Download
1 / 31
820 likes | 2.23k Views
The socio-economic contribution of forests to livelihood and the impact of their use on the environment are essential components of modern concepts for sustainable forest management (MCPFE, 2003). Definition for Non-Timber Forest Products.
E N D
The socio-economic contribution of forests to livelihood and the impact of their use on the environment are essential components of modern concepts for sustainable forest management (MCPFE, 2003)
Definition for Non-Timber Forest Products The term ‘Non-Timber Forest Products’ (NTFPs) encompasses all biological materials other than timber, which are extracted from forests for human use. De Beer and McDermott (1989)
Definition for Non-Timber Forest Products Goods Things, articles, objects worth attaining; movable properties; merchandise; wares; services of valve. An economic good is defined as any physical object, natural or man-made, or service rendered, which could command a price in a market. Services Provision of assistance; act of serving; work done to meet some needs; intangible, non-transferable economic goods, as distinct from physicalcommodities. Products Things/substances/articles produced by a process; output of goods and services resulting from the input of resources or factors of production used to produce them. Chandrasekharan (1992)
Major services provided by forests • Protection of water resources, soil and other ecosystem functions • Protection of infrastructure and other managed natural resources • Influence on the local climate and reduction of gas emission impacts. • Conservation of the natural habitat and biological diversity. • Recreational and other social functions of forests. • Protecting the cultural and spiritual values. Gottle and Sène, 1997, MCPFE 2003
A Proliferation of New Terms • ‘non-wood goods and benefits’ • ‘non-wood goods and services’ • ‘other forest products’ • ‘secondary forest products’ • ‘special forest products’ • ‘wild crafted products’ • ‘biodiversity products’ • ‘natural products’ • ‘minor forest products’ • ‘non-timber forest products’ • ‘non-wood forest products’ • ‘forest products other than wood/timber’ and ‘tree-crops’ Vantomme, 2003
Other Classification Systems for NWGS • End use and plant use classifications • Classification based on life forms and plant parts • Classification according to management characteristics (supply and demand characterisitcs)
Problems in Assessing NWGS • Seasonality: some of the functions, variables or attributes can only be observed during specific seasons (e.g. fruits, partly protection) • Area reference: some of the functions relate to sample plots, others to specific small areas, some to large areas (e.g. wind protection will extend far beyond the forest itself) • Assessment is only indirectly possible during the inventory, such as recreational use, which can be assessed from other indicators • Attributes are qualitative (e.g. conservation) • Suitability vs. actual use of the function (e.g. recreation – a forest might be suitable for recreation, but the actual use depends on the proximity to settlements or accessibility) • The assessment is very costly (e.g. measuring herbaceous vegetation or faunistic diversity) Pelz, 1995
Sources for Reporting on NWGS • Biodiversity inventories (list of species) • Cultural studies • User, market or product surveys • Resource inventories Lund (1995)
Assessment of NWGS Wong, 2000
Assessment of NWGS Volk and Schirmer, 2004
The MCPFE’s Indicators on Non-Wood Goods and Services Indicator 3.3: Non-wood goods Full text: Value and quantity of marketed non-wood goods from forest and other wooded land Rationale: Non-wood goods (NWGs) are e.g. game meat, pelts, fruits and berries, mushrooms and truffles, cork, medicinal plants, Christmas trees, honey or nuts. Non-wood goods have an important economic value with regard to SFM. However, it has to be considered that depending on national laws the income of e.g. berry picking might belongs to the berry picker and not necessarily to the forest owner. This indicator is mainly linked to indicator 3.2, 3.4 and 6.11.
