key improvement themes

1. The New Inspection FrameworkThe Multi agency arrangements for protecting childrenThe multi-agency arrangements for the protection of childrenThe multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children

2. key improvement themes • Planned and purposeful direct work with families • Targets and process only matter if quality matters • Management oversight, analysis and challenge • LSCBs, conference chairs, managers must challenge practice • Identification and management of risk of harm to children • Seeing children - hearing them over the needs of their parents • Early help

3. key characteristics of poor performance • Assessment , identification and management of risk-Limited direct work with families by social workers • Early support for families not delivered by trained and experienced staff, leaving some children at risk • Impact of early support not examined and child in need/child protection thresholds are confused

4. key characteristics of poor performance • Assessment where the child is not seen or their views sought • ‘Start again’ assessments with limited family history • Case chronologies fail to highlight significant incidents and therefore increasing risk of harm • Often poor preparation for conferences and strategy meetings leading to unclear plans and decisions • Weak arrangements with adult and voluntary sector in families where there are vulnerable children

5. Munro Review • Effectiveness of the contributions of all local services, • The child’s journey from needing to receiving help • Effectiveness of the help and protection for children & families • Quality of practice at the frontline • Encourages learning and use of feedback

6. New inspections from 2013 • Ofsted, HMI Probation, HMI Constabulary, CQC, HMI Prisons, HMPCSI (triggered by quality of decisions in prosecution and by effectiveness of CPS) • Consultation and piloting • Launch in April 2013, programme commences June 2013

7. Proposed Inspection • universal unannounced joint inspection of the multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children – 3 year cycle • relates to statutory functions of the local authority as the lead agency for the protection of children and the duties of statutory partners as they are expressed in sections 10 and 11 of the Children Act 2004 • evaluates the effectiveness of the local authority and the contribution that other agencies make to the help and protection of children, young people and their families as well as the overall effectiveness of these shared arrangements

8. Proposed Inspection • inspections over a two-week period • tracking the experiences /journeys of individual children and young people through a shared sample of children and young people which will include observing practice and casework discussions • Focus on the practice of individual partner agencies in identifying, responding, helping and protecting children and young people • one single set of inspection judgements and a single report

9. Proposed Inspection • main focus is children’s journeys and experiences of the help and protection they are offered from the time they first need help to the time they receive that help • the effectiveness of help and protection is of central significance (including early help) as is the quality of professional practice and management at the frontline

10. Advantages of multiagency Inspection • Allows consideration of the partnership as a whole • Brings together different perspectives and expertise • The impact on the child’s journey • A shared judgement that drives and supports improvement

11. The importance of professionals acting collectively with purpose, making balanced judgements leading to purposeful action

12. Scope of Inspection early help • those children and young people at risk of harm (but who have not yet reached the ‘significant harm’ threshold and for whom a preventative service would reduce the likelihood of that risk or harm escalating)

13. Scope of Inspection referral and assessment • those children and young people referred to the local authority, including those where urgent action has to be taken to protect them; those subject to further assessment; and those subject to child protection enquiries child protection planning • those children and young people who become the subject of a multi-agency child protection plan setting out the help that will be provided to them and their families to keep them safe and to promote their welfare

14. Scope of Inspection children in need • those children and young people who are receiving (or whose families are receiving) social work services, intensive and/or on-going health support, support from or who are known to youth offending and/or probation trusts/and or the police and where there are significant levels of concern about children’s safety and welfare, but these have not reached the significant harm threshold continuing support • those children and young people who have been assessed as no longer needing a child protection plan, but who may have a continuing need for help and support

15. Scope of Inspection known by partner agencies • those children and young people who are particularly vulnerable, such as those who are privately fostered, children missing from home and children missing from education, children who live in households where there is domestic violence, substance misuse and/or the mental ill health of a parent or carer, children whose offending behaviour places them at risk of significant harm; children in custody who are at risk of significant harm and children for whom the release of an offender places them at risk of harm.

16. the judgement framework • Overall effectiveness • Effectiveness of help and protection for children, young people and families • Quality of practice • Leadership and governance

17. leadership and governance • Accountabilities: Chief Executive, DCS, Lead Member, LSCB chair and strategic leaders • Clear strategy/priorities • Partners understand areas for improvement and have capacity at frontline to change practice • Performance management drives quality of practice and effectiveness of help • Feedback and learning evident • Workforce planning – including supervision • LSCB know about and challenge frontline practice in help and protection?

18. The LSCB • enquiry and challenge of effective frontline practice • intended and actual impact of practice • children’s journeys and experiences • performance information - story behind data • early help and child protection thresholds but accepts the importance of professional judgement in assessing risk for children and families – • acts upon the experiences of other agencies in helping and protecting children, young people and families • deeply searching for system feedback

19. The LSCB • reviews local multi-agency professional guidance and procedures – including advice for adult services • Health and Well Being board - a shared agenda • breadth and impact of early help, support for children ‘in need’ and child protection practice – including outcome and ‘destination’ measures • impact and quality of supervision for professional frontline staff • case-auditing system - quality of practice, the recording of decisions and practice intent, the quality of management oversight, professional judgement and minimisation of risk • independence, accountability, transparency and robust challenge of the local system