • Do not interrupt • Keep on track • Unstructured interview easy goes off-track • Silence is golden • “permission” to provide more detail • Remain attentive • Asking the tough questions • Wait until you develop rapport • Using examples • Watch for generalities • Do not force choices

  16. Interviewer’s Role (cont’d) • Watch for markers • Key events to probe for more rich information • Select the right type of probes • Know when to move on • Reflecting • Summarize, reword, or reflect responses • Empathy and antagonism • Transitions • Transition smoothly from one topic to another

  17. Monitoring the Relationships with the Interviewee/Participant • Watch participant’s body language • Nervous, tenses – go to easier question or restate purpose/motivation of the study • Fighting for control • Ask yourself why one refusing your questions • Hold your opinions • Dos and Don’ts

  18. Interview: Data Analysis and Interpretation • Must be analyzed shortly after each interview • Categorizing • Affinity diagram • Qualitative analysis tools • Look for patterns

  19. Interview: Communicate the Findings • Over time • By topic • By participant • Vehicles for communicating the results • Summarized poster • Identify follow-up activities based on the results • Table of recommendations (uncovered issues and next steps)

  20. Questionnaires • Good, established technique for collecting demographic data and users opinion • Can be Closed and Open. • Can be distributed to large number of people

  21. Questionnaires: Designing • Start with basic demographic data • Make questions clear and specific • When possible ask closed questions and offer a range of answers • Include no-opinion option • Ordering matters • Avoid complex and compound questions • Use intuitive, consistent scaling • Avoid jargons • Provide clear instructions how to complete the questioner

  22. Questionnaires: Question Types • Checkboxes • Likert Scales • Semantic differential scales Gender: Maleq Femaleq

  23. Questionnaires: Administering • Well designed • Include stamped self addressed envelope • Provide a short version • Contact and respondents trough a follow-up, mail, e-mail phone • Offer incentives like payments

  24. Questionnaires: Online Forms • Pros: • Reach large audience • Response is fast • No postage costs • Data is already in a electronic format and can be imported easily in DB • Errors can be corrected easily and fast • Cons: • Obtaining random sample is difficult – web users represent only a certain demographic. • Participants are self selecting – proclaimed nonscientific

  25. Questionnaires: Online Forms (cont’) • Construct Online questioners based on their paper forms • Run pilot studies

  26. Asking Experts • Experts will be power users but also could be involved with the development of similar, successful products so they have an deeper understanding.

  27. Asking Experts: Inspections • Heuristic evaluations • evaluate user-interface against a predetermined guidelines and principles • Visibility of system status • Are users kept informed about what is going on? • Is appropriate feedback provided within reasonable time about a user action? • User Control and freedom • Are there ways of allowing users to easily escape from places they unexpectedly find themselves in? • Consistency and standards • Are the ways of performing similar actions consistent?

  28. Asking Experts: Inspections (cont’) • Different heuristics are needed for different products, devices and software • Using heuristics and experts can reveal issues fast and inexpensively – 5 experts can reveal 75% of issues - graph • Performing heuristic evaluation • Spend 1-2 hours with the product. • At least two passes – one to get the feel, second to walk trough the interface and address all aspects of usability. • Have a specific task in mind when evaluating functional products

  29. Asking Experts: Inspections (cont’) • Heuristic evaluation of websites • Internal consistency • Simple dialog • Shortcuts • Minimizing the user memory load • Preventing errors • Feedback • Internal locus of control • Layout • Internal consistency

  30. Asking Experts: Problems • Reporting issues which are not there – (Bill Bailey 2001)

  31. Asking Experts: Walkthroughs • Walk through a task and to notice problems • “Cognitive walkthroughs” – simulating the user problem solving process for a task • Figure if the users will know what to do, how to do it and weather the action was correct or not. • Record assumptions, side issues and summaries of results • Pluralistic walkthroughs • Users developers and usability experts get together to step through a scenario

  32. Summary • Interviews • Fresh input • Questionnaires • Reach the masses • Experts • Easy way to discover most problems

More Related