The MCPFE’s Indicators on Non-Wood Goods and Services Indicator 3.3: Non-wood goods International data provider: TBFRA Eurostat: IEEAF on progress Measurement units: Status:kg Changes: kg/yr. Status:National currency/kg Changes: National currency/kg/yr. Current periodicity of data availability: 10 years Reporting notes: Separate figures to be reported on: Value of marketed NWGs from forest land, Value of marketed NWGs from other wooded land, Quantity of marketed NWGs from forest land, Quantity of marketed NWGs from other wooded land The NWGs should be confined to the three most important goods (value) per country
The MCPFE’s Indicators on Non-Wood Goods and Services Indicator 3.4: Services Full text: Value of marketed services on forest and other wooded land Rationale: Marketed services include, for instance, hunting licences, fishing licences, managed outdoor recreation areas or trails for mountain biking, horse riding, skiing and other recreational activities. Also environmental services like private contracts for conservation should be indicated here. These marketed services of the forest contribute directly to increase the income of the forest owner. This indicator is mainly linked to indicator 3.2, 3.3 and 6.11. International data provider: TBFRA
The MCPFE’s Indicators on Non-Wood Goods and Services Indicator 3.4: Services Measurement units: Status: National currency/ha Changes: National currency/ha/yr. Current periodicity of data availability: 10 years Reporting notes: Separate figures to be reported on: Value of marketed services on forest land Value of marketed services on other wooded land The marketed services should be confined to the three most important services (value) per country
The MCPFE’s Indicators on Non-Wood Goods and Services Indicator 6.4: Expenditures for services Full text: Total expenditures for long-term sustainable services from forests Rationale: Forest owners, public and private, incur additional expenditures for producing a range of services that are demanded by the public free of costs. These are, for instance, expenditures to maintain protective forests against natural hazards, for preventing soil erosion or for protecting water quality as well as social services. These services are an important contribution to the quality of life and safety of humankind. It is essential to ensure that these services are maintained and that adequate public funding is provided to cover the necessary related expenditures. The total national expenditures for services from the forests should provide quantitative information on the efforts of countries to provide such forest services.
The MCPFE’s Indicators on Non-Wood Goods and Services Indicator 6.4: Expenditures for services International data provider: - Measurement units: € for status and changes Current periodicity of data availability: n.a. Reporting notes: Currently information on data availability is weak and data collectionmechanisms have not yet been established. This indicator needs to be further elaborated before implementation.
Problems • Categories of non-wood goods and services are not specifically mentioned. • Reference is made to a selected list of goods and services, namely “game meat, pelts, fruits and berries, mushrooms and truffles, cork, medicinal plants, Christmas trees, honey or nuts” and “hunting licences, fishing licences, managed outdoor recreation areas or trails for mountain biking, horse riding, skiing, and other recreational activities” as well as “environmental services like private contracts for conservation”. • Rametsteiner (2005) recommended to use the FAO classification of NWGS • Specifying the quantity of non-wood products will result in a mixture of units of measurements (e.g. weight, volume, length) • even for the same product different measurement units can be applied (e.g. honey reported in kilogram or litre).
Problems • The value of marketed non-wood goods and services (indicators 3.3 and 3.4) is to be given in terms of national currency. • For indicator 6.4. reporting in € is requested. • For a consistent approach reporting should be done in national currency. • Appropriate average exchange rates should be utilised for reporting years. • The reference to national currency needs special attention when results are interpreted, as results may not be comparable due to differences in local incomes or gross national products. Deriving the importance of NWGS for national markets may not be easily derived from the figures specified in national currency unless the individual national figures are standardized, e.g. by presenting them in relation to GNPs. • Changes reported in national currency may be influenced by inflation rates or drop-off in prices due to substitution processes
Problems • The financial beneficiary of marketing a good or a service may not in all cases be the forest owner. • Mentioning that it “… has to be considered that depending on national laws the income of e.g. berry picking might belongs to the berry picker and not necessarily to the forest owner” and that “…marketed services of the forest contribute directly to increase the income of the forest owner”does not provide a consistent guidance on how to handle income for non-forest owners. • The background documents notice that for indicator 6.4 “information on data availability is weak and data collection mechanisms have not yet been established.” In addition “this indicator needs to be further elaborated before implementation.”
Draft Enquiry for NWGS 1. Marketed Non-Wood Goods 1a. Current Status of Non-Wood Goods -Plant Products -Animals and Animal Products Yes Information available No 1b. Average Annual Changesof Non-Wood Goods -Plant Products -Animals and Animal Products 2. Marketed Services Yes Information available 2a. Current Status of Marketed Services No 2b. Average Annual Changes of MarketedServices 3. Expenditures for Services 3a. Current Status of Expenditures for Services Yes Information available No 3b. Average Annual Change of Expenditures for Services 4. General Questions